Woohoo, official off-topic thread!

Originally posted by Peach
Personally, I think motion controls kind of suck; I'd much rather have a traditional controller.

The fact that I dislike them so much is why I've been putting off starting Skyward Sword.

I had my doubts until I played it, now I don't want to go back, lol.

thats cause youre a fanboy scream

csm

Originally posted by RE: Blaxican
thats cause youre a fanboy scream

csm

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
I had my doubts until I played it, now I don't want to go back, lol.

So you won't be playing OoT ever again? awesome

Still, can't wait for this wankage of Skyward Sword to go down.

Originally posted by TheAuraAngel
So you won't be playing OoT ever again? awesome

Still, can't wait for this wankage of Skyward Sword to go down.

Hey, don'tcha know, Aura, Zelda games stay wanked until the next one comes out. 😎 Some continue to be wanked for their awesome 10-20 years later. estahuh

OoT is the most overrated Zelda in the series.

WW and MM>

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
I will, lol. But I probably won't be replaying TP for a while. OoT improved the series with new gameplay, and SS did it again.

Hey, don'tcha know, Aura, Zelda games stay wanked until the next one comes out. 😎 Some continue to be wanked for their awesome 10-20 years later. estahuh

Almost correct. OoT didn't just improve the series with new gameplay. It revolutionized gaming in general. The step from 2d to 3d was a big one but OoT proved it could not only be done but could be done phenomenally well. Whereas Skyward Sword...added motion controls. 😛

Which is not a good thing mind you.

Of course, going from an outsiders perspective, I think Spyro is cooler than OoT. :3

Originally posted by TheAuraAngel
The step from 2d to 3d was a big one but OoT proved it could not only be done but could be done phenomenally well.

Funny, could of sworn Super Mario 64 did that about two or so years before OoT did. mmm

Originally posted by TheAuraAngel
Almost correct. OoT didn't just improve the series with new gameplay. It revolutionized gaming in general. The step from 2d to 3d was a big one but OoT proved it could not only be done but could be done phenomenally well. Whereas Skyward Sword...added motion controls. 😛

Which is not a good thing mind you.

Of course, going from an outsiders perspective, I think Spyro is cooler than OoT. :3

Skylanders.

I'd take motion controls over what happened to Spyro any day..

Originally posted by NemeBro
OoT is the most overrated Zelda in the series.

WW and MM>

Play SS, you fewl.

Originally posted by NemeBro
Funny, could of sworn Super Mario 64 did that about two or so years before OoT did. mmm

It did. But not to the same extent. Then again, outsiders perspective. 😛

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
MM is close, WW sits below the 64 games.

Play SS, you fewl.

Why? It will just suffer the same fate as TP, I'll get to the fourth dungeon or so, get bored, and stop playing it forever so I can focus on better games.

LoZ has gotten quite stale.

@BT: In the normal play through those with shields /can/ be a little predictable at times, but they can be more of a challenge later on if in groups or especially the stronger foes (Lizards, Elec swords Boko's, 4 armed skeletons etc). Personally yes, I did find the combat to be a tad easy at times. But when you get comfortable with DmD modes of DMC, most other games combat doesnt seem that hard :I [DmD mode somehow took me from crap to the best of my mates in SSB.Brawl..] It is harder than older LoZ's though.

Better to ask one of the guys that finished SS hard mode.

Originally posted by TheAuraAngel
Really BR? I love KH but it's not my favorite. It works and I enjoy hitting stuff but it can get old. Reaction commands improved it though. ^^

My favorite gameplay would be in Megaman Battle Network.

Only mean KH2 for the combat. Quick pace, crowded, lots of techniques. Last time I played was on the hard mode and it gets pretty intense with all the abilities.. though its been a while.. DMC is still the best hack and slash.

BN6 >
Net was down and wanted to play BN6 that on my emulator today.. game twas deleted :<

Except WW is not objectively better than OoT at all. And I actually enjoyed the WW engine less than OoT/MM's.

SS is better than TP. You'd be hard pressed to find a better game. 😎

Anyway, done noming your troll bait. /Gets on msn.

Originally posted by TheAuraAngel
It did. But not to the same extent. Then again, outsiders perspective. 😛

Super Mario 64 almost single-handedly launched the N64 as a system son, and was innovative in its feeling of non-linearity in a platformer, it was one of the first games to make your guy move faster by how you move the analog, and other shit I can't bother bringing up.

Originally posted by NemeBro
LoZ has gotten quite stale.

You are a cold man. With your honesty and shit.

Originally posted by BloodRain
Only mean KH2 for the combat. Quick pace, crowded, lots of techniques. Last time I played was on the hard mode and it gets pretty intense with all the abilities.. though its been a while.. DMC is still the best hack and slash.

BN6 >
Net was down and wanted to play BN6 that on my emulator today.. game twas deleted :<

Ah, I see.

I can't actually say that. BN6 is a superb game compared to the others(though, in my humble opinion, BN3 is superior) but it has the major issue of simply being too easy. The game gives you so much power and lets you run with it.

And the final boss(least in the version I played) was pathetically easy. Only LifeAura, who has not only less HP compared to the other bosses but has the bad luck of being on the end of a mega power up, is easier.

TP was stale, and I've never denied that.

SS isn't TP.

Crunchyroll needs to add R2 of Code Geass.

All of the games, mostly due to the sync variations, made you pretty beastly. Especially near end game where nothing would pose a challenge side for the few tough bosses. Think I preferred BN6 because of the beast power-up and how hax it was >-> Barely remember anything from 2-5...

Is there gonna be a third part to Geass?