Took out a lot in hope to get less replies this time.
Originally posted by PeachSo warnings that state don't talk back to a mod count as justifiable ones? You consider merely posting a smiley in response to something you said as back talk, which is something indeed. Most of the warnings you mentioned once again, had nothing to do with rules. You know, on the page that has KMC's rules on it.
No, your bans were not in the least unjust. Why are you not understanding this? They were far more than justified. You had 8 warnings. Eight! Most people are banned after the third.No one really cares what "everyone you talked to" thinks about your bans. Hardly anyone will disagree with one of their friends when asked about something like that.
By saying that you think your bans were not justified, you ARE saying that the rules do not apply to you. Because you broke the rules. Many of them, many times. Thus, you pay the consequences. It's really that simple.
The ones who are the most informed on the situation say that you were banned for good reason and got away with far more than you should have. And back when you were banned? No one was at all surprised by it. Because it was a loooong time coming.
And if you don't want people to misinterpret your example, don't use such a shitty one.
Originally posted by General KalieroShow me where I flamed, then I'll show you where a mod (Peach) has. Probably then you'll say she had a good reason to 🙄 (then again, I'll show you later anyway). Kaliero, I'm against rules that have never existed (talking back to mods, and such). These rules were never part of KMC's policy. You should know this. A number of those warnings, like what BackFire wrote, were false. To him, spamming and derailing threads, as well as disobeying mod orders is the same as keeping threads on topic and asking why two mod orders contradicted. That or he didn't see the post before I was banned and didn't think twice before handing it. In case I didn't link to it before, here, I asked that question indeed. http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=395671&pagenumber=8
You were very justly banned, after being let off with mere warnings for only too long. You constantly flamed, you would never let go of an argument (your very actions right now are the same), and you would always rebel against the mods (again, you are only continuing this behavior now).Many of the people here were here back when you were originally banned, so they are definitely informed. So that doesn't really work.
I'm always amused by the fact that the ones calling us unjust? Are the ones that have been acting out. And how, exactly, does enforcing the rules of the forum make us unjust?
And attacking my origins as mod, classic. Disregarding the fact more than one person has to agree on a choice, how I became a mod simply doesn't matter. I've been one for over a year now and no higher-ups have ever disagreed with a decision I've made as a mod. Despite your personal opinion, I seem to be doing something right.
That's not attacking, I know she recommended you. Though I didn't know about the voting thing, so it isn't the only reason I see. But there's also no reason to assume I meant you weren't qualified for the job, only you like to say things that aren't entirely true, like what's quoted above.
Originally posted by k1Lla441You aren't up-to-date with what I've been saying, nor do I think you know how I was banned (and...I'm not so sure why the rest of the warnings are brought up..because if it wasn't for the ban by BF, I would be unrestricted. It's that simple).
There is no way, at all, your ban was unjust. I havent known peach or GK for that long, but they dont go banning people for nothing. What your trying to tell all of us is that Gk and Peach, along with several other mods, gave you many unjust warnings and many unjust bannings for no apparent reason. If that was the case, i would have been banned a long time a go.I would love for you to show me when peach, for no reason at all, told you to shutup. And its not like anyone is perfect, they may get a little ticked sometimes, but its because people like you make them that way. And when pointed out about this, they immediate apologize for the slightest problem, and get right back to work making the VG forum a civilized and respectable place. You asked for my opinion about people who tell you to shutup for no reason, and guess what, i dont like people like that. but peach or GK have dont nothing of the sort.
And you asked us to point out when you a dick, and i believe you make a dick move when you said GK is only a mod for peach. He became a mod because peach liked him, not because they were friends, because he had the skill to become a moderator and had the least record. And im waiting for the apology to GK.
Hostile and unworthy mods? what are you crazy? Half the stuff your "claiming" your only doing because you got banned. GET OVER IT. you got banned because you did something wrong. LIFE ISNT GOING TO END. its ok, i know it may be hard, but youll still live. Its called the humane thing to do. you did something bad. they warned you. you kept doing annoying and disrespecful things which lead to warnings, then you got banned. I cant believe, for someone whos in college you cant understand what im saying. You think all the mods here were unjust, and you get blamed for things that your not even doing. If thats the case, then why are you arguing so much about it??? You obviously must care about this place a lot if you want to come back so much. And if you dont care about it, then why argue?? please, im 15 and im actually making more sense then you ever can in you entire life
She had a reason, only there is no reason to flame in the first place. She said it a few days ago.
I wasn't attacking GK, just didn't know there were more reasons to why he was elected. Did I say he can't do the job? No, but I did say he was saying things that weren't entirely true so I called him unjust, but he was putting labels like vulgar and such some posts ago. Perhaps you'd like to comment on that.
Your last paragraph...wow...nowhere did I say all the mods are (to some extent) unworthy, because I know there are some, from my personal experience, haven't given warnings for things like asking why mod orders were in disagreement (Devil May Cry 4 thread, perhaps you're interested in checking that out).
Last thing, I do not know why some think I love this place.
Finally, Nowhere in KMC's rules does it say you can't disagree with a mod on something. That is simply nonsense. It's for this very reason why most (or some) of the warnings were handed, despite what the warnings state. Once again, BackFire's note is bs. Refer to the DMC4 link if you want to know what happened. And there's no reason to say "well, regardless of your last ban you should be gone anyay". No. I would not be restricted if it wasn't for the last ban, that's my argument. Not that the second one was also just, but, for those of you who think saying what one person (mod or no mod) believes is stupid, deserves a ban, you might as well argue half of KMC should be gone as well. As for your last sentence, that was entirely uncalled for. I don't know what your deal is.
I doubt this will be read thoroughly, since I keep seeing replies that are under the assumption I'm trying to annoy/bash when my point is some bans were over the board. 😐
I will state this very firmly for the last time.
Rules do not have to be written in stone to be considered rules. The rules don't say anything about racist or sexist comments, but you can bet that making those will get you warned and/or banned. It's called common sense.
There is a big difference between "disagreeing with a mod" and "arguing with and disobeying a moderator decision", by the way. The latter is what you got banned for.
You were never once warned for backchat, btw. Told to not do it, yes. Warned for it, no. However, you did have numerous warnings for continuing to spam/flame/whatever you were told to stop doing in the first place after having been told to stop.
So if you're going to complain about unfairness, at least get your story straight.
No one cares what rules you're against. The fact remains that you broke enough of them that you got banned. All of your bans were just, and yes, even if you hadn't gotten that particular ban you still would have been gone by now. You never showed any real desire to follow rules and behave yourself before so no one's going to believe that you would have done so while on your last chance.
Originally posted by PeachSpamming isn't the same as continuing an argument (DMC4 thread). BackFire said I was spamming, which you or anyone else has yet to admit was bs'd. And, whenever I was told to stop arguing (or, as some people call it, derail) some particular mod was doing the same thing. So, since when could a mod derail a topic and not a normal member? At any rate, it's hypocritical. As for the second ban, I disobeyed nothing. I simply stated my opinion. As one would expect, a certain mod lost control. It's that simple. Maybe you shouldn't keep saying all my bans were justified and whatnot, and instead research this stuff a bit more. I'm actually looking into the threads where the restrictions were given, are you? 😕
I will state this very firmly for the last time.[b]Rules do not have to be written in stone to be considered rules
. The rules don't say anything about racist or sexist comments, but you can bet that making those will get you warned and/or banned. It's called common sense.There is a big difference between "disagreeing with a mod" and "arguing with and disobeying a moderator decision", by the way. The latter is what you got banned for.
You were never once warned for backchat, btw. Told to not do it, yes. Warned for it, no. However, you did have numerous warnings for continuing to spam/flame/whatever you were told to stop doing in the first place after having been told to stop.
No one cares what rules you're against. The fact remains that you broke enough of them that you got banned. All of your bans were just, and yes, even if you hadn't gotten that particular ban you still would have been gone by now. You never showed any real desire to follow rules and behave yourself before so no one's going to believe that you would have done so while on your last chance. [/B]
Why should I research anything? I remember how it happened. I don't need to twist around what happened in an attempt to make myself look better. I'm not the one that broke rules time after time again.
Face it - you will never be allowed back.
And everyone else - just completely ignore him or any other posts he might make. Don't respond or anything. Maybe that'll discourage him from wasting our time with socks.
Originally posted by Peach
The main character of the books shares my name, too 😛Raz is the admin. He's the one that owns and runs the forums.
Originally posted by k1Lla441
How often do you read books? seems like you really like them. the only thing i read is stuff i like, which is obvious, because people only read stuff they like. but the problem is that the only thing i like reading is egm, which feels like kind of a waist, since im a fast reader for my age.
How much do I read?
I spend as much on books as I do on video games. Possibly more.
Does that answer your question?