Iron Fist vs Wolverine

Started by cdtm27 pages

Originally posted by Daredevil1
[B]

Bam all that weight.

Get out of my face sons

The end

When someones posts Cassandra Cain holding her own with Deathstroke, she actually has the feats to back that showing up.

Wolverine, on the other hand, does not. IF feats are >>>> Wolverines.

And for that matter, so are Shang Chai's.

Originally posted by cdtm
When someones posts Cassandra Cain holding her own with Deathstroke, she actually has the feats to back that showing up.

Wolverine, on the other hand, does have greater feats. IF feats are <<<<< Wolverines.

And for that matter, Shang Chi's are weak sauce.

Fixed

Originally posted by Marvelknight
I can't convince a fanboy. If you really believe Danny wins 10/10, you're definitely a fanboy.

10/10...? Oh please.

Wolverine would kill him in any real battle without holding back. IF has absolutely no defense against Wolverine' claws. He can't dip and dodge forever.

Danny really doesn't have what it takes to put Wolverine down in fight where he's at 100 % and HF isn't taxed.

Originally posted by cdtm
Yes, JakeTheBank is a well known fanboy on CBR.

Always with his biased, fact based arguments.

Troll. 🙁

Originally posted by Daredevil1
Fixed

By government work standards, maybe.

Originally posted by cdtm
When someones posts Cassandra Cain holding her own with Deathstroke, she actually has the feats to back that showing up.

Wolverine, on the other hand, does not. IF feats are >>>> Wolverines.

And for that matter, so are Shang Chai's.

You lack a great amount of info on Wolverine to say such nonsense. What feats does IF have that are relevant to a fight with Wolverine?

Wolverine has been hit by Firelord' blast and has been hit multiple times by Hulk and other bricks in battles and keep on fighting. So what is the IF tech or chi blast going to do?

Originally posted by cdtm
By your accurate standards, so true.

Fixed

Oh, yeah, before I forget:

Originally posted by Marvelknight
Danny really doesn't have what it takes to put Wolverine down in fight where he's at 100 % and HF isn't taxed.

This specific gem right here is pretty hilarious.

Originally posted by Marvelknight
You lack a great amount of info on Wolverine to say such nonsense.

Irony. Didn't you say you didn't read Iron Fist outside of his appearances in Avengers?

Originally posted by Marvelknight
What feats does IF have that are relevant to a fight with Wolverine?

Read Iron Fist.

Originally posted by Marvelknight
Wolverine has been hit by Firelord' blast and has been hit multiple times by Hulk and other bricks in battles and keep on fighting. So what is the IF tech or chi blast going to do?

And he's been injured and laid out by far less. Also, see my above comment.

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
Oh, yeah, before I forget:

This specific gem right here is pretty hilarious.

Like I said, since when did Wolverine become as hard to put down as Pre Crisis Validus..?

We have Daredevil over there basically saying Wolverine can hang with heralds, because some writer had him take an attack from Firelord. Unbelievable.

And if IF is more skilled, why was Wolverine able to get off 5 attacks compare to Danny only landing two hits?

Originally posted by Marvelknight
And if IF is more skilled, why was Wolverine able to get off 5 attacks compare to Danny only landing two hits?

Same reason why Batman's able to solo the JLA.

Because that Avengers run marks the definitive Iron Fist? Considering he was so well used, and has so many feats under his belt.

It can't be that the writer just doesn't know or care about the character, based on how he treated him, can it? Nah, IF clearly sucks.

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
Irony. Didn't you say you didn't read Iron Fist outside of his appearances in Avengers?

Read Iron Fist.

And he's been injured and laid out by far less. Also, see my above comment.

I know what IF can do and it isn't enough to beat Wolverine. I've been in IF respect thread so talk that bs to someone else. You're a troll with nothing to validate anything.

Originally posted by Marvelknight
I know what IF can do and it isn't enough to beat Wolverine. I've been in IF respect thread so talk that bs to someone else. You're a troll with nothing to validate anything.

baka

If you knew what IF can do, you'd know it's enough to beat Wolverine.

Skimming respect threads =/= knowledge of the character.

I'm not really taking this seriously, admittedly. I will when you do, though.

Until then, Danny Rand wins this in a horrific spite stomp.

But if we're going to play that game, remember what happened to Wolverine when Castle blew his nadds off, and ran him over with a bulldozer?

Never would have happened to Danny. He catches bullets, and swipes aside nearly 50 of them without getting a scratch. Iron Fist > Castles guns > Wolverine.

Originally posted by cdtm

We have Daredevil over there basically saying Wolverine can hang with heralds, because some writer had him take an attack from Firelord. Unbelievable.

The fact that you ignore Logan's showing against Shang Chi and yet you claim Shang has the better feats speak for itself.

Since you ignore Logan feats of speed, strength, durability/damage soak, it becomes ludicrous on how you undermine Logans ability.

Both with IF and Logan cases can be made for a definitive winner. There that close to one another.

We have you basically saying IF is >>> with no real proof to justify your claims. Or Shangs for that matter.

Originally posted by Daredevil1
The fact that you ignore Logan's showing against Shang Chi and yet you claim Shang has the better feats speak for itself.

The fact you don't understand fights do not = feats speaks for itself.

Example: Lady Shiva beating Cassandra Cain is not proof that Shiva can dance around bullets.

Originally posted by cdtm
Because that Avengers run marks the definitive Iron Fist? Considering he was so well used, and has so many feats under his belt.

It can't be that the writer just doesn't know or care about the character, based on how he treated him, can it? Nah, IF clearly sucks.

Sounds like bs to me. I don't like it, it's not the real IF, or it's the writers mistake. Yeah uh huh, sure... Basically it's an excuse. A lame one at that.

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
Same reason why Batman's able to solo the JLA.

Batman has plans to take down JLA members. Doesn't mean he'd pull it off. And he's not taking them all at once. And this doesn't have anything to do with why Wolverine beat IF in a test of skill. The comparison is nonsense.

Fact: Wolverine beat him soundly in a test of MA skill. Period.

Originally posted by Marvelknight
Sounds like bs to me. I don't like it, it's not the real IF, or it's the writers mistake. Yeah uh huh, sure... Basically it's an excuse. A lame one at that.

Than going by Ennis's Wolverine, Danny stomps.

Originally posted by cdtm
The fact you don't understand fights do not = feats speaks for itself.

Example: Lady Shiva beating Cassandra Cain is not proof that Shiva can dance around bullets.

Right because a fight doesn't count......LOL Reminds me of the Mcdojo martial artisit pretending to know exotic moves and then loses a real fight.

Shiva doesn't need bullet feats. And even if she did have bullet feats it doesn't matter as Cass beat her a$$ twice.