Public Funding for Abortion

Originally posted by Bardock42

Because that works so well that there are no children in foster home without a chance of ever getting adopted.

Or they have a chance e(better than average) to become crack whores that suck your dick for 5 dollars.

Wait a minute...now I see why you support that. You make me sick.

Also, RJ, it seems unfair that people with less money especially should in the end be forced to first go through the harms of a pregnancy and then possibly have to pay for a child which will cost much more in the long run. If anything you want poor people to get an abortion anyways. Might reduce crime

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
so if someone grows up in a foster home they are automatically scum who will never amount to anything?

nice try, but I get it for free. maybe you should GET a BJ OR a piece of ass before opening your face hole and spouting off a bunch of psychobabble about others sex lives when you dont even have one of your own. 😉

so...kill unborn babies, reduce crime....you should be a senator. ❌

If you read again you will realize that is not what I said.

Disregarding the point and focusing on the joke. Good job.

It's not unborn babies it's a fetus, and it actually works. And the best thing is, the fetus never ever complains.

Originally posted by Bardock42
If you read again you will realize that is not what I said.

Disregarding the point and focusing on the joke. Good job.

It's not unborn babies it's a fetus, and it actually works. And the best thing is, the fetus never ever complains.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
your point is BS. the joke sucked. deal with it and move on.

Not really. There are lots of children in foster homes that no one takes care of.

Abortion does indeed decrease criminality.

And a woman should not be forced to go through the nine months of hardship and maybe even a lifetime with a kid she didn't want because your religious ideals want her to. Abortion is the best solution as it doesn't hurt anyone, but knee jerk religious morons who should be hurt on a daily basis anyways.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Not really. There are lots of children in foster homes that no one takes care of.

Abortion does indeed decrease criminality.

And a woman should not be forced to go through the nine months of hardship and maybe even a lifetime with a kid she didn't want because your religious ideals want her to. Abortion is the best solution as it doesn't hurt anyone, but knee jerk religious morons who should be hurt on a daily basis anyways.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
and here we go again on the woman being uncomfortable for nine months. she knew the risk. odds are she wasnt using birth control, so i have no sympathy for her.

That doesn't matter though.

Originally posted by Bardock42
That doesn't matter though.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
actually, it does. why doesnt it matter?

Cause your sympathy is no measurement of law making or reasonable decisions.

You may dislike it all you want, for many reasons most intelligent people agree with abortion and that is also why it is legal in most first world countries.

Someone beat me to commenting upon how tax money is constantly being spent on things that those paying taxes may be apathetic towards or be against, atheists and agnostics pay for "faith-based initiatives"; singles and couples without children pay for state-funded education; people pay for the "War on 'terror'" and so on and so forth.

That being said, elective medical procedures should not be state funded.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Cause your sympathy is no measurement of law making or reasonable decisions.

You may dislike it all you want, for many reasons most intelligent people agree with abortion and that is also why it is legal in most first world countries.

The example of ''if I don't agree with it, I' not paying'' is pathetic. Given that, Jehovah's witnesses shouldn't have to pay tax which go towards life saving operations, Christians shouldn't have to pay taxes which go towards scientific investigation into the theory of evolution. If we were all to pick and choose what taxes we pay, the state of our countries would be a right state.

Originally posted by xmarksthespot
That being said, elective medical procedures should not be state funded.

Originally posted by Creshosk
That's the way I feel. Ones that are medically necessary to save the woman's life should be covered.

How about procedures that could prevent a question from a lot of pain, emotional and physical damage in the future and could in the worst case scenario result in the death of the woman in question?

A pregnancy is not something to take lightly, even the nine months can screw up a lot. It's never good for a person to be pregnant if they don't want a child. The damage done to the woman economically speaking far outweighs the cost of an abortion.

Originally posted by Fishy
How about procedures that could prevent a question from a lot of pain, emotional and physical damage in the future and could in the worst case scenario result in the death of the woman in question?

A pregnancy is not something to take lightly, even the nine months can screw up a lot. It's never good for a person to be pregnant if they don't want a child. The damage done to the woman economically speaking far outweighs the cost of an abortion.

Boo...Hoo...Hoo.

Using that logic, nearly all medical procedures should/could be free. Have a small penis and it's causing you stress? The Gov will pay for and enlarging! Got yourself a stupid tattoo when you were drunk? The Gov will pay to have it removed! Born with a birthmark and you're self conscious about it? The Gov will pay for that too!

Originally posted by Fishy
How about procedures that could prevent a question from a lot of pain, emotional and physical damage in the future and could in the worst case scenario result in the death of the woman in question?

A pregnancy is not something to take lightly, even the nine months can screw up a lot. It's never good for a person to be pregnant if they don't want a child. The damage done to the woman economically speaking far outweighs the cost of an abortion.

Naw, its just that its a surgery that's not needed to save a person's life, then it is an elective or optional surgery. As was said earlier, cosmetic surgery shouldn't be covered, but corrective surgery that could save a person's life should.

Spin it however you want a pregnancy is not a major life threatening travesty.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
I have to help pay for the maintenance of roads that I do not use, and the public education of children that I do not have, and a war that I do not support. [b]Too bad. [/B]

Again, maintenance of roads help the economy. Educating children helps to increase a more educated society.

So, you're wrong. It's not TOO BAD.

Originally posted by Bardock42
That's good for you, but why should your reasoning not apply to that.

Who supports the war pays for it, those who don't....don't.

Why are you and the others continue to shift this into a war debate?

Originally posted by WrathfulDwarf
Again, maintenance of roads help the economy. Educating children helps to increase a more educated society.

So, you're wrong. It's not TOO BAD.

Why are you and the others continue to shift this into a war debate?

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
wrong thread, dummy.

Not really.

Originally posted by WrathfulDwarf
Why are you and the others continue to shift this into a war debate?

Because it's an argument closely concerning taxes, people have to pay taxes for things they don't agree with. Yet, this argument is still given by people who do not want abortion to be publicly funded.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Abortion has upsides too.

Not really.

Originally posted by chillmeistergen
Because it's an argument closely concerning taxes, people have to pay taxes for things they don't agree with. Yet, this argument is still given by people who do not want abortion to be publicly funded.

Isn't that a bit "et tu" fallacy ish? hmm

Or do you secretly support the war and so are attempting to justify the tax money spent on the war? 😖hifty: