Classic Ion and Parallax vs. Anti-Monitor

Started by Nikkolas4 pages

Classic Ion and Parallax vs. Anti-Monitor

Kyle (Ion) and Hal (Parallax) set out to destroy AM because there's not enough room in this multiverse for the three of them.

Can the two defeat this powerhouse?

I don't care either way. So I leave it up to you all.

I would say Ion and Parallax for the win...i can be discouraged though with enough evidence

Anti-Monitor destroyed Oa and the central battery by turning it's power back onto itself. As powerful as Ion and Parallax are, this is one time that they are outclassed.

Didn't Parallax destroy many universes on his own and quickly?

Originally posted by Nikkolas
Didn't Parallax destroy many universes on his own and quickly?

Infinite universes> many universes. AM destroyed the Multiverse. There's no comparison.

Kyle and Hal as Ion and Parallex can kill the Anti Monitor.

Yo.

they have NO HOPE of killing the A-M.

Tazer

Originally posted by Tazer
Yo.

they have NO HOPE of killing the A-M.

Tazer

Why not?

Yo.

Originally posted by DARKLORDCAEDUS
Why not?

again, remember how he trapped the Oans??

Ion & Parallax were basically as powerful as them (could be argued as MORE powerful admittedly), w/FAR LESS of their knowledge......yet they got PWNED by him/it.

then theres also the fact that even his shades were highly resistant to the GE, and they were just his shades.

those 2 would lose here

Tazer

AM takes this for aforementioned reasons.

[

There's no comparison.

Good point.

Ion and Parallax had to use actual power and not technology to achieve their feats.

No comparison at all.

Originally posted by Nikkolas
[

Good point.

Ion and Parallax had to use actual power and not technology to achieve their feats.

No comparison at all.

Your bias towards AM is funny. 😂

Can you show me one instance during COIE which specifically states AM HAD to use tech?

Originally posted by Nikkolas
[

Good point.

Ion and Parallax had to use actual power and not technology to achieve their feats.

No comparison at all.

How many times does this bullshit have to be disproved? 😒 Read the god damn respect thread. The Anti-matter wave was from the AM alone. The universe absorbing was the AM alone, the destruction of creation and end of the multiverse was the AM and spectre.

They lose, plain and ****ing simple. 👇

The whole argument over Anti-Monitor and his tech was settled in the last two threads.

AM never absorbed any universeon his own except his own Anti-Matter Universe.

Unless you have proof otherwise?

Yo.

Originally posted by Nikkolas
The whole argument over Anti-Monitor and his tech was settled in the last two threads.

AM never absorbed any universeon his own except his own Anti-Matter Universe.

Unless you have proof otherwise?

do U have proof that A-M used tech to eliminate Earth-3's realm, and all of those b4 it??

Tazer

Originally posted by Tazer
Yo.

do U have proof that A-M used tech to eliminate Earth-3's realm, and all of those b4 it??

Tazer

The fact that his counterpart's response was to use tech srug

Originally posted by Tazer
Yo.

do U have proof that A-M used tech to eliminate Earth-3's realm, and all of those b4 it??

Tazer

An extreme bias towards AM is all he seems to need. 🙄

Team.

An extreme bias towards AM is all he seems to need.

It's more like your own bias is all that is needed to see your claims are baseless and have been proven so again and again by Darthgoober.

Least he has evidence for what he says.

Yo.

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
The fact that his counterpart's response was to use tech srug

how does Monitors need to use tech to hold 5 realms in a safety grip prove that A-M needed tech to destroy Earth-3 and all the others previous??

Tazer