Pre-Crisis Superman vs Thanos h2h

Started by biensalsa15 pages

And yet you make it sound like defeating someone who rip a star in half LIKE A FEAT

Originally posted by biensalsa
And yet you make it sound like defeating someone who rip a star in half LIKE A FEAT
Feats don't really mean much I just used it as an example.

Originally posted by quanchi112
You sure acted like we have to go by feats. Thanos has gone up against characters with far greater feats than precrisis Superman.
Which is a feat in of itself, and can be used to argue that Thanos is indeed capable of beating PC Superman.

We do have to go by feats, because they are used, along with showings of characters beating one another, to get an idea of the character's relative strength in-series and objective strength out of it.

I am really not sure where this notion of your's has come from Quan.

I know for a fact you used to cite feats all the time in threads, such as when you asserted that Monarch's showing against an amped Prime wasn't special because he only destroyed a city, while you would only be impressed by planet busting (I disagree with the logic of that but have no desire to argue it here).

Originally posted by NemeBro
Which is a feat in of itself, and can be used to argue that Thanos is indeed capable of beating PC Superman.

We do have to go by feats, because they are used, along with showings of characters beating one another, to get an idea of the character's relative strength in-series and objective strength out of it.

I am really not sure where this notion of your's has come from Quan.

I know for a fact you used to cite feats all the time in threads, such as when you asserted that Monarch's showing against an amped Prime wasn't special because he only destroyed a city, while you would only be impressed by planet busting (I disagree with the logic of that but have no desire to argue it here).

My point is that the feats themselves don't really prove how they match up to the featless. That's how I determine thisnot based on blowing stars away or ripping them in half.

If you'd have read along further I said "nukes" are really plot devices varying wildly from story to story and I wouldn't put much stock in it.

You know, I just thought of something. Does Thanos carry a time machine as part of his standard equipment? Because PC Supes has BFRd people through time with his punches. One haymaker and the Titan finds himself back in the Jurassic age.

Originally posted by Endless Mike
You know, I just thought of something. Does Thanos carry a time machine as part of his standard equipment? Because PC Supes has BFRd people through time with his punches. One haymaker and the Titan finds himself back in the Jurassic age.
Hand to hand implies no bfr either way. You can't punch people into other dimensions either in a hand to hand fight.

I don't see why not, the OP just said hand to hand, Superman could do that with his physical attacks. If the OP said no BFR you might have a point, but it doesn't.

Originally posted by Endless Mike
You know, I just thought of something. Does Thanos carry a time machine as part of his standard equipment? Because PC Supes has BFRd people through time with his punches. One haymaker and the Titan finds himself back in the Jurassic age.
IIRC Thanos teleported into the Magus timeline/universe, dont know if that counts /shrug

IIRC he was pulled through some kind of time rift or using some kind of machine, but it's been a long time since I read that

Originally posted by Endless Mike
IIRC he was pulled through some kind of time rift or using some kind of machine, but it's been a long time since I read that
From what i remember Thanos contacts Gamora telepathically and say some thing along the lines of " i will now phase into your plain of existance" whilst they are in Magus timeline/dimension.

Originally posted by Endless Mike
I don't see why not, the OP just said hand to hand, Superman could do that with his physical attacks. If the OP said no BFR you might have a point, but it doesn't.
If you'd factor in the amount of punches he hasn't bfr'd someone through time to the amount of times he did you'd realize you don't have a solid case.

Or maybe it's something he can consciously decide to do or not, ever think of that?

Originally posted by Endless Mike
Or maybe it's something he can consciously decide to do or not, ever think of that?
Then provide proof, naruto. You can't therefore I win.

Uh, the fact it's happened so many times for it to be a random coincidence doesn't mean anything? It's called common sense. Thanos' strength feats don't happen every time he punches someone, so according to your logic, he's weak.

Originally posted by Endless Mike
Uh, the fact it's happened so many times for it to be a random coincidence doesn't mean anything? It's called common sense. Thanos' strength feats don't happen every time he punches someone, so according to your logic, he's weak.
I never claimed a planet gets destroyed when they fight so no I don't pick and choose. You claimed something happens which is in the far minority of the times he punches his opponents happens here. Not hard to figure out, naruto.

Yeah, and the obvious conclusion then is that he can control when it happens. And WTF is your obsession with Naruto...

Originally posted by Endless Mike
Yeah, and the obvious conclusion then is that he can control when it happens. And WTF is your obsession with Naruto...
If he can control when it happens then it's not in character for him to do so. You can't have it both ways, naruto.

How the hell does that make sense? Just because someone doesn't feel the need to use a power all of the time doesn't mean they don't have it or won't ever use it... you're really getting pathetic and irrational now

Originally posted by Endless Mike
How the hell does that make sense? Just because someone doesn't feel the need to use a power all of the time doesn't mean they don't have it or won't ever use it... you're really getting pathetic and irrational now
No, just like Thanos hitting someone doesn't mean he can control when the planet is destroyed. One writer choosing a planet getting destroyed when two characters battle doesn't mean they hit each other any harder than usual. It just means they chose to emphasize the collateral damage.

Superman doesn't do so even close to 20 percent of the time. You don't get to argue feats here. In a h and to hand fight bfr isn't an option. You need to pull yourself together, naruto.

Do you think Thanos can destroy a planet with his physical strength, yes or no?