Originally posted by Shakyamunison
For braking the rules of the forum.
Seriously now... if you're calling for Bardock to be banned because he called you a name or took a jab, then the majority of us; including yourself, should be banned.
There's also a difference in someone insulting you as a means to ignore your points and/or troll you and insulting you because you factually and repeatedly say something stupid.
Originally posted by Grand_Moff_Gav
Dawkins has a personal vendetta and it shows...chances are he was touched by a preist...
I don't think so actually. And I spent the day watching Youtube videos on him. He seems to be a very intelligent fellow. He takes a strong stance, but he has reasons for it. He is certainly no stupid radical.
Originally posted by Rogue JediDude, I wrote essays replying on topic to Alliance.
insulting is not contributing.
Originally posted by Rogue Jedia
more AC propoganda.
Originally posted by Grand_Moff_Gav
Have you read his book the God Delusion? Hes clearly an intelligent man but has this sort of, condescending arrogance towards religious people that it is painful to look at his points objectively.
I sadly have not read it yet. I will soon. But well, what I think is that it is not necessarily wrong to look down on believers generally. If you can still judge case for case, it seems rather likely to me that more stupid people are people of faith.
Originally posted by Bardock42
I sadly have not read it yet. I will soon. But well, what I think is that it is not necessarily wrong to look down on believers generally. If you can still judge case for case, it seems rather likely to me that more stupid people are people of faith.
Well, whilst you might believe that, it doesn't really go down well with Scholars and academics. He is getting more and more passionate about his own crusade against religion. And since some of the most intelligent people in the world belong to some faith or other...in fact, I shall exchange intelligent for wise.
Originally posted by Bardock42I was responding on your resorting to insults when you cannot get someone to believe what you believe.
Oh, you could watch the video this thread is about. That might even make you eligible to reply to this thread with an informed opinion and not just that bullshit you spew.
I dont comment on the man because I know very little of him. But I do comment on immature girlyman tactics.
Originally posted by Grand_Moff_Gav
Well, whilst you might believe that, it doesn't really go down well with Scholars and academics. He is getting more and more passionate about his own crusade against religion. And since some of the most intelligent people in the world belong to some faith or other...in fact, I shall exchange intelligent for wise.
What insider information do you have on scholars and academics? Because I know a few that really like him. And I qualified it. Also, Dawkins probably got a point, that if you would take a sample of the smartest people in the world the atheists would make a much larger portion than they do of the whole.
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
I was responding on your resorting to insults when you cannot get someone to believe what you believe.I dont comment on the man because I know very little of him. But I do comment on immature girlyman tactics.
😆 👆 I bet the only thing he can come up with to respond to that is an insult.
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
I was responding on your resorting to insults when you cannot get someone to believe what you believe.I dont comment on the man because I know very little of him. But I do comment on immature girlyman tactics.
As I said that is not the tactic. I made my point clear. A skill, that you do not have.
I'm sure many like him, my point is he is pretty much detested at St. Andrews...well, go get a selection of the most intellegent people in the world. Dawkins is ranked No. 3 according to Prospect Magazine, but that was decided on peoples votes...
Bardock please only respond to things about the topic, ignore the rest.