Darth Bandon vs Darth Maul

Started by Darth Hord5 pages

7 to 9! Why is the poll so close?Maul wins this.

Originally posted by kamhal
Ok, Bandon perhaps was not a worthless piece of trash. Even then you have to agree that Maul is superior to him.

Firstly, I have already proved that Darth Bandon was very strong in the Force and an accomplished warrior. So saying that "he perhaps was not a worthless piece of trash" is a biased statement.

Secondly, Darth Bandon was undefeated in combat until he met Revan. Now you know about Revan very well so I will not go in to details in case of this point.

Thus it is now clear that both Maul and Bandon were talented and skilled warriors and I have already stated my POV regarding this fight in my first post in this thread.

But Maul had Way greater training and done many unbeilevable feats.
So far the only great feats we seen of Darth Bandon was killing Trask, push a Sith Trooper in front of a droid for a dumb reason and talk alot of Shit. Bandon may have a powerful connection to the force, but Maul is simply superior to him. Having studied from one of the Greatest Dark Lords of the Sith in Galatic History; Darth Sidous, Maul takes this with ease.

SW can you tell us how many people Bandon defeated? The only person you know for sure he killed in combat was Trask yet he was not a jedi. I am going to say that Bandon probably killed jedi but how many,who they were and how powerful they are would remain in question. Bandon may have had been skilled but there is nothing to say he would defeat Maul.

Originally posted by ThoraxeRMG
But Maul had Way greater training and done many unbeilevable feats.
So far the only great feats we seen of Darth Bandon was killing Trask, push a Sith Trooper in front of a droid for a dumb reason and talk alot of Shit. Bandon may have a powerful connection to the force, but Maul is simply superior to him. Having studied from one of the Greatest Dark Lords of the Sith in Galatic History; Darth Sidous, Maul takes this with ease.

We see very limited role of bandon in the KOTOR game so we cannot accurately judge his talents from KOTOR.

SW Databank has already made it clear to us that Bandon was very strong in the Force and he had killed many Jedi by himself. So statements like "he may have powerful connection to the Force" and "his greatest feats were killing Trask and a Trooper" are purely ridiculous and are subject to logical fallacy.

Take a look at Bandon's profile in the SW website: Click!

Just curious does anyone know why revan doesn't have a profile and they stuff like Bandon was killed by agents of the republic?
But anyway for all you know he could have had help to kill those jedi,they might not have been powerful at all.

Originally posted by Darth Hord
SW can you tell us how many people Bandon defeated? The only person you know for sure he killed in combat was Trask yet he was not a jedi. I am going to say that Bandon probably killed jedi but how many,who they were and how powerful they are would remain in question. Bandon may have had been skilled but there is nothing to say he would defeat Maul.

Unfortunately, you cannot argue against what is said in a canon source. So statements like "he probably killed Jedi" are also biased in nature. It is already made clear to us from the official databank that Bandon indeed have killed many Jedi.

And Maul is not unstoppable.

Originally posted by Gideon
I'd like to start a formal petititon and present it to Ushgarak with the request to permenantly [B]ban fanboys of this caliber. I'd like to invent a time machine and use it to go back in time and destroy the concept of KotoR so it wouldn't spawn such jackasses.

[Note: Sorry, Blaxican, but I will never be civil with LeGenD again 'til he stops beating off to his KotoR collection.]

Bandon has done shit in comparison to Maul. Maul is "one of the most deadly Sith apprentices in history" according to the TPM visual guide, he's pushed his "physical and Force-assisted abilities to the utmost", and tooled Anoon Bondara - the Order's finest swordsman - with minimal effort. What did Bandon do? Oh, yeah, he was Malak's ***** and died at Revan's hand. Ah, yes, that somehow bridges the gap of skill between him and Maul.

...Back in the real world [Logic Land], Bandon has done nothing to put him even on par with Maul. He'd look at Maul and piss his pants.

Of course you can't say "for sure" who will win - because you're an illogical fanboy and an inept debater - so let me clarify: Maul will win, and he will crush Bandon. [/B]

Nuff said here. Maul is superior to bandon in every aspect save for baldness

Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
Unfortunately, you cannot argue against what is said in a canon source. So statements like "he probably killed Jedi" are also biased in nature. It is already made clear to us from the official databank that Bandon [b]have killed many Jedi.

And Maul is not unstoppable. [/B]

Now what is ambiguous is weather or not those jedi were even good in the first place, They could be so shitty that they cant even block a simple saber strike.

Quality triumphs over quantity and from what we have seen maul killing the orders finest swordsman is something to brag about while also the fact that he took down my beloved darth vader in a saber fight.

And if you do agree maul > bandon why are you even argueing in the first place? Obviously bandon is above the other dark jedi to be malaks c0ck sucker and as far as i know those dark jedi were just little pieces of amphibious shit

Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
Unfortunately, you cannot argue against what is said in a canon source. So statements like "he probably killed Jedi" are also biased in nature. It is already made clear to us from the official databank that Bandon indeed [b]have killed many Jedi.

And Maul is not unstoppable. [/B]

i know he killed jedi, I'm questing the strength of said jedi and you don't know how he killed those jedi.The databank said

Many Jedi fell beneath the blade of his lightsaber.
Hell I could say that they were prisoners and he took out his lightsaber and killed them. You don't know if he had help to kill them. No one is saying he is weak, I certainly see him above the average dark jedi but Maul is one of the deadliest sith apprentices in history.

Originally posted by Manslayer
Now what is ambiguous is weather or not those jedi were even good in the first place, They could be so shitty that they cant even block a simple saber strike.

Being ambiguous does not means that those Jedi sucked because it is never stated as such.

And you just made a dumbest comment in this thread by saying that those Jedi would be so shitty that they can't even block a single saber strike.

Originally posted by Manslayer
Quality triumphs over quantity and from what we have seen maul killing the orders finest swordsman is something to brag about while also the fact that he took down my beloved darth vader in a saber fight.

Lack of detailed information does not means that triumphs of Bandon were lacking. You have to look at the bigger picture in this kind of case. Killing large number of Jedi is not a joke for any person. We expect this kind of achievement from only highly skilled warriors.

Originally posted by Darth Hord
i know he killed jedi, I'm questing the strength of said jedi and you don;t know how he killed those jedi.The databank said

Just take a good look at this comment: "Many Jedi fell beneath the blade of his lightsaber" and try to understand the logic behind it. It means that he engaged many Jedi and killed most of them due to his superior swordsmanship.

Originally posted by Darth Hord
Hell I could say that they were prisoners and he took out his lightsaber and killed them. You don't know if he had help to kill them. No one is saying he is weak, I certainly see him above the average dark jedi but Maul is one of the deadliest sith apprentices in history.

Where it is said that his victims were actually prisoners? Making absurd claims like these won't help you in any debate.

He actually killed those Jedi in the duels. And many people over here underestimated Bandon until I opened their eyes. And Maul is among the deadliest Sith apprentices in history.

Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
Where it is said that his victims were actually prisoners? Making absurd claims like these won't help you in any debate.

I said this:

Hell I could say that they were prisoners and he took out his lightsaber and killed them.

They were mostly likely not prisoners the point I was making that you don't know how he killed them.Because my ex. could have fit in the databanks description of many jedi falling beneath his blade.

Originally posted by Darth Hord
Just curious does anyone know why revan doesn't have a profile

Revan's official profile has not been created due to the issue of gender. But canonically Revan is male.

Originally posted by Darth Hord
and they stuff like Bandon was killed by agents of the republic?

This statement is true. Revan was actually an agent of the Republic during the events of the KOTOR until the revelation.

Originally posted by Darth Hord
the point I was making that you don't know how he killed them.

Oh man! what part of "fell beneath the blade of his lightsaber" you have not understood?

Originally posted by Darth Hord
Because my ex. could have fit in the databanks description of many jedi falling beneath his blade.

Sorry! It was never stated that those Jedi were his prisoners.

Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
Revan's official profile has not been created due to the issue of his gender. But canonically Revan is male.

This statement is true. Revan was actually an agent of the Republic during the events of the KOTOR until the revelation.

I just think it is interesting that Revan's name is mentioned Malak's profile after he is betrayed.We all know he is male but that is beside the point.

I fail to see how that puts him above one of the deadliest Sith apprentices

Originally posted by Lightsnake
I fail to see how that puts him above one of the deadliest Sith apprentices

"one of the" - hmm!

Bandon can also be one of them.

Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
Oh man! what part of "fell beneath the blade of his lightsaber" you have not understood?

I KNOW WHAT IT MEANS! I was just playing the devil's advacant and saying that to prove the point is not clear how the jedi died. I know Bandon killed them but that does not rule out the possibility in battle the sith troopers could injure them and Bandon finishes them off.

Originally posted by Darth Hord
I KNOW WHAT IT MEANS! I was just playing the devil's advacant and saying that to prove the point is not clear how the jedi died. I know Bandon killed them but that does not rule out the possibility in battle the sith troopers could injure them and Bandon finishes them off.

Actually you failed to note that the word "blade" is actually present in that sentence and the word "Sith Troopers" is absent in that sentence.

So we are actually left with the "Bandon with his blade" logic and image.