Woohoo, official off-topic thread!

Started by TheAuraAngel3,949 pages

Originally posted by BloodRain
All of the games, mostly due to the sync variations, made you pretty beastly. Especially near end game where nothing would pose a challenge side for the few tough bosses. Think I preferred BN6 because of the beast power-up and how hax it was >-> Barely remember anything from 2-5...

Is there gonna be a third part to Geass?

Indeed. But not that powerful. Well, arguably 5 did with Chaos Unison allowing you to spam darkchips over and over again. It was so broken I can't believe the game itself didn't just snap.

1 was very obviously a beta. The gameplay was leagues slower than the later game so in general it was inferior. Not as bad as 4, god no, but second to worst. But still, the series was in it's infancy. So it's okay.

2 was when the series picked up its pace. The fighting was faster, the story more series, and the content was given a much needed boost. Some could make the argument that 2 is the best because of the vast improvement but I don't personally. 3rd best for me.

3 was the golden age of the series for me. The threats, both in gameplay and during the story, were much higher this time around and the scope of the game got bigger and bigger until you end up fighting the ****ing Internet! And then there was the tragic ending...

4 was a piece of ****ing shit. The only thing that salvaged this game was the gameplay, which is always fast and strategic. Here though, it is given Full Synchro, which takes a lot of the difficulty. And Double Soul, which is nifty. And the Dark chips, dumb they might have been, made a very subtle moral choice system. Still, garbage writing. Even by the series standards.

5 was a breath of fresh air. The ability to control new navis and the liberation missions did bring a new change of pace and was very welcome, even if the liberation missions do seem stupid at first. The scope is back and better(which is a testament to how shitty 4 was. The entire world was in danger in that game but it didn't even attempt to make me care). Still, it got really damn silly and the mechanics were broken.

6 was the Swan Song of the series. Great writing all around and it was above all fun. The only weaknesses it had were scope(the Cyberbeasts are nothing before Alpha) and the ease. Still, great game.

And yes, there will be . ๐Ÿ˜›

What are you talking about? whats B6 and Geass?

http://1d4chan.org/wiki/Sisters_of_Cleaning

crylaugh

BN6 is short for Megaman Battle Network 6, a game series for the gameboy advance.

And Geass is short for Code Geass(which is short for Code Geass: Lelouch of the Rebllion) an anime that several of us have watched.

Its probably my favourite anime evar. :3

I watch it for the fap material. Probably why Kallen is my favorite character. :T

I love Kaguya. ๐Ÿ˜

She is my waifu.

Good thing you didn't say Tianzi. >_>

Or Nunally.

Kaguya is the Queen of Loli's!

Those two are nothing but false prophets. Pretenders to the throne. >:C

Originally posted by TheAuraAngel
Indeed. But not that powerful. Well, arguably 5 did with Chaos Unison allowing you to spam darkchips over and over again. It was so broken I can't believe the game itself didn't just snap.

Hmm gotta agree here, but for a reason i cant recall BN2 really annoyed me.. In any case I should really get to properly playing 3. But overall, it needs more Bass~

Did you ever play the new star megaman games?

Originally posted by TheAuraAngel
And yes, there will be . ๐Ÿ˜›

What, really? Kay, need to finish R2 then. ๐Ÿ˜ฎ

Originally posted by Burning thought
What are you talking about? whats B6 and Geass?

What he said^ like a sci-fi version of Death Note.

And screw you guys. Its CC or nothing >[

Code Geass is the most overrated piece of shit ever.

Read something manly and with more layered storytelling.

Like Berserk, or Vinland Saga.

I've read Berserk. It is very good. But at times it gets too Grimdark for its own good. Plus its really, really slooooooow.

Vinland Saga does not interest me.

Originally posted by MooCowofJustice
Skylanders.

I'd take motion controls over what happened to Spyro any day..


I haven't played Skylanders, nor do I intend to, but aside from the boxes cluttering up my store, I like the concept of physical-to-virtual play and the way the game saves experience to RF tags in the figures, so you can use them at a friend's house, on any platform.

I don't think it'll work as a business model, but I like the idea.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Except WW is not objectively better than OoT at all. And I actually enjoyed the WW engine less than OoT/MM's.

SS is better than TP. You'd be hard pressed to find a better game. ๐Ÿ˜Ž

Anyway, done noming your troll bait. /Gets on msn.


WW had a few issues that marred it, like the Great ****ing Sea and those damn Triforce Charts, but the combat was better, the story was better, there was much more characterization, it was longer, some of the puzzles were more clever, the items tended to be utilized in more varied ways...

Originally posted by BloodRain
Hmm gotta agree here, but for a reason i cant recall BN2 really annoyed me.. In any case I should really get to properly playing 3. But overall, it needs more Bass~

Did you ever play the new star megaman games?

What, really? Kay, need to finish R2 then. ๐Ÿ˜ฎ

And screw you guys. Its CC or nothing >[

Well....none of the dungeons is BN2 were particularly awful that I can recall. The Freezeman part was unabashedly filled with filler though. And 3 is the only game where the real Bass has an actual role in the story. In fact, Bass is build up very well. The internet starts breaking when Bass is merely present!

And no. I don't like change. >_>

Well, it's not a sequel. Prequel. I think? Definitely not a sequel though.

Kallen is superior to CC.

Neither are a match for Kaguya. Everyone knows that in Code Geass, the Loli's rule the world.

Literally.

Originally posted by Nephthys
I've read Berserk. It is very good. But at times it gets too Grimdark for its own good. Plus its really, really slooooooow.

Nah ah.

Vinland Saga does not interest me.

That's only because it has no lolis that you can lust after. estahuh

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
No, it's because the combat is infinitely better than "mash X and square/AB/ABbecauseMicrosoftisthatoriginal until there are no enemies on screen" :/

"Wave the controller at the screen" is not my idea of good gameplay.

Originally posted by Peach
"Wave the controller at the screen" is not my idea of good gameplay.
That was Wii TP.

Attached waggle without purpose is worse.

This isn't pointless waggle, and infact, random waggling can get you killed in SS, lol.

There's actual thought when you approach an enemy, if it blocks one way, you have to attack from another way, rather than it's either 'blocking, use block breaker' or not 'use fast attack or grab'.

It's just way, way better.

Originally posted by TheAuraAngel
Well....none of the dungeons is BN2 were particularly awful that I can recall. The Freezeman part was unabashedly filled with filler though. And 3 is the only game where the real Bass has an actual role in the story. In fact, Bass is build up very well. The internet starts breaking when Bass is merely present!

And no. I don't like change. >_>

Well, it's not a sequel. Prequel. I think? Definitely not a sequel though.

Kallen is superior to CC.

Ah, so the best game in the series is the best cos Bass is there. Makes a lot of sense.

..Ive never been more proud than right now.

Hmm that could work too, as long as its up to standard.

*googled 'CC Kallen'* Yeah, Im good with a tie :V

Bass is awesome in BN and stuff.

Is partly why BN3 is da bess.

Edit: So that trailer about Bioware's next game, the one posted in here of a more modernise warzone, is of a new Command and Conquer game, by them Bioware guys.