Originally posted by Classic NESI wasn't comparing it that way, I explained it twice. I was comparing them on the basis that they aren't wrong. Yes I am in college, which is why I don't log on as much. It wouldn't be a smart thing for random members to assume I'm this bad person only for the fact I'm "socking", because that by itself means nothing, but I always thought people here were taught to think that way, shame. Not concerned with how a group of mind-controlled people think about me.
I got the point, but your analogy was crazy or were you comparing your desperation to post on a forum to that of a starving child looking for food? That just seems pathetic no offense, is it really that bad you got banned? Life goes on mane and aren't you in college and your young. I'm sure you could be doing something else other than trying to force posting in a forum to argue a perm ban where you aren't even welcomed anymore.Well, if they banned everyone there wouldn't be a point in having this section. You say you're defending yourself, but by socking you're pretty much destroying your own reputation and if you didn't care about it why would you feel the need to defend yourself by socking this much in the first place?
Originally posted by General KalieroWhat has yet to get through to you is the fact there has been no shown evidence that 3 (three) bans were justified, when there are others doing much worse things on KMC even up to now (go to the off-topic forum much?). Basically, you and Peach confess you can't give out any info, that's understandable, but if you want to keep saying I deserved 3 bans while not giving support...that's fine.
What you don't seem to understand is that there were no false accusations. You more than deserved to be banned by the time you actually were.
And pardon me for asking, how was this person's permanent banned justified? Because he happened to post in the wrong forum? ๐
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/f66/t496337.html
Originally posted by General KalieroWith some thrown in for mod-personal reasons, I agree.
The forum rules are very clear.
Originally posted by General KalieroWhich must mean that a starving person stealing an apple should have his hand cut off. I love your way of thinking.
Regardless of your opinion of your personal conduct beforehand, your actions now are wrong, so any argument you might have, lack of validity aside, is entirely irrelevant.
Originally posted by Bardock42Kindly show me where I was being a dick. Then I can have a reason to apologize to anyone I offended. ๐
On top of it he is not particularly nice in his conduct with members on here while socking. If he wanted to prove the point that he is a good member, he maybe shouldn't be a dick to everyone.
Originally posted by Yoshi Paradise
So, it took you over nine months to come to the conclusion that you were banned unfairly? You should have came back earlier if you really thought your ban was unfair. Well, you can't deny that you've made several sock accounts within the past few days, which is a bannable offense. Do you really think that the moderators will allow you to come back after doing that? If not, then you're wasting your time.
So, I take it you don't agree with my example earlier.
Originally posted by PeachI love how you use the word "ridiculous", and one would think, with the number of hostile/unworthy mods this forum has, a lot of warnings would be handed to people.
As YP said, he was originally known as Wandering Flame. Well, that was the last username he had, he changed his name a lot.What you guys cannot see on his profile is the fact that he had an absolutely ridiculous number of official warnings (all you can see is the final ban reason, I believe). He would constantly bash and attack people, make incredibly vulgar remarks, and spam up the forums. He also, which is what ended up being the last straw, would never drop an argument after being told to do so.
WF, you are the one that can't handle the truth. Your ban was far more than earned and took place much later than it should have. That's it.
All those accusations you just made, much similar to the ones you made a few days ago, are all a pile of crap, really. Saying you're not allowed to give out any "info" (whatever the hell that means) is just your excuse for not being able to prove a ban was justified, and in the case of the guy who posted in the wrong forum, there was no just ban. He was banned because Impediment got pissed. This is more than obvious.
Originally posted by Bardock42Like proving his boyfriend was wrong on several levels ๐. Christ what a bannable offense. No seriously, maybe you should be more aware of something rather than talking bs about it, no offense to you dear Bardock.
If you get banned by Backfire you did something really wrong ๐
Originally posted by General KalieroJust to clarify what was this? ๐
The amazing part is he actually got a warning by Raz himself. That pretty much says it all.
Edit: Nevermind, it was a wanking smiley ๐. But to be honest, I reported several smilies that were inappropriate afterwards, so no need to bring this up anymore.
Originally posted by k1Lla441Hmm...even in the case where either one of them is telling you to shut up for no good reason? Not trying to work you up or anything, I just want your opinion.
What is socking? is it when somebody creates multiple accounts because one is banned? because i find the two of you( you and GK) to be pretty leniate mods, and anyone getting mulitple warnings and not listening to you definitely needs to be banned.
And thought I should throw this in as well, there are several cases where Peach has insulted. Based on this, are mods allowed to flame? ๐ Though I can't say I like the double standards this time.
Dude, you are not some starving person staring hungrily at an apple stall. You're not a martyr sacrificing himself for a valiant cause. You're just a vulgar, rebellious individual who thinks the rules shouldn't apply to him and has decided to attempt proving that through breaking the rules some more.
Have you looked around? No one here supports you. Everyone is just rolling their eyes at your frankly pathetic antics.
What has yet to get through to you is the fact there has been no shown evidence that 3 (three) bans were justified, when there are others doing much worse things on KMC even up to now (go to the off-topic forum much?). Basically, you and Peach confess you can't give out any info, that's understandable, but if you want to keep saying I deserved 3 bans while not giving support...that's fine.
Originally posted by General KalieroThanks for showing you're not able to comprehend what I'm saying. I'm not saying the rules don't apply to me, only I was unjustly banned. No one would support me right now since either:
Dude, you are not some starving person staring hungrily at an apple stall. You're not a martyr sacrificing himself for a valiant cause. You're just a vulgar, rebellious individual who thinks the rules shouldn't apply to him and has decided to attempt proving that through breaking the rules some more.Have you looked around? No one here supports you. Everyone is just rolling their eyes at your frankly pathetic antics.
Every one of us gives a reason for bans, which can easily be seen in the user notes. Not that we're even obligated to give reasons, but we do anyway.
1. They aren't informed on the situation
2. They fear unjust mods, (like yourself, though, you would now be considered one since you don't want to realize what is just. You just adopt the popular belief because it seems right to you. By the way, pretty much the only reason you became mod was Peach was one, believe it or not. Try to keep that in mind sometime).
The user notes...are bs once again. Everyone I've talked to about this agreed disregarding ban #1.
And what's with some constantly misinterpreting my example? Good lord. ๐
No, your bans were not in the least unjust. Why are you not understanding this? They were far more than justified. You had 8 warnings. Eight! Most people are banned after the third.
No one really cares what "everyone you talked to" thinks about your bans. Hardly anyone will disagree with one of their friends when asked about something like that.
By saying that you think your bans were not justified, you ARE saying that the rules do not apply to you. Because you broke the rules. Many of them, many times. Thus, you pay the consequences. It's really that simple.
The ones who are the most informed on the situation say that you were banned for good reason and got away with far more than you should have. And back when you were banned? No one was at all surprised by it. Because it was a loooong time coming.
And if you don't want people to misinterpret your example, don't use such a shitty one.
Originally posted by HAPGMB
Thanks for showing you're not able to comprehend what I'm saying. I'm not saying the rules don't apply to me, only I was unjustly banned. No one would support me right now since either:1. They aren't informed on the situation
2. They fear unjust mods, (like yourself, though, you would now be considered one since you don't want to realize what is just. You just adopt the popular belief because it seems right to you. By the way, pretty much the only reason you became mod was Peach was one, believe it or not. Try to keep that in mind sometime).
The user notes...are bs once again. Everyone I've talked to about this agreed disregarding ban #1.
And what's with some constantly misinterpreting my example? Good lord. ๐
Many of the people here were here back when you were originally banned, so they are definitely informed. So that doesn't really work.
I'm always amused by the fact that the ones calling us unjust? Are the ones that have been acting out. And how, exactly, does enforcing the rules of the forum make us unjust?
And attacking my origins as mod, classic. Disregarding the fact more than one person has to agree on a choice, how I became a mod simply doesn't matter. I've been one for over a year now and no higher-ups have ever disagreed with a decision I've made as a mod. Despite your personal opinion, I seem to be doing something right.
Hah, I missed the attack on how GK became a mod. Which frankly, shows a lot of ignorance on how mods are chosen, btw.
I will state that yes, he DID become one because I recommended him for it. I had asked for a second mod for the VG forums because of you and all the other little trolls happily causing havoc all over these forums, WF, and because I was having a hard time keeping up with it all. I approached Raz about adding a second mod, and recommended GK because he was the only non-mod regular of the VG forums that did not already have a track record of causing trouble. This was then presented to the rest of the mods who voted if they agreed or not, and then it was instated by Raz.
So while it was my suggestion, it was not my decision.
Originally posted by HAPGMB
Thanks for showing you're not able to comprehend what I'm saying. I'm not saying the rules don't apply to me, only I was unjustly banned. No one would support me right now since either:1. They aren't informed on the situation
2. They fear unjust mods, (like yourself, though, you would now be considered one since you don't want to realize what is just. You just adopt the popular belief because it seems right to you. By the way, pretty much the only reason you became mod was Peach was one, believe it or not. Try to keep that in mind sometime).
The user notes...are bs once again. Everyone I've talked to about this agreed disregarding ban #1.
And what's with some constantly misinterpreting my example? Good lord. ๐
There is no way, at all, your ban was unjust. I havent known peach or GK for that long, but they dont go banning people for nothing. What your trying to tell all of us is that Gk and Peach, along with several other mods, gave you many unjust warnings and many unjust bannings for no apparent reason. If that was the case, i would have been banned a long time a go.
I would love for you to show me when peach, for no reason at all, told you to shutup. And its not like anyone is perfect, they may get a little ticked sometimes, but its because people like you make them that way. And when pointed out about this, they immediate apologize for the slightest problem, and get right back to work making the VG forum a civilized and respectable place. You asked for my opinion about people who tell you to shutup for no reason, and guess what, i dont like people like that. but peach or GK have dont nothing of the sort.
And you asked us to point out when you a dick, and i believe you make a dick move when you said GK is only a mod for peach. He became a mod because peach liked him, not because they were friends, because he had the skill to become a moderator and had the least record. And im waiting for the apology to GK.
Hostile and unworthy mods? what are you crazy? Half the stuff your "claiming" your only doing because you got banned. GET OVER IT. you got banned because you did something wrong. LIFE ISNT GOING TO END. its ok, i know it may be hard, but youll still live. Its called the humane thing to do. you did something bad. they warned you. you kept doing annoying and disrespecful things which lead to warnings, then you got banned. I cant believe, for someone whos in college you cant understand what im saying. You think all the mods here were unjust, and you get blamed for things that your not even doing. If thats the case, then why are you arguing so much about it??? You obviously must care about this place a lot if you want to come back so much. And if you dont care about it, then why argue?? please, im 15 and im actually making more sense then you ever can in you entire life