Woohoo, official off-topic thread!

Fantasy is superior to colonial times, mainly because colonial times ****ing sucked for everyone, and magic is badass.

Originally posted by General Kaliero
Fantasy is superior to colonial times, mainly because colonial times ****ing sucked for everyone, and magic is badass.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
To be fair, not many people had a lot of fun in the medieval era, which was such a violent period incest was made taboo to foster families to forge bonds through marriage, and make them less likely to kill each other. Magic can fix pretty much any setting.

Originally posted by General Kaliero
Colonial British soldiers never fought dragons.

Fantasy knights did, which is my point. Medieval Fantasy > Colonial.

Originally posted by General Kaliero
Fantasy knights did, which is my point. Medieval Fantasy > Colonial.

I do prefer fantasy medieval, but fantasy colonial could also be good, I just imagine less so.

I disagree. Doubt it would be good at all, unless it's insanely well done.

Originally posted by General Kaliero
Fantasy knights did, which is my point. Medieval Fantasy > Colonial.

I'm pretty sure Fantasy knights don't have the monopoly on fighting dragons 😛

You guys are all laem.

They have the monopoly in the hearts of actual people.

If you disagree, you do not really exist.

Brett favre loss=magical.

I've got an idea to resolve everything. Someone needs to find a zelda creator or game developer and I or anyone can ask them via their website. Now I will concede to a game developer's answers on the matter because it will eliminate interpretation based debating on this matter.

Or we could not go along with that and stick to what we've been doing.

Originally posted by MooCowofJustice
Or we could not go along with that and stick to what we've been doing.

Well I think that this portrayal thing is still complete and total bullshit. Mostly because with the way you've been saying it, Link consistently performing super strength feats still doesn't mean he's portrayed as super strong. And, well, that kind of eliminates the only way I can think of to be portrayed as such.

Originally posted by MooCowofJustice
Well I think that this portrayal thing is still complete and total bullshit. Mostly because with the way you've been saying it, Link consistently performing super strength feats still doesn't mean he's portrayed as super strong. And, well, that kind of eliminates the only way I can think of to be portrayed as such.

You will never get a straight answer, if you get a response at all, from a nintendo dev.

Good thing no one gives a damn how strong comic characters are here!

Originally posted by quanchi112
I look at him honestly as video game strong. When I think of super strong I think of Thor or Superman. Video game strong is someone who is strong enough to get the job done in their games while being more often than not far stronger than any real person but far, far weaker than any top tier such as Thor or Superman in comics.

Are you trolling, because there is no way you could actually be serious.