Exar Kun & Count Dooku vs. Yoda - Lightsaber Duel

Started by Gideon8 pages

Yoda being called

"The most devastatingly powerful foe the darkness has ever known" puts him and him alone above ANY advantages Vaapad and the Shatterpoint lends to Mace Windu against dark siders.

Not necessarily, AC. In fact, I believe that that has been taken out of context; I'll try my best to interpret.

The above statement came from the novelization [G-canon; it's 100% valid]. However, the same novelization depicts Palpatine collectively stomping Yoda's ass all over the Rotunda, and yet only a few chapters before, that same novelization depicts Mace emerging victorious over Palpatine in a legitimate duel.

That's a discrepency and it's easily explained.

The most devastatingly powerful foe the darkness has ever known

In terms of absolute power and skill, Yoda is superior over Mace. However, Yoda hasn't exhibited any remote skills with Vaapad and shatterpoint detection, which -- according to the novelization -- combined to give Mace his legitimate victory over an opponent that Yoda couldn't defeat. No one is arguing that Mace's power exceeds Yoda's, but given the nature of his rather unique gifts, he is more effective against dark siders within the context of a duel.

Oh wow.. So Kun and Dooku can't adjust to Yoda's flippage, but YODA somehow WILL adjust to Kun's foreign saber and style. Wonderful argument, truly.

I knew it was only a matter of time till the "OMG Kun's gotta unique style lololo!!!111!! he wins! crap comes out, as Advent has proved having unique style really doesn't mean shit especially if your a 900 year old Jedi Master

If you could redirection your attention to the Dark Forces saga, foreign styles aren't the end all, be all. As shown by the neophyte Kyle Katarn when he not only defeated Boc Aseca, who uses an extremely unique lightsaber, and style, which is described unpredictable, and wild (yet still effective), but Maw, who uses a form of combat not seen by Katarn before either.

On top of that when has Kun ever encountered someone who as small, and moves like Yoda does and has the level of skill like Yoda does, considering the toughest challenge he'd ever faced in his life was Ulic Qel Droma who doesn't hold a candle to Yoda or Dooku. If you want a go the "Styles win battles" then Kun has NEVER seen something like Yoda's Ataru.

Why would it have to say it? It's common sense. Not only was Kun the darkest power in the galaxy, but he was miles ahead of anyone in the force .

Glad you can recognize the faults in your argument 🙄 all that is IRRELEVANT since this is a SABER ONLY topic. De De De.

Furthermore, Ulic was the only one that came close to him in abilities, and that was before Kun reached his prime. But I love your "absence of proof" argument. Cute cop out.

And I love your "I don't have to prove the shit I say with actual sources" argument.

IT doesn't have to say it.. That's like saying "show me a source that states Kun was more powerful than Yoda". Stupid shit like that.

Its like I'm talking to a 2 year old:

Prove up or shut the f*ck up , give me ONE source that says Exar Kun was the best swordsman of the TOTJ era and I'll concede the point.

I didn't say shit about Yoda, I'm asking you to PROVE this:

THe best swordsman of his era is nowhere in their league because they're PT Jedi

PROVE UP OR SHUT THE F*CK UP DIPSHIT


Guess what numbnuts, Yoda being the most devastating foe blah blah means what exactly? Oh right, that he was the biggest threat to a dark side user. Nice proving nothing jackass. Not to mention that's not really even true considering Mace is more effective against dark side users. Way to hide behind your quote.

Yeah I know so lame me hiding behind sources while you hide behind...oh yeah your OPINION.

A master swordsman with a unique style, unique saber, etc. It's not unsubstantiated jackass,

Asajii Ventress is a master-swordsman with a unique style and saber...is she god to? You simple saying "its not unsubstantiated" while at the same time...not substantiating it...makes you look like retard. You saying =/= truth. Prove what level of a master-swordsman Kun was as I've said you can be a master swordsman and STILL get murked in seconds by others who are simple batter. His style and saber are largely irrelevant.

What exactly do I have to prove? That even if Yoda is better than the other two, they are still in his league, and for him to somehow beat them both, Yoda has to be MILES ahead of them BOTH, which he isn't? Done.. Now it's time for you to prove your fanboyism with your ridiculous assumption that Yoda can somehow wtfpwn these 2 characters because he was, OMG, able to resist 3 jedi!!![/ QUOTE]

Yeah, moving faster then 3 Jedi Masters including Depa IS more impressive then anyhting Kun's done dueling wise. DOubled with the fact that he disarmed Sidious who himself is able to kill THREE master-swordsman in seconds as is head and shoulders above stalemating Ulic.

[QUOTE]
I'll do one better for you since you still aren't comprehending. A stalemate is where there is no victor. Got it?

I just postd that dip shit...Dictionary.com

You want to get into semantics, your problem. He more than held his own WITHOUT the force, and that speaks volumes for him.

No, he didn't hold his own its STATED he mounted NO OFFENSE. I find myself asking this question about you alot : R U RETARDED?

Ah, so because Kun trained himself, he's somehow weaker than Anakin because Anakin was trained by somebody. Now let me ask you something here Einstein. If Kun invented his own saber and his own style, why the HELL would he need someone to give him accurate training?

Now let me ask you THIS: If Kun was the originator of a style and only had 6 months to train with it how the HELL could he be an 'uber lightsaber master' Again thats like saying the original computer is better then a Macbook.

You go on and on about denial and fanboyism yet you can't prove that Kun was a better duelist then (and I'm being generous here) Tinn, Kolar or Koon you've yet to prove he's even on Yoda's level, and no stalemating Ulic doesn't put him there. His style and saber are rather irrelevant. So what are we left with? You in denial that you even have an argument. Unsubstantiated quotes and useless insults wont win you shit lil guy.


Yes, this is why Dooku was beaten by Anakin, who had 3 more years of training with Obiwan. Great argument!!

Anakin is an anomaly due to being you know "The Chosen One" at 23 he was one of the most powerful beings to ever exist...thats why you fail.

Right, someone's style alone puts them above another character. Pathetic argument brought on by fanboyism.

WILL adjust to Kun's foreign saber and style.
A master swordsman with a unique style, unique saber
Kun's advantage is his new saber and style and strength
Um because wielding a double blade with one hand is a unique style that died with him, because nobody else was familiar with it, and because it gives him advantage of using it as a double bladed style, or using it as a single bladed style, while both blades are on. Not to mention he can alter the intensity of both beams to confuse opponents.

All from you^ Pathetic argument brought on by fanboyism.

Yet again, Kun's vacation planner. YOu have no idea what you're talking about but assumptions are cute.

It doesn't matter. No source says he trained with a saber, were given NO indication he trained with a saber therefore he didn't train with a saber.

Whats strange is Kun was called by the DSSB a master swordsman even as a Padawan:

"And excellent moment and a master-swordsman" - Exar Kun bio.

and yet Vodo put him on his ass flat out, Vodo who in the grand scheme of things is average at best. So Kun the master swordsman got put on his ass by the average Vodo...what in the hell do you think Yoda would do to him? Sure he got better but still he's no match for Yoda.

But far better than Kun? AND Ulic? Please pass what you're smoking. Yea, Kun and Ulic don't come close because the PT fanboy said so. And what the hell is a pure duelist? Learn to debate without bias, otherwise nobody is going to take your shit seriously.

I've more then proved Anakins case, Kun would get butt f*cked ten ways to sunday by Anakin. The real question I have is: does anyone take YOU seriously?

Originally posted by xxXAcStylesXxx
I knew it was only a matter of time till the "OMG Kun's gotta unique style lololo!!!111!! he wins! crap comes out, as Advent has proved having unique style really doesn't mean shit especially if your a 900 year old Jedi Master

Good god you're a moron with legally retarded reading comprehension skills. I never said KUN's style will give him the victory, or kun WILL win...Wow.. I stated that if you're going to play double standards, then Yoda's acrobatics and fast maneuvers will play as large a part as Kun's foreign saber and style. Good god, learn how to read.

On top of that when has Kun ever encountered someone who as small, and moves like Yoda does and has the level of skill like Yoda does, considering the toughest challenge he'd ever faced in his life was Ulic Qel Droma who doesn't hold a candle to Yoda or Dooku. If you want a go the "Styles win battles" then Kun has NEVER seen something like Yoda's Ataru.

Yet again, diminishing a character by stating that the other character doesn't hold a candle to x, y,z . Try backing it up for once smartass, not just state your opinion. And one again, I never said styles win battles, learn how to read. How do you know Kun has never seen ataru? Want to back it up? See I know Yoda hasn't seen Kun's style because the style died with Kun.. There's my proof, where's yours? Oh right, nonexistent.

Its like I'm talking to a 2 year old:

Now you know how I feel, except I would add "retarded" somewhere in there.

Yeah I know so lame me hiding behind sources while you hide behind...oh yeah your OPINION.

No, see your argument is this. "Here's the source and here's how I interpret it which makes it correct and makes it canon even though I didn't back that source up in any way, but take my word for it". Your debating skills are as impressive as monkey making noises and throwing shit at people.

Asajii Ventress is a master-swordsman with a unique style and saber...is she god to? You simple saying "its not unsubstantiated" while at the same time...not substantiating it...makes you look like retard. You saying =/= truth. Prove what level of a master-swordsman Kun was as I've said you can be a master swordsman and STILL get murked in seconds by others who are simple batter. His style and saber are largely irrelevant.

Where is it stated that Asaj was a master swordsman? Where is it stated that she had a unique style and saber? Because as I recall, she had the same curved hilt as Dooku, and Bane a thousand years earlier. Yet another WONDERFUL argument.

I just postd that dip shit...Dictionary.com

You want to get into semantics, your problem. He more than held his own WITHOUT the force, and that speaks volumes for him.

No, he didn't hold his own its STATED he mounted NO OFFENSE. I find myself asking this question about you alot : R U RETARDED?[/quote]
This coming from the man who doesn't understand what a stalemate is. Let's try again. A stalemate is something in which THERE IS NO CLEAR VICTOR. Sylvar couldn't do shit when she faced him, and Ulic running away means nothing. She couldn't defeat him, period, the end.

Now let me ask you THIS: If Kun was the originator of a style and only had 6 months to train with it how the HELL could he be an 'uber lightsaber master' Again thats like saying the original computer is better then a Macbook.

Lets see, Anakin became exponentially better in 3 years, and wtfpwned Dooku.. Let's see, Luke, after 2 years of training HIMSELF, or rather no real training, was able to wtfpwn Vader. There goes your argument.

You go on and on about denial and fanboyism yet you can't prove that Kun was a better duelist then (and I'm being generous here) Tinn, Kolar or Koon you've yet to prove he's even on Yoda's level, and no stalemating Ulic doesn't put him there. His style and saber are rather irrelevant. So what are we left with? You in denial that you even have an argument. Unsubstantiated quotes and useless insults wont win you shit lil guy.

I don't have to prove Kun is better, because I NEVER stated he was better than YOda with a saber. If you're going to manipulate my words into your shitty argument, make sure you do a better job. I HAVE however proved that Yoda would have to be miles ahead of both combatants to defeat them, and he's not.

Anakin is an anomaly due to being you know "The Chosen One" at 23 he was one of the most powerful beings to ever exist...thats why you fail.

ONe of the most powerful, with a saber. His force abilities? Average. Nomi Sunrider was also one of the most powerful beings to exist during her time with VERY Little training.. Does that make her an uber god? No.

Right, someone's style alone puts them above another character. Pathetic argument brought on by fanboyism.

SEeing as how I never stated anything of the sort, your argument fails yet again, and your reading comprehension skills make you look like a dumbass.

It doesn't matter. No source says he trained with a saber, were given NO indication he trained with a saber therefore he didn't train with a saber.

Whats strange is Kun was called by the DSSB a master swordsman even as a Padawan:

"And excellent moment and a master-swordsman" - Exar Kun bio.

and yet Vodo put him on his ass flat out, Vodo who in the grand scheme of things is average at best. So Kun the master swordsman got put on his ass by the average Vodo...what in the hell do you think Yoda would do to him? Sure he got better but still he's no match for Yoda.


OMg make up your mind... Does Kun suck, or does Vodo? Or is Vodo now great? Or wait.. Vodo could actually be GOOD with a stick/saber, ever considered that? OF course not, he's not a PT Jedi!!!! And as far as I remember, his experience was all that put Kun on his ass. Once Kun used Jar'kai(as a padawan mind you), Vodo had no chance.

I've more then proved Anakins case, Kun would get butt f*cked ten ways to sunday by Anakin. The real question I have is: does anyone take YOU seriously? [/B]

Your proof for Anakin's case: Advent made a case and I think Anakin is better..

Nice proof jackass. The thing is, I don't care if anyone takes me seriously, but after reading this horse shit, I doubt anyone takes you seriously at all.

LOL DS thinking he's actually doing something other then rambling on like a idiot...and I'm in denial 🙄

Good god you're a moron with legally retarded reading comprehension skills. I never said KUN's style will give him the victory, or kun WILL win...Wow.. I stated that if you're going to play double standards, then Yoda's acrobatics and fast maneuvers will play as large a part as Kun's foreign saber and style. Good god, learn how to read.

Except your wrong, again. The foreign style is irrelevant in the fight, however, being fast and moving in highly unpredictable ways does. Yoda is faster then Kun and his movements are very erratic, based on the fact that Kun seemingly spent all his time training with Vodo on Dantooine, and the only duels he's been in is with Vodo, Crado, Sylvar and Ulic...none of them move like Yoda, none of them have Yoda's skill or raw power, unless there was anther Yoda type character actively dueling (Vandar is the only possibility) no one in the entire era moves like him. Kun would be overwhelmed by the speed and skill which would lead to an easy victory over Kun.

Yet again, diminishing a character by stating that the other character doesn't hold a candle to x, y,z . Try backing it up for once smartass, not just state your opinion.

Well lets see, you yourself don't seem to hold the opinion that Kun is even better then Yoda yet Ulic whom is as you admitted weaker then Kun and a worse duelist then Kun is somehow even near Yoda, its pretty damn obvious, Darth Sidious the strongest the Sith have ever produced couldn't beat Yoda in a saber duel what makes you seem to think Ulic could even come close?

How do you know Kun has never seen ataru? Want to back it up?

I just did with a little thing called a: logical deduction.

See I know Yoda hasn't seen Kun's style because the style died with Kun.. There's my proof, where's yours? Oh right, nonexistent.

Except its irrelevant.

Where is it stated that Asaj was a master swordsman?

She could compete with Anakin Skywlaker and Obi Wan Kenobi that alone makes her a master swordsman.

Where is it stated that she had a unique style and saber? Because as I recall, she had the same curved hilt as Dooku, and Bane a thousand years earlier. Yet another WONDERFUL argument.

You must have missed Ventress curved Double bladed lightsaber

http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Image:Asajj2_CW3D.jpg

She also uses it against Mace Windu in Clone Wars vol. 1

Sylvar couldn't do shit when she faced him,

Yeah cause Ulic was running the whole time 🙄


She couldn't defeat him, period, the end.

O really? She couldn't beat him..you must have missed that little scene where she backed him up to a cliff and was about to dice him in half and stopped...

Lets see, Anakin became exponentially better in 3 years, and wtfpwned Dooku.. Let's see, Luke, after 2 years of training HIMSELF, or rather no real training, was able to wtfpwn Vader. There goes your argument.

Again, your talking about u know the GRANDSON of the FORCE. Anther true lightsaber prodigy. You keep bringing up the two members of a bloodline that descends from the force itself, almost the entire damn Skywalker bloodline are anomaly's.

I HAVE however proved that Yoda would have to be miles ahead of both combatants to defeat them, and he's not.

No you haven't...you simple stated it, I'll say it again: your opinion =/= fact. Yoda IS head and shoulders above Dooku (as he pissed on him when Dooku was being boosted by a dark side planet and had numerous trump cards against Yoda), Yoda is miles above Kun as you can't even substantiate his level of saber skills and how they compare to other "master swordsman" and your only other points are his style which are rendered irrelevant.

ONe of the most powerful, with a saber. His force abilities? Average. Nomi Sunrider was also one of the most powerful beings to exist during her time with VERY Little training.. Does that make her an uber god? No.

Your point being? The key word is "during her time" place her next to Revan and she falls short, place her next to Bane and she falls short, place her next to Mace, Dooku, Sidious, Anakin or Yoda and she falls short, place her next to Luke, Kyp or Jacen and she falls short.

However Anakin the son of the force, who when he reaches a certain state of mind his decisions become reality, who massacred one of the most power beings to exist (Dooku) in 8 seconds does = uber god at least in saber ability.

SEeing as how I never stated anything of the sort, your argument fails yet again, and your reading comprehension skills make you look like a dumbass.

I copied and pasted what YOU said...those WERE your own words (I'm talking about the italics) coupled with the fact that you HAVE said things of the sort:

A master swordsman with a unique style, unique saber

Kun's advantage is his new saber and style and strength

Um because wielding a double blade with one hand is a unique style that died with him, because nobody else was familiar with it, and because it gives him advantage of using it as a double bladed style, or using it as a single bladed style, while both blades are on. Not to mention he can alter the intensity of both beams to confuse opponents.

OMg make up your mind... Does Kun suck, or does Vodo? Or is Vodo now great? Or wait.. Vodo could actually be GOOD with a stick/saber, ever considered that? OF course not, he's not a PT Jedi!!!! And as far as I remember, his experience was all that put Kun on his ass. Once Kun used Jar'kai(as a padawan mind you), Vodo had no chance.

DING DING DING. We have a winner, he gets it.

Experience stopped the master swordsman and put him on his ass and had Vodo been using a real saber would have diced his hand off. Now imagine what Yoda who is already a better duelist then Kun, who is already far faster, who is unpredictable, who has 300 years of Experience over Vodo, who has competed with foes that would make Vodo cry would do to Kun? He'd massacre him. And so what if Kun got better, Yoda is still leagues upon leauges ahead of anyone Kun's faced and has leauges upon leauges of more experience.

Your proof for Anakin's case: Advent made a case and I think Anakin is better..

Um no, I'd been saying Anakin was pretty much the best duelist ever since about January, Its irrelevant where the argument came from what is relevant is the fact that you can't refute it.

This is a waste of my time, you can't even form a coherent argument and when you do its based off defeated unsubstantiated points, in the word of Kurt Angle: You Suck.

Originally posted by xxXAcStylesXxx
LOL DS thinking he's actually doing something other then rambling on like a idiot...and I'm in denial 🙄

LOL styles actually thinks he's posted an argument, and not some incoherent garbage.. ::Rolls eyes::: It's nice of you to think we have an audience.

Except your wrong, again. The foreign style is irrelevant in the fight, however, being fast and moving in highly unpredictable ways does. Yoda is faster then Kun and his movements are very erratic, based on the fact that Kun seemingly spent all his time training with Vodo on Dantooine, and the only duels he's been in is with Vodo, Crado, Sylvar and Ulic...none of them move like Yoda, none of them have Yoda's skill or raw power, unless there was anther Yoda type character actively dueling (Vandar is the only possibility) no one in the entire era moves like him. Kun would be overwhelmed by the speed and skill which would lead to an easy victory over Kun.

1. Do tell me how a foreign saber and style are AUTOMATICALLY IRRELEVANT..
2. Yoda is faster than Kun, but is Yoda faster than Kun and Dooku?
3. Easy victory? Lol you really are in denial.

Well lets see, you yourself don't seem to hold the opinion that Kun is even better then Yoda yet Ulic whom is as you admitted weaker then Kun and a worse duelist then Kun is somehow even near Yoda, its pretty damn obvious, Darth Sidious the strongest the Sith have ever produced couldn't beat Yoda in a saber duel what makes you seem to think Ulic could even come close?

And the reading comprehension extraordinaire continues his ridiculous crap. Please, since you're so adept at reading comprehension(sarcasm in case it went straight over your head), tell me where I regarded Ulic as even near Yoda..Please, go ahead. No really, go ahead.

I just did with a little thing called a: logical deduction.

Judging by the mess you threw into this text box, I highly doubt you know what logical deduction is.

She could compete with Anakin Skywlaker and Obi Wan Kenobi that alone makes her a master swordsman.

That alone makes her a master swordsman? And tell me, was this before or after Anakin became exponentially powerful? Was Obiwan a master swordsman? I fail to see how being able to hold their own against a master, makes you a master as well. But hey, that's just me.

Yeah cause Ulic was running the whole time 🙄

O really? She couldn't beat him..you must have missed that little scene where she backed him up to a cliff and was about to dice him in half and stopped...


LEts see. Did their sabers clash more than a few times? Could she get in a killing blow? It would take Ulic without the force for her even to come close to him in saber combat. Oh no, he was running, that makes him weak!($*($*!

No you haven't...you simple stated it, I'll say it again: your opinion =/= fact. Yoda IS head and shoulders above Dooku (as he pissed on him when Dooku was being boosted by a dark side planet and had numerous trump cards against Yoda), Yoda is miles above Kun as you can't even substantiate his level of saber skills and how they compare to other "master swordsman" and your only other points are his style which are rendered irrelevant.

1. Yoda is better than Dooku, that has been established. What hasn't been established is Yoda being miles ahead of Dooku.
2. See #1, since there's nothing suggesting Yoda is MILES ahead of Kun, or even that far ahead of him, and this is just saber skills. Your opinion=/=fact, and don't tell me you logically deduced this, because it's illogical fanboyism without proof.

However Anakin the son of the force, who when he reaches a certain state of mind his decisions become reality, who massacred one of the most power beings to exist (Dooku) in 8 seconds does = uber god at least in saber ability.

8 seconds? Where did you come up with this #?

I copied and pasted what YOU said...those WERE your own words (I'm talking about the italics) coupled with the fact that you HAVE said things of the sort:

please, making up shit as a lack of your reading comprehension abilities doesn't mean I said anything.

Experience stopped the master swordsman and put him on his ass and had Vodo been using a real saber would have diced his hand off. Now imagine what Yoda who is already a better duelist then Kun, who is already far faster, who is unpredictable, who has 300 years of Experience over Vodo, who has competed with foes that would make Vodo cry would do to Kun? He'd massacre him. And so what if Kun got better, Yoda is still leagues upon leauges ahead of anyone Kun's faced and has leauges upon leauges of more experience.

OMg, yoda has 300 years more experience than Yoda!! I guess Yoda technically should have defeated Sidious since you always seem to imply that age=skill and power. Yoda would not massacre Kun, even if your fanboyism allows you to believe it. Leagues and leagues above anyone, good lord.. Maybe you should stay out of this one and let LS or Advent argue.

Um no, I'd been saying Anakin was pretty much the best duelist ever since about January, Its irrelevant where the argument came from what is relevant is the fact that you can't refute it.

Except Yoda is better than him, Mace is better than him, and Sidious is better than him, so that much pretty much refutes, or rather destroys your argument.

This is a waste of my time, you can't even form a coherent argument and when you do its based off defeated unsubstantiated points, in the word of Kurt Angle: You Suck. [/B]

Boohoo. This coming from someone whos argument is "He's a 900 year old pt jedi, therefore he's miles and miles ahead of the second most powerful DLOTS ever". Great one dumbass. Since we're onto wrestling sayings, in the words of the rock, it doesn't matter what your opinion is jabroni. As usual, quit while youre behind dumbass.

STFU n00b !!!!11111

Again, no argument just anther mess of craptastic insults and half thought out text.

1. Do tell me how a foreign saber and style are AUTOMATICALLY IRRELEVANT..

Been established and I'm getting tired of repeating myself, by the neophyte Kyle Katarn taking on Barxiss and Maw who both had either unique or rare styles, yet he beat them. Once again, if he can do it a Jedi Master in the likes of Yoda can as well.

2. Yoda is faster than Kun, but is Yoda faster than Kun and Dooku?

Kun can't keep up with him and Dooku on a world where his powers are at his apex is still can't keep up with him and is drenched in sweat while even attempting to do so.

3. Easy victory? Lol you really are in denial.

Over kun, in sabers yes it is an easy victory.

And the reading comprehension extraordinaire continues his ridiculous crap. Please, since you're so adept at reading comprehension(sarcasm in case it went straight over your head), tell me where I regarded Ulic as even near Yoda.. Please, go ahead. No really, go ahead.

You didn't, and I never claimed you did...

And I lack the comprehension skills:

I said:

Ulic Qel Droma who doesn't hold a candle to Yoda or Dooku.

You said:

Yet again, diminishing a character by stating that the other character doesn't hold a candle to x, y,z . Try backing it up for once smartass, not just state your opinion.

I said:

Well lets see, you yourself don't seem to hold the opinion that Kun is even better then Yoda yet Ulic whom is as you admitted weaker then Kun and a worse duelist then Kun is somehow even near Yoda, its pretty damn obvious, Darth Sidious the strongest the Sith have ever produced couldn't beat Yoda in a saber duel what makes you seem to think Ulic could even come close?

What my response should have been is (Using DS logic) its obviously apparent Ulic doesn't hold a candle to Yoda cause Yoda's track record speaks for itself.

Judging by the mess you threw into this text box, I highly doubt you know what logical deduction is.

I could call you out on the fallacy there but its pointless as you can't even coherently debate let alone understand logic. But as usual instead of actually coming up with a counter response you will up space with an insult.

That alone makes her a master swordsman? And tell me, was this before or after Anakin became exponentially powerful?

No, but that along with her other dueling feats: beating Kit Fisto who was noted as one of the finest duelists in the order and a complete master of Shii Cho, she's owned Glaive a huge muscular being, she's beaten numerous other Jedi Knights, she managed to scar Anakin 6 months prior to his obliteration of Count Dooku in ROTS, and even Darth Sidious noted her skills with a lightsaber:

"The child's skill with a lightsaber is most impressive . You have found a promising disciple, my apprentice. She shall serve us well."

LEts see. Did their sabers clash more than a few times? Could she get in a killing blow? It would take Ulic without the force for her even to come close to him in saber combat. Oh no, he was running, that makes him weak!($*($*!

So he's good at running a defense, Yoda pushed Sidious back and couldn't land a killing blow, Anakin the clear superior to Obi Wan couldn't land a killing blow at any point. Your point? I'm sorry taught guy but running away and and parrying =/= speak super highly for Ulic as you want it to, the feat my be on some level impressive but does that rank him next to Dooku? No, so why even mention it?

1. Yoda is better than Dooku, that has been established. What hasn't been established is Yoda being miles ahead of Dooku.

Till you refute this:

No, I've established that Yoda is the clear better over a Dooku whose powers are at their apex on a world steeped with the dark side, now compare the performance Dooku put out (the one where he's sweating like a mad man, half dehydrated, being pushed back and needing to throw people at Yoda to distract him and use missiles to retreat) on the before said world.

To that of a Dooku who DOESN'T have the before mentioned advantages (I'm assuming this takes place on a force neutral flat surface) the logical conclusion...He gets shitted on, Yoda IS Dooku's superior BY FAR.

Your just making baseless claims, again. Because definitively beating someone who has their power being amped to its apex and has numerous ploys does mean your miles ahead of that person since he(Dooku) can't in this situation reenact his only time where he was even close to Yoda in the dueling department and was still clearly beaten, while Yoda didn't even seemingly break a sweat.


2. See #1, since there's nothing suggesting Yoda is MILES ahead of Kun, or even that far ahead of him, and this is just saber skills. Your opinion=/=fact, and don't tell me you logically deduced this, because it's illogical fanboyism without proof.

Again your making baseless claims and this shit is getting old, fast. I tire of these circle arguments (you can't advance anything because you don't even have an argument thats valid to begin with) so I'm gonna end this shit now:

Exar Kun, the Masterswords Man was put on his ass by Vodo and would have cut off Exar Kuns hand had he been using a real saber, whose only advantage over him as the narration described was "experience". He then gets better enough to beat the established 'average' duelist.

I honestly can't see how you come to the idiotic conclusion that *that * can compete with Yoda:

Speed:

Yoda is noted for his enhanced speed due to the force to the point that he can leave and blurred after image of his movements due to how fast he is (Clone Wars vol.5 Best of Blades, Jedi: Yoda)

Kun is never noted for his speed in the comics and the most that was ever show by the comics was speed lines and given the fact that he couldn't even out run the Massasi Warriors chasing him, I doubt his speed is anything special.

Also Yoda movements are acrobatic and unpredictable to the point that even masters of the lightsaber forms I - IV (Dooku) can barley keep up and his speed was enough to overwhelm and disarm the most powerful Sith Lord to ever lived, the same Sith Lord who could outline Mauls body with his saber before he could even blink (Journal of Darth Maul )

He moved faster then 3 Jedi Masters attacking him at once, one of them included Depa Billup a master of Vaapad and several other forms.

He's clearly far faster then Exar Kun

Mark one for Yoda.

Strength:

Yoda also enhances his Physical power with the force as can be seen in Clone Wars Adventures vol. 3 when he lifts a huge gun in an even bigger book on his back and moves with it a comparison in size can be seen here:

http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Image:A_Stranger_in_Town.JPG

Aside from this to tenetically lift two C-9979 landing craft which each weigh individually: 1800 metric tons or 3,600,000 lbs.

While Kun on the other hand, his heights degree of power shown in the comics is lifting a being up with one hand and breaking a force powered stick. Um lets see how in the hell does that compare to Yoda?

Thats two for Yoda.

Skill:

Yoda's skill lies in his complete and utter mastery of Ataru to the highest degree to the point that people who know the form inside out (Dooku) can't even compete with Yoda's version.

His skill has lead him to be called the one true master of lightsaber dueling in the Jedi Order, he skill allowed him to disarm Sidious,the greatest and most powerful Sith Lord ever, who moved so fast he was called a 'shadow ' in the ROTS novelization, whom killed Kit Fisto, Agen Kolar and Sasee Tinn in about 3 seconds all of whom are noted as some of the finest duelist in the Jedi Order.

He was labeled as Mace Windu's superior and was able to toy with Dooku who was already established as:

"One of the greatest Jedi Masters in the orders 25k year history, and an even greater Sith Lord"

and

who was called a "consummate duelist " who was in "superb physical condition " for being 80. A man who completely mastered Makashi and forms I - IV and beat Sora Bluq who is described as:

"...one of the greatest lightsaber instructors the Jedi order had ever known, perfecting the various forms of combat techniques, both classical and experimental. He even helped Mace Windu perfect the art of vaapad, the seventh form of lightsaber combat so intense and dangerous, that to practice it was to tread perilously close to the dark side."

AND Tholme at the same time, someone who could beat Grevious without going all out (CW Grevious that is) the same Grevious who WTFpwned 5 Jedi at the same time (a party including three Jedi Masters and two Knights) who can compete with the likes of Mace Windu and Yoda.

He was also described by the ROTS novelization as:

"The most devastatingly powerful foe the darkness has ever known"

Where as Kun whom was called a Masterswrodsman as a padawan an level of saber mastery that you can't and haven't substantiated, he also has an the double bladed saber and a unique style to go along with that which is rendered largely irrelevant to someone on the level of Yoda, as the neophyte Kyle Katarn could overcome rare and unique styles. He's stalemated Ulic, beat Vodo, Crado and Sylvar, all of whom are not in Yoda's league and nothing like Yoda what so ever, however any of Yoda's upper tier opponents would be a match and likely beat Kun in saber dueling, Sidious in every aspect.

Three for Yoda.

cont...

experience:

Yoda has about 870 year of lifetime experience on Exar Kun, he has delved farther then any Jedi ever into the secrets of the Great Holocron, he has far more combat experience then Exar (Based on his foes and the fact that he lead numerous battles in the Clone Wars and organized the whole campaign, unlike Kun who actively participated in one battle in the GSW)

Vodo's 600 years of experience and relative average dueling skills were enough to overcome Exar Kun, Yoda has infinitely better skills and 300 more years of experience on Vodo.

It looks like a clean sweep.

Exar Kun dueling wise can't compete with Yoda in any field, he gets killed with relative ease, relatively quickly.

QED.

8 seconds? Where did you come up with this #?

I counted it from the point where Dooku says "You have hate, fear but you don't use them." as that point concedes with the novels description of Anakin using the dark side and Anakin truly getting serious with Dooku. But your right I was a little fast its more like 12 seconds but the point is still very well established.

please, making up shit as a lack of your reading comprehension abilities doesn't mean I said anything.

Expect you did say it my oh so unintelligent friend

OMg, yoda has 300 years more experience than Yoda!! I guess Yoda technically should have defeated Sidious since you always seem to imply that age=skill and power.

Starwman, and Yoda *did* beat Sidious, he disarmed him and pushed back his best force attack, he however *lost* the battle due to the high ground, him being about 3 feet shorter then Palpatine and having smaller hands.

Except Yoda is better than him, Mace is better than him, and Sidious is better than him, so that much pretty much refutes, or rather destroys your argument.

In dueling? No, the others are debatable and only Mace would probably beat Anakin more often then not due to his unique abilities, and you didn't destroy shit as I've always said "pretty much" "one of" "arguably" "beat almost anyone".

Hooked on Phonics. Get it.

Starwman, and Yoda *did* beat Sidious, he disarmed him and pushed back his best force attack, he however *lost* the battle due to the high ground, him being about 3 feet shorter then Palpatine and having smaller hands.

You and I will be debating this when I get back. In ze words of Scar: "be prepared!" Lol.

Well it depends on what you wanna go by (cause I *know* your gonna bust out the novel) the sript and the movie or the book, the book paints a different fight then what actually happened in the movie (the highest form of canon) where Sidious kicked the living shit out of Yoda all around the rotunda, in the movie its quite even and in the script Yoda flat out wins the saber duel. I'm using script and movie.

I'm back.

Well it depends on what you wanna go by (cause I *know* your gonna bust out the novel)

Consider this a bit of a blind spot in your clairvoyance; I don't usually reference the novelization when it comes to the details of the fight itself. The most I reference is Yoda's thoughts or statements made by the omniscient narrator that apply.

the sript and the movie or the book, the book paints a different fight then what actually happened in the movie (the highest form of canon) where Sidious kicked the living shit out of Yoda all around the rotunda, in the movie its quite even

The novelization contradicts the movie by showing Sidious kicking Yoda's ass all around the Rotunda, and yet the script does the exact same thing for Yoda, who annihilates Sidious throughout the entire fight.

and in the script Yoda flat out wins the saber duel.

Have you read the entire script as far as the duel itself is concerned? Yoda doesn't just 'flat out win' the saber duel. He completely spanks Palpatine the entire time. Perfect example: after Yoda disarms Sidious, Sidious attacks Yoda with lightning. Yoda launches that back in Sidious's face and the script says "it appears as though the Dark Lord is doomed".

And then, for no damn reason, Yoda jumps away to another pod, giving Sidious a chance to fight back.

...Yeah right.

The script and the novelization are both outliers; each show one combatant completely dominating the other.

Have you read the entire script as far as the duel itself is concerned? Yoda doesn't just 'flat out win' the saber duel. He completely spanks Palpatine the entire time. Perfect example: after Yoda disarms Sidious, Sidious attacks Yoda with lightning. Yoda launches that back in Sidious's face and the script says "it appears as though the Dark Lord is doomed".

And then, for no damn reason, Yoda jumps away to another pod, giving Sidious a chance to fight back.

Yeah I have:

YODA is deflecting the Sith Lord's lightning bolts.

The energy bolts begin to arc back on the Emperor. It looks as if the Dark Lord is doomed.

I always interpreted that as Yoda trying to avoid the inevitable backlash from the the force lighting being pushed back at Palpatine (which as it turns out was the very thing that cost him the duel)

The script and the novelization are both outliers; each show one combatant completely dominating the other.

So then what do we go by, for explaining the little gap in the duel and how Sidious doesn't have his saber?

Yeah I have:

YODA is deflecting the Sith Lord's lightning bolts.

The energy bolts begin to arc back on the Emperor. It looks as if the Dark Lord is doomed.

Precisely.

Which is why the script's account of the fight is as flawed as the novelization's is. Since the script and the novelization are considered second only to the movies, we must assume that they cancel each other out when they both detail contradictory actions.

I always interpreted that as Yoda trying to avoid the inevitable backlash from the the force lighting being pushed back at Palpatine (which as it turns out was the very thing that cost him the duel)

But that would require some sort of basis. Furthermore, if Yoda had a pre-existing knowledge of the 'backlash', I doubt he would have allowed it to happen at the very end of the fight. He always could have leaped away and tried some sort of other avenue.

So then what do we go by, for explaining the little gap in the duel and how Sidious doesn't have his saber?

That's the point: we can't.

Finally, suppose Yoda did disarm Sidious. Put it into perspective: Sidious would be trapped on the Chancellor's podium with a creature who is small, blindingly fast and agile, and who desires nothing more than his absolute demise. Also take into account that Yoda still has his lightsaber - which he can use to deflect lightning - as well as his own natural proficiency with defending and dissipating Force energy. And, lastly, Sidious is unarmed.

...How the hell would he have managed to evade Yoda under such disadvantageous circumstances? Logic concludes that he wouldn't, unless:

a.) Yoda allows Sidious to escape [I rather doubt it].
b.) Yoda is absolutely ****ing stupid [I rather doubt it].
c.) Politician Sidious is a smarter fighter by miles and miles than warrior Grandmaster Yoda [I rather doubt it].
d.) Sidious is more powerful than Yoda in the Force [I rather doubt it].
e.) Sidious somehow neutralized Yoda long enough to evade him and put considerable distance between themselves.
f.) Sidious still has lightsaber.

It has to be 'e' or 'f'.

Originally posted by xxXAcStylesXxx
Again, no argument just anther mess of craptastic insults and half thought out text.

Right, I say one thing to you, you repeat it back to me. Yet another cute game of "I know you are but what am I" with my buddy styles. Dare I remind you what happened last time you and I were in a debate?

Been established and I'm getting tired of repeating myself, by the neophyte Kyle Katarn taking on Barxiss and Maw who both had either unique or rare styles, yet he beat them. Once again, if he can do it a Jedi Master in the likes of Yoda can as well.

Am I to assume you still have reading comphrension issues?

Kun can't keep up with him and Dooku on a world where his powers are at his apex is still can't keep up with him and is drenched in sweat while even attempting to do so.

Ah, yet simple common sense fails Styles again. This is a 2 on 1 big boy.

Over kun, in sabers yes it is an easy victory.
Opinions don't matter here.

You didn't, and I never claimed you did...

And I lack the comprehension skills:

I said:

Ulic Qel Droma who doesn't hold a candle to Yoda or Dooku.

You said:

Yet again, diminishing a character by stating that the other character doesn't hold a candle to x, y,z . Try backing it up for once smartass, not just state your opinion.

I said:

Well lets see, you yourself don't seem to hold the opinion that Kun is even better then Yoda yet Ulic whom is as you admitted weaker then Kun and a worse duelist then Kun is somehow even near Yoda, its pretty damn obvious, Darth Sidious the strongest the Sith have ever produced couldn't beat Yoda in a saber duel what makes you seem to think Ulic could even come close?

What my response should have been is (Using DS logic) its obviously apparent Ulic doesn't hold a candle to Yoda cause Yoda's track record speaks for itself.


Wow... Just... WOW... So after all of that you still surmised that I thought Ulic was near Yoda? I can't tell what's dumber, this or you telling me I was claiming Kun would beat Yoda because of a unique saber and style(I didn't in case that point flew way over your head).

I could call you out on the fallacy there but its pointless as you can't even coherently debate let alone understand logic. But as usual instead of actually coming up with a counter response you will up space with an insult.

Judging by your arguments and lack of reading comprehension abilities, it's pretty clear you're in no position to point out logical fallacies, seeing as how after reading you need to worry about forming a cogent argument. Do me a favor and stop wasting my time, your debating skills warrant nothing but incessant laughter.

So he's good at running a defense, Yoda pushed Sidious back and couldn't land a killing blow, Anakin the clear superior to Obi Wan couldn't land a killing blow at any point. Your point? I'm sorry taught guy but running away and and parrying =/= speak super highly for Ulic as you want it to, the feat my be on some level impressive but does that rank him next to Dooku? No, so why even mention it?

Yes, running away and parrying.. What is your point? OH right, a stalemate is a stalemate. I still see this point is way over your head. But you're right. Ulic must be so weak because he's running away from a force user.

No, I've established that Yoda is the clear better over a Dooku whose powers are at their apex on a world steeped with the dark side, now compare the performance Dooku put out (the one where he's sweating like a mad man, half dehydrated, being pushed back and needing to throw people at Yoda to distract him and use missiles to retreat) on the before said world.

Make up your mind Styles, you haven't established Yoda is better than Dooku, do you know why? Because WE ALL KNOW THIS dumbass. You're trying to establish that Yoda is somehow miles and miles ahead of DOoku, and miles and miles ahead of Kun, and you haven't done either. So next time before wasting Rex's bandwidth, really think about what it is you're trying to "establish", so you don't confuse yourself.

To that of a Dooku who DOESN'T have the before mentioned advantages (I'm assuming this takes place on a force neutral flat surface) the logical conclusion...He gets shitted on, Yoda IS Dooku's superior BY FAR.

Wtf does this even mean, by far? You are going to have to back up your ridiculous claim as to "How far" Yoda is ahead of Dooku.

Your just making baseless claims, again. Because definitively beating someone who has their power being amped to its apex and has numerous ploys does mean your miles ahead of that person since he(Dooku) can't in this situation reenact his only time where he was even close to Yoda in the dueling department and was still clearly beaten, while Yoda didn't even seemingly break a sweat.

And yet again, common sense eludes you. In no way, shape, or form, have you proven that Yoda is miles and miles ahead of Dooku and KUN. What you have stated is the obvious, in which Yoda is a better duelist than Kun or Dooku.

I honestly can't see how you come to the idiotic conclusion that *that * can compete with Yoda:

Compete? Yes.. Win? No. And I honestly cannot see where you come up with the idiotic fanboy conclusion that Yoda is miles ahead of Kun..

Yoda is noted for his enhanced speed due to the force to the point that he can leave and blurred after image of his movements due to how fast he is (Clone Wars vol.5 Best of Blades, Jedi: Yoda)

OMg force speed!! So did Sidious.. So did Obiwan.. So did Maul. Congratulations, you've established that Yoda has the ability to use force speed in a saber fight. And now you're telling me Kun, who was more powerful than pretty much everybody in the star wars universe save for a few, CANT use force speed? Great going Molly.

Kun is never noted for his speed in the comics and the most that was ever show by the comics was speed lines and given the fact that he couldn't even out run the Massasi Warriors chasing him, I doubt his speed is anything special.

Correction. Kun's speed wasn't STATED in the comics. But by your idiotic fanboyism, if it wasn't stated, it MUST not exist!

Yoda also enhances his Physical power with the force as can be seen in Clone Wars Adventures vol. 3 when he lifts a huge gun in an even bigger book on his back and moves with it a comparison in size can be seen here:

http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Image:A_Stranger_in_Town.JPG

Aside from this to tenetically lift two C-9979 landing craft which each weigh individually: 1800 metric tons or 3,600,000 lbs.

While Kun on the other hand, his heights degree of power shown in the comics is lifting a being up with one hand and breaking a force powered stick. Um lets see how in the hell does that compare to Yoda?


Except for the fact that force strength can be augmented by any force user. Yoda has shown more with it, but please tell me how strength is going to help him in this saber fight?

His skill has lead him to be called the one true master of lightsaber dueling in the Jedi Order, he skill allowed him to disarm Sidious,the greatest and most powerful Sith Lord ever, who moved so fast he was called a 'shadow ' in the ROTS novelization, whom killed Kit Fisto, Agen Kolar and Sasee Tinn in about 3 seconds all of whom are noted as some of the finest duelist in the Jedi Order.

Hey dipshit, I used to use the "old script" as part of my argument. Seeing as how it was never incorporated into the movies, please let me know where Yoda disarm Sidious.

Where as Kun whom was called a Masterswrodsman as a padawan an level of saber mastery that you can't and haven't substantiated, he also has an the double bladed saber and a unique style to go along with that which is rendered largely irrelevant to someone on the level of Yoda, as the neophyte Kyle Katarn could overcome rare and unique styles. He's stalemated Ulic, beat Vodo, Crado and Sylvar, all of whom are not in Yoda's league and nothing like Yoda what so ever, however any of Yoda's upper tier opponents would be a match and likely beat Kun in saber dueling, Sidious in every aspect.

Right, because he's YOda, suddenly he's invincible. Wow, you've convinced me that Yoda is superior to the other two by playing feat wars. And yet again, nothing you said makes a case for Yoda being MILES ahead of either DOoku, or Kun.

Originally posted by xxXAcStylesXxx
B]experience:[/B]

Yoda has about 870 year of lifetime experience on Exar Kun, he has delved farther then any Jedi ever into the secrets of the Great Holocron, he has far more combat experience then Exar (Based on his foes and the fact that he lead numerous battles in the Clone Wars and organized the whole campaign, unlike Kun who actively participated in one battle in the GSW)

Vodo's 600 years of experience and relative average dueling skills were enough to overcome Exar Kun, Yoda has infinitely better skills and 300 more years of experience on Vodo.

It looks like a clean sweep.


Except it doesn't. Experience meant very little when Yoda couldn't defeat a 60 year Sidious. So there goes your argument.

Exar Kun dueling wise can't compete with Yoda in any field, he gets killed with relative ease, relatively quickly.

QED.


You have yet to prove it. Feat wars doesn't quantify how much more powerful Yoda is.

Expect you did say it my oh so unintelligent friend

REally? Since I said it, please show me where. Since you have constantly shown me your lack of debating and reading comprehension skills, I'll call bullshit and ask you to show me where I said everything you're making up.

Starwman, and Yoda *did* beat Sidious, he disarmed him and pushed back his best force attack, he however *lost* the battle due to the high ground, him being about 3 feet shorter then Palpatine and having smaller hands.

No.... Try again.

Dear lord, I hope this isn't your best. If it is I would tell you to find another hobby.

Originally posted by xxXAcStylesXxx
No, I've established that Yoda is the clear better over a Dooku whose powers are at their apex on a world steeped with the dark side, now compare the performance Dooku put out (the one where he's sweating like a mad man, half dehydrated, being pushed back and needing to throw people at Yoda to distract him and use missiles to retreat) on the before said world.

It is already a well known fact that Yoda is superior to Dooku in Light Saber dueling. But let's move on to your next part:

Originally posted by xxXAcStylesXxx
To that of a Dooku who DOESN'T have the before mentioned advantages (I'm assuming this takes place on a force neutral flat surface) the logical conclusion...He gets shitted on, Yoda IS Dooku's superior BY FAR.

You conclude that Yoda will shit on Dooku in a fight in a fair region, right?

Now let us take a look at the evidence from the highest form of Canon: SW - AOTC (Dooku vs Yoda in the battle of Geonosis)

In this fight, we see Dooku putting up a good fight against Yoda in a Light Saber duel because he was able to counter every Saber strike from Yoda before he decided to escape. Now of-course since Yoda was the better fighter, Dooku was left with no choice but to escape. Yet we never see Yoda actually shitting on Dooku in Geonosis, right?

So your conclusion is wrong and SW Databank also makes your conclusion wrong with these lines:

A) From Dooku's Profile: "It came down to a contest of lightsabers. In a blurring tangle of speed and light, the two masters of the Force dueled."

&

B) From Yoda's Profile: "The contest came down to a duel of lightsabers. In a climactic battle, the two master combatants displayed amazing speed and agility."

And your assumption that a region strong with Dark Side of the Force will actually boost a Sith Lord's Light Saber skills is also wrong. The correct assumption is that a region strong in the Dark Dide of the Force will actually boost a Sith Lord's energies, which will enhance the Sith Lord's power and this will give the Sith Lord the ability to fight for a longer period but it will not automatically boost the "Light Saber skills" of that Sith Lord.

Now let's move on to Exar Kun & Dooku vs Yoda case:

Since it is already established that Dooku alone has shown the ability to put up a reasonable fight with Yoda in a Saber duel, this will provide enough opportunity to Exar Kun to exploit the situation and turn the tide and it will be "easy" for him to do so because he is also a "master swordsman" and also uses a double-bladed Light Saber in combat (which means that he has higher chances for hitting his opponent and this is backed by the statement in the SW Databank: "He brandished a Sith lightsaber with twin blades that increased the potent weapon's lethality.").

Now you will say that being a master swordsman is not a big deal but again this comment will lack any sense because if Kun will not be a master swordsman, it will become "difficult" for Kun to take advantage of Yoda's distraction. But since he is a master swordsman, it will become "easy" for him to take advantage of Yoda's distraction and the duo (of Kun and Dooku) will be able to disarm the 900 year old Grand Jedi Master. Though you can say that the fight will not be easy.

I guess since he stalemated Sidious, that Sidious is miles and miles ahead of Kun and DOoku as well? Har har

I wouldn't call it easy for Kun to hit Yoda or gain an advantage. Granted it could be easy for Kun to find an advantage but being able to exploit will be difficult with Yoda because he is so dam agile and fast.

Originally posted by Darth Hord
I wouldn't call it easy for Kun to hit Yoda or gain an advantage. Granted it could be easy for Kun to find an advantage but being able to exploit will be difficult with Yoda because he is so dam agile and fast.

You forgot to take the case of "DUO" of Dooku and Exar kun in to consideration here.

Since both of these men in a 1 vs 1 scenario can put up a resonable fight against Yoda, their combined talents will be more then enough for Yoda to handle because of the following reasons:

A) Two skilled swordsmen will be facing Yoda from different angles.
B) This will be enough to cause distraction for Yoda or Yoda will be at greater risk because he will have to concentrate on the moves of both of his skilled enemies.
C) When Yoda will go against one Sith Lord, the other Sith Lord will also go against him.
D) Exar Kun is armed with a double-bladed Light Saber, which increases his chances of hitting Yoda.

Thus the two Sith Lords will be able to disarm Yoda because as a team they will have more chances of exploiting the moves of Yoda. and will have higher chances of hitting Yoda.

Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
You forgot to take the case of "DUO" of Dooku and Exar kun in to consideration here.

Since both of these men in a 1 vs 1 scenario can put up a resonable fight against Yoda, their combined talents will be more then enough for Yoda to handle because of following reasons:

A) Two skilled swordsmen will be facing Yoda from different angles.
B) This will be enough to cause distraction for Yoda because he wll have to concentrate on the moves of both of them.
C) When Yoda will go against one Sith Lord, the other Sith Lord will also go against him.
D) Exar Kun is armed with a double-bladed Light Saber, which boosts his chances of hitting Yoda.

Thus
E)Two highly skilled swordsmen will be able to disarm Yoda.

i understand that but and I do personally think the duo will win but I do think yoda could avoid many situations that could lead to his death before he dies, like say if Kun is temporarily out of the duel then while Dooku and Yoda duel Kun comes from behind to strike Yoda, yoda could then just flip to one side and put a good enough distance for the duel to be back at square one so to speak.