Moral Relativism

Started by chithappens6 pages

Implications just exist without aything being assigned to them.

I mean't which one is the focus of this debate.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Nah, that doesn't cut it. There needs to be a real reason why the morals he gives are absolute. Why everyone has to follow them other than because they get their ass whopped. Why they are "right" so to speak.

Well, if there was an omnipotent entity it wouldn't really need a reason to justify it's morals because it can simply making them right. Since Omnipotent in essence is super-logical as well. 🙂

Originally posted by Classic NES
Well, if there was an omnipotent entity it wouldn't really need a reason to justify it's morals because it can simply making them right. Since Omnipotent in essence is super-logical as well. 🙂

It also allows people who claim this omnipotent entity as their god to rationalize anything they wish.