Originally posted by quanchi112
Popularity does mean something. this is the real world. You do realize these games are designed to make money, right? I guess the only things that count in your world are profitable games like zelda that you like?I said usually which this could be an exception so my statement isn't incorrect at all. I can put up the definition for usually since you didn't catch it's meaning the first time. it doesn't mean always.
My opinion is my opinion don't let it ruffle your feathers I have a right to criticize games I feel are lackluster nowadays. deal with it.
No, it doesn't. When I'm looking for something to buy, whether it be a game, a book, a band, or movie, I never use popularity as a guide? Know why? Cause then I would be playing shit like DMC, reading Twilight, listening to the Jonas Brothers, and watching High School Musical.
Not really. Nao please stop making assumptions as to what I like or dislike, would you kindly. I could give a shit if a game is designed to make money, it has no bearing on how good a game actually is.
You implied that popular things usually do not suck. This means you could use popularity as a guide to find things to enjoy, as most things would not suck. That is retarded. Popularity has no bearing on how much someone will enjoy something.
If it's your opinion, then stop passing it off as fact. And I dun't give a shit about that Zelda argument, it's only the popularity shit.