Originally posted by MooCowofJustice
I see.Quan, do you honestly believe everything you've said about Zelda? It's characters in the threads and everything about it being a worse game than the ones you've liked in this thread?
Yes, my statements regarding zelda I believe 100 percent. The only redeeming qualities in my eyes anyways are ganondorf and the nostalgic feel because I grew up with it. To me it's the only disappointing games I have played this year.
Originally posted by General Kaliero
Herein lies the most important clarification of Quan's existence here. If he does not believe it all, he is one of the worst trolls on this board. If he does, his opinion is of negligible value at best and utter irrelevance at worst.By the way, Quan, please refrain from calling others terms such as "fatty," or you will be issued a warning.
NemeBro, same goes for you and "loser" comments. Destroy his opinion but keep it free of flaming, please.
Understood about the fatty stuff but I never start the personal insults but I will cease from these comments in the future.
I think zelda is disappointing and lame. That's my opinion. I realize you disagree which is your opinion so please don't call my opinion less credible than yours simply because we disagree on such a subjective topic such as video game preferences.
Originally posted by Peach
Disagree on both points here.And Dragon Age was pretty much forgotten about the moment Mass Effect 2 came out. The expansions to it were also seen as huge disappointments, both critically and commercially.
Also, quan, I said nothing about Zelda's originality, though I would argue that the plots and mythology are definitely far more in-depth than Dragon Age's. I simply pointed out that Dragon Age has nothing in terms of originality going for it.
Zelda created a lot of fantasy and video game tropes, also, remember.
Who forgot about dragon age ? And let's not forget tp was such a forgettable story with no real plot twists of any kind whatsoever.
People are excited for dragon age 2 it gets covered a lot by the major video game sites because it is a major game with a huge fan base. I suspect it will grow with each game.
What is more in depth with regards to zelda than dragon age ? Dorf is a carbon cutoff character as is Link. One is innocent and good while one is pure evil basically no real personalities to either character. It's the same in every one while in dragon age we have an assortment of characters with unique personalities, unique motivations, different outcomes based on whatever action you choose to take in the game itself.
Zelda came first I understand and was revolutionary but to me the games are stale, same plain characters in the same roles doing the same things basically. It's stale now granted zelda has a crapton of games compared to one game so it's not a fair comparison but with dragon age you can tell you won't be doing the same general things like acquiring one legendary sword and exterminating evil as such in zelda games.
Originality also is a minor factor with me it's all about overall enjoyment when playing a game and I got it in spades while playing this one.