Originally posted by DigiMark007
Your points are all valid about Cap, but the difference in sheer physical stats between him and Spidey is so vast that anyone who thinks Cap should win has their head so far up his flag-waving behind, that they can't smell anything but apple pie, patriotism, and ass. It would be a good fight (like KP/Spidey should be), and there's no doubt that Cap's a lot more skilled, but Pete should once again win.
That sounds like a huge bowl of steaming hypocrisy to me; I don't quite follow your logic here.
From what I can gather:
You think that it's fine that Kingpin beats on Spidey in their fights since that's the way it's always been, and/or because Fisk is a brawler.
Yet here you have Captain America, another character who has come out on top of Spidey in a "that's the way it's always been" kind of fasion and who is a living weapon; one of, if not THE best hand to hand fighter on earth 616.
But, It's okay for Kingpin to do good against Spidey but not Cap because of the difference of statistical physicality between the Spidey and Cap? ๐คจ
What stats does Fisk have physically that puts him in any better position to fight Spiderman than Cap does?
His fat?
I mean seriously;
Can Kingpin move fast enough to dodge bullets and lazers like Cap can? Can he move fast enough to vanish in front of peaople's faces?
Can he "see faster" like Steve too?
Does he have Caps acrobatic agility?
An indestructible weapon?
Cap's fighting experience and versatility?
Can he strategize a fight anywhere near the capacity that Steve can?
He's strong but how strong? What's his best feat of sheer strength?
And if all this defense of Kingpin comes soley from how well Fisk has done with Spidey then again, wtf? Cap's ALWAYS done well with Spidey. ๐ฌ
In their first encounter Spidey wasn't fast enough to land an offensive shot on Steve. Hell, the issue before that, Cap's student in the Falcon was puttin a whoopin on Spidey's face in h2h, he just didn't have the stopping power behind his shots to really effect Spidey.
In their second encounter, the Spider-bot admitted he couldn't take Steve in a h2h fight.
Third, Steve came up on Spidey so fast that Pete was beside himself, then Parker once again got owned with a right hook knocking him on his ass, the narration even describing that Cap had dealt with more daunting opponents than Spider-Man, Spidey seeing stars while planted on the ground.
Fourth, Spidey had the iron-suit, Caps shield, camoflauge, AND a cheap shot WITH THE DAMNED SHIELD and he still couldn't get the job done; Steve had him airborne with one punch.
Fifth, well we all know how that fight went, "He's already hit me three times, I haven't hit him once".
If it's due to Fisk's feat over Cap,
I'm inclined to say that ONE LONE encounter between Fisk and Cap isn't enough to discredit Cap to be under him (Wasn't it implied that cap was a bit taken by surprise from Fisk?) at any facet or degree whatsoever, but if it's to be taken into consideration for how well Fisk would fair with Cap, then you can't just discard the feats that Cap has shown with Spidey.
In a rematch where Cap knew what he was dealing with I doubt Fisk would fair anywhere NEAR as well.
I mean Cap didn't even TRY to use his sheild offensively.
Do I even need to start rattling off the names of characters Cap's put down that Pin wouldn't stand the first chance against?
Hell, Cap got surprise-attacked by a techno enhanced Hobgoblin AND lady Dock Ock and he creamed both of them. Both Parker AND Ben Reily had problems with Lady Ock ALONE.
Sorry but there's no good reason to jusitfy that Cap absolutely can't beat Spidey in a fight when all evidence points to otherwise. And Fisk doing well over Cap once means nothing in the Cap vs Spidey debate if he was also stomping on Spidey for YEARS.
What you said: Hilarious, but less than justified. ๐