Originally posted by Nihilist
I would actually take offence if you wasnt a little kid whos upset because he cant even understand the simple scan he posted.Breathing is a strength feat lulz
Thanos' mind got tougher. What a liar!
Originally posted by Endless Mike
Breathing is caused by throat muscles, which are weaker than arm and hand muscles
As covered already, but unfortunately its a complete question mark as to how far one would have to scale with that in mind, assuming an equivalent ratio of strength such as in say, a human body, exists for Superman's biology.
By feats, PC Superman's breath seems proportionately far more powerful than a human's would be in relation to their respective skeletal muscular lifting strength.
You could cause as much wind just by waving your hand vigorously as you could by blowing with your lungs. Yet I can't quite imagine PC Superman getting a star to move just by waving in its direction vigorously. lol.
Originally posted by CosmicComet
As covered already, but unfortunately its a complete question mark as to how far one would have to scale with that in mind, assuming an equivalent ratio of strength such as in say, a human body, exists for Superman's biology.By feats, PC Superman's breath seems proportionately far more powerful than a human's would be in relation to their respective skeletal muscular lifting strength.
You could cause as much wind just by waving your hand vigorously as you could by blowing with your lungs. Yet I can't quite imagine PC Superman getting a star to move just by waving in its direction vigorously. lol.
I wouldn't be surprised if he could honestly
Originally posted by quanchi112Your logic only works when discussing two characters that exist within the same fictional universe.
Feats don't determine that. Just like Drax's feats of ripping a star doesn't mean anything since Thanos wrecked him. Hulk has strength feats and then some while Thanos has shown his strength is far superior.
Within the same fictional universe, if A proves stronger than B, and B once overpowered C, we can assume A is also stronger than C.
But between two fictional universes, how the hell else do you determine who is more powerful if not with feats? If feats didn't matter, then Thanos overpowering Drax means exactly jack squat in determining if he could overpower PC Superman. Feats do.
Originally posted by NemeBroNo, it doesn't. Characters like Gladiator and Drax have feats akin to these and they don't match up. If you think impressive feats are exclusive to the dcu you need to read more comics.
Your logic only works when discussing two characters that exist within the same fictional universe.Within the same fictional universe, if A proves stronger than B, and B once overpowered C, we can assume A is also stronger than C.
But between two fictional universes, how the hell else do you determine who is more powerful if not with feats? If feats didn't matter, then Thanos overpowering Drax means exactly jack squat in determining if he could overpower PC Superman. Feats do.
Thanos overpowered and easily someone who can rip a star in half. Thanos beats him down at his weakest. Food for thought.
Originally posted by Batman-PrimeNo, it isn't. Thanos pushes his sh-t in.
Thanos loses, this is major spite, really.
Gladiator tanked a blast that could have engulfed half of a solar system and then he contained it. Gladiator was pissed and decided to swim in a gas giant without pause and after swimming, his power was described and compared to a God and proceeded at destroying a planet afterwards. Gladiator power has been described as being capable of wresting planets and collapsing stars.
Gladiator>>>all. Lol.
Originally posted by quanchi112There is exactly nothing you have just said that contradicted anything in my post.
No, it doesn't. Characters like Gladiator and Drax have feats akin to these and they don't match up. If you think impressive feats are exclusive to the dcu you need to read more comics.Thanos overpowered and easily someone who can rip a star in half. Thanos beats him down at his weakest. Food for thought.
Tell me then: How would one reach a conclusion when debating different fictional universes?
Originally posted by NemeBroYes, saying you go by feats alone is clearly flawed. Thanos has dominated characters with impressive feats from marvel. Thanos not possessing the feats has proven those are just feats in the realm of possibility within top tier heroes upmost potential.
There is exactly nothing you have just said that contradicted anything in my post.Tell me then: How would one reach a conclusion when debating different fictional universes?
Thor is a peer to Superman. Thanos has beaten an amped Thor while Superman would be hard pressed just against regular Thor let alone one with the amp from the power gem.