Originally posted by Bardock42Pssh, you're not really familiar with the American law making process are you?
I did, it is "Public Funding for Abortion". Your sympathy does still not matter in the law making process.
Yeah its horridable but people's feelings get in the way of reason all the time in the law making process. Otherwise wouldn't gay marriage already be a reality over here?
Originally posted by WrathfulDwarf
Again, maintenance of roads help the economy. Educating children helps to increase a more educated society.So, you're wrong. It's not TOO BAD.
Abortion procedures save the lives of women, and save their children and families from living in abject poverty. So, you are wrong. Too bad.
Originally posted by WrathfulDwarf
Why are you and the others continue to shift this into a war debate?
Why do you not have an answer as to why people who are opposed to war should be forced to fund it, while people who are opposed to abortions should not likewise be forced to fund them?
Originally posted by Creshosk
Pssh, you're not really familiar with the American law making process are you?Yeah its horridable but people's feelings get in the way of reason all the time in the law making process. Otherwise wouldn't gay marriage already be a reality over here?
Well, his sympathy does matter in a way I suppose. As he can vote. But not fully, as...well, there are other laws laid down that prevent idiots from screwing up too bad.
Re: Re: Public Funding for Abortion
Originally posted by Adam_PoE
100% of American taxpayers are funding a war that less than 40% of Americans support. How is this any different?
Because if 60% of america didn't pay for the war then thousands of soldiers would die because they didn't get the body armor they needed or the right weapons or whatnot.
It's the exact same reason there are politicians who are against the war yet vote to continue funding it. Because when you stop funding the war the only people you're hurting are the men and women out there fighting.
Oh and I don't think I should have to pay for welfare either 😐
Originally posted by The Grey Fox
That pretty much sums me up!
Not you, this guy:
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/member.php?s=&action=getinfo&userid=38280
Originally posted by The Grey Fox
The more Redneck soldiers die the better, it's the governments fault taking their country to war.
wow...
in a strange way, this might be correct, seeing as:
1) in a democracy the government is run by the people
2) the government went to war
3) (1) + (2) the people went to war
so it sounds like you are the first anti-war critic to actually take responsability for your involvement in the war in Iraq.
Good for you!
Originally posted by Creshosk
Not you, this guy:
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/member.php?s=&action=getinfo&userid=38280
KK.
Originally posted by Grimm22
Because if 60% of america didn't pay for the war then thousands of soldiers would die because they didn't get the body armor they needed or the right weapons or whatnot.It's the exact same reason there are politicians who are against the war yet vote to continue funding it. Because when you stop funding the war the only people you're hurting are the men and women out there fighting.
Oh and I don't think I should have to pay for welfare either 😐
But then thousands of people would die because they didn't get the medication they needed.