Originally posted by CosmicCometI agree 110 percent. 2 was so terrible imo, the story, the appearances, the look, the lack of seriousness in the game seems just too silly for me as well, etc. The first game was so good and 2 was just dreadful.
Not excited for Fable 3 at all. I really don't like the direction the series took after the firstgame. And now we have colonial era costumes...**** that shit.medieval rpg or bust. please Molyneaux, don't tamper with shit that isn't broken.
If this game sucks screw the fable series I say unless the completely return to medieval times with the guild of heroes like in the first one.
Originally posted by CosmicComet
Not excited for Fable 3 at all. I really don't like the direction the series took after the firstgame. And now we have colonial era costumes...**** that shit.medieval rpg or bust. please Molyneaux, don't tamper with shit that isn't broken.
The only issue I have with Lionhead is that they can't seem to make another antagonist as awesome as Jack of Blades. Logan better make up for his absence or else we're having another Lucien-situation here.
Fable series centers around Britain through time. So ofcourse its going to progress through the eras of history. Fable 1= Medieval, fable 2= gunpowder fable 3 colonial. Fable 3 however seems to be doing A King Arthur thing with Logan, Elliot(Hero), And Old hero(F2 hero). You can guess who they represent in this mythos.
And besides its getting redundant when all the WRPGs are in Fantasy Medieval times so its fresh change at least.
Fable 2 was not a bad game. I liked 1 more, but 2 was a good game in its own right.
Combat for instance, melee and ranged in particular, was superior and flowed better in 2, although magic did kinda suck...
Plot was inferior, and as a villain Jack was undoubtly superior to Lucien, but Fable 2 is by no means a "bad" game.
QUIT GETTING BUTTHURT MEDIEVAL FANBOYS.
Originally posted by NemeBroThis^. Get off the medival age's jock. Colonial age will beat the crap off it anyday.
Fable 2 was not a bad game. I liked 1 more, but 2 was a good game in its own right.Combat for instance, melee and ranged in particular, was superior and flowed better in 2, although magic did kinda suck...
Plot was inferior, and as a villain Jack was undoubtly superior to Lucien, but Fable 2 is by no means a "bad" game.
QUIT GETTING BUTTHURT MEDIEVAL FANBOYS.
Originally posted by CosmicCometAgreed. I get the fact it's trying to set itself aside from the other medieval rpg's but it's part 1 mythos was awesome and I agree everything about the new direction and their evolution doesn't satisfy my tastes either.
I know what it represents. I still don't like it.I'm not even that interested in games with modern guns, let alone mere gunpowder weapons.
I want to slay things with swords and don bulletproof magic armor.
Originally posted by NemeBroPart 2 was super lame compared to part 1. If there was no part 1 I would have never gotten into the fable mythos in the first place.
Fable 2 was not a bad game. I liked 1 more, but 2 was a good game in its own right.Combat for instance, melee and ranged in particular, was superior and flowed better in 2, although magic did kinda suck...
Plot was inferior, and as a villain Jack was undoubtly superior to Lucien, but Fable 2 is by no means a "bad" game.
QUIT GETTING BUTTHURT MEDIEVAL FANBOYS.