Pre-Crisis Superman vs Thanos h2h · Comic Book 'Versus' Forum

NemeBro Senior Member

I am pretty sure he already has while fighting Drax.

Originally posted by quanchi112
My point is that the feats themselves don't really prove how they match up to the featless. That's how I determine thisnot based on blowing stars away or ripping them in half.
If you'd have read along further I said "nukes" are really plot devices varying wildly from story to story and I wouldn't put much stock in it.

By themselves, no, but they should be used. Thanos for example doesn't have a whole lot of strength feats, but regularly crushes characters who have great strength feats. Therefore, we can in fact assume that since Thanos is regularly shown to physically best those who can destroy planets or stars physically, Thanos could do the same, which can allow us to make a consensus on how well he would stack up in a h2h fight with a character from a character from another series/verse, where Thanos's portrayal in his own verse means little without feats he has or feats of others that Thanos can be powerscaled from.

I am speaking of a thread much older than the one you are, one I participated in shortly, two or three years ago. Now I suppose it is possible that you have changed your stance, but even more recently, in game versus, you used feats in your argument, such as the Archdemon manhandling soldiers.

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by Endless Mike
Do you think Thanos can destroy a planet with his physical strength, yes or no?

That's irrelevant and small time. Thanos has easily ripped to shreds foes capable of destroying worlds. That's Terrax level, naruto.

carver9 Senior Member

Originally posted by quanchi112
That's irrelevant and small time. Thanos has easily ripped to shreds foes capable of destroying worlds. That's Terrax level, naruto.

Lol...Naruto. 😂

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by NemeBro
I am pretty sure he already has while fighting Drax.
By themselves, no, but they should be used. Thanos for example doesn't have a whole lot of strength feats, but regularly crushes characters who have great strength feats. Therefore, we can in fact assume that since Thanos is regularly shown to physically best those who can destroy planets or stars physically, Thanos could do the same, which can allow us to make a consensus on how well he would stack up in a h2h fight with a character from a character from another series/verse, where Thanos's portrayal in his own verse means little without feats he has or feats of others that Thanos can be powerscaled from.
I am speaking of a thread much older than the one you are, one I participated in shortly, two or three years ago. Now I suppose it is possible that you have changed your stance, but even more recently, in game versus, you used feats in your argument, such as the Archdemon manhandling soldiers.

That's my whole argument but in comics or fiction it rarely makes sense. Say take Mortal Kombat for example we see Shang Tsung easily destroy a chopper with a fireball. When it hits his opponent it's not going to have the same effect.

The Archdemon was shown to be far superior to golems, human warriors, etc. through gameplay cinema. The same case cannot be made for Ganondorf who while formidable can't take on armies by his lonesome. We saw how that turned out against the sages themselves.

NemeBro Senior Member

Originally posted by quanchi112
That's my whole argument but in comics or fiction it rarely makes sense. Say take Mortal Kombat for example we see Shang Tsung easily destroy a chopper with a fireball. When it hits his opponent it's not going to have the same effect.

Because they are very durable.

You're assuming that characters are too frail to survive something that can destroy a helicopter while ignoring feats that show they clearly can.

The Archdemon was shown to be far superior to golems, human warriors, etc. through gameplay cinema. The same case cannot be made for Ganondorf who while formidable can't take on armies by his lonesome. We saw how that turned out against the sages themselves.

Featless armies, and Ganondorf has never fought an army by himself.

But you are still using feats to debate.

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by NemeBro
Because they are very durable.
You're assuming that characters are too frail to survive something that can destroy a helicopter while ignoring feats that show they clearly can.
Featless armies, and Ganondorf has never fought an army by himself.
But you are still using feats to debate.

It doesn't add up. I am not saying they aren't durable I am saying things like this usually don't make sense.

The point is we've seen what armies are capable of in Dragon Age by now. Part 2 is right up your alley with the feats. Dorf went down to what 7 mages. The Archdemon would rape those mages. The Archdemon was on another level than Dorf and was consistently portrayed as a teamwrecker.

NemeBro Senior Member

Originally posted by quanchi112
It doesn't add up. I am not saying they aren't durable I am saying things like this usually don't make sense.

Explain exactly what does not add up or make sense.

The point is we've seen what armies are capable of in Dragon Age by now.

Nothing your average Medieval army couldn't do in real life.

Part 2 is right up your alley with the feats.

What do you mean?

Dorf went down to what 7 mages. The Archdemon would rape those mages.

You can't prove that. Their only feat was sealing Ganondorf using a magical artifact. You are also ignoring that Ganondorf easily killed one of those mages.

The Archdemon was on another level than Dorf and was consistently portrayed as a teamwrecker.

The Archdemon had its head cut off by normal humans, and you forget that it didn't fight the army by himself. It brought its own, larger army.

Badabing Gym rat

Superman sneezes Thanos across the known universe.

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by NemeBro
Explain exactly what does not add up or make sense.
Nothing your average Medieval army couldn't do in real life.
What do you mean?
You can't prove that. Their only feat was sealing Ganondorf using a magical artifact. You are also ignoring that Ganondorf easily killed one of those mages.
The Archdemon had its head cut off by normal humans, and you forget that it didn't fight the army by himself. It brought its own, larger army.

Feats and the inconsistencies fictional writers come across when telling a story. You see in real life things have to adhere to the law of physics in a fictional setting it doesn't have to make any sense. This is common sense.

Uhm, medieval armies in real life aren't comprised of golems, mages, and what not. If you think people can cast spells in real life then take a break from this.

A lot more cutscenes with featish characters than the first one.

They bested Dorf to chain him. Dorf used the triforce of power so he used his own artifact. LOL at the double standards.

After beating it down with an army and with four party members while it was damaged before your fight, sure.