Originally posted by The Great GalenA version of amazo with no feats. Did you kmow that Batman and Nightwing also beat an amazo? Context is everything. Now how is BA going to rip her head off when Sun amped Superman couldn't? Zoom couldn't. Oblivion didn't. Kid Amazo didn't. Get my drift?
Possibly, either on or at least somewhere near his level. Regardless though I dont see how Diana can take this....he rips her head off like he did to Amazo.
I dont see why a supes, Oblivion or zoom couldnt...I think it has more to do with DC not wanting to kill off one of there iconic characters in such a brutal fashion. Diana like Batman is protected by DC, I mean we all know Supes could tear bats into shreds but we will never see it due to the status of Bats character. Diana can be Ko'ed by supes, maybe even brutally beaten...but we will never see him punch throw her head even if we all its possible.
Originally posted by Kutulu
WW and BA both use magic, so your point is moot.
How do you fail to see the easy logic? There's nothing moot with anything I said.
If one thinks that BAs punches have a magical effect on Superman (or that magic evens them up) then WW vs. BA is different than BA for the simple fact that BAs punches wouldn't have a magical (only physical) effect on WW because WW is not weak to magic like Superman is.
And by the way the point I was making depends only if someone believes that magic makes Superman vs. BA even. Its a conditional point.
Many say that BA wins because of this logic:
BA=Superman
but Superman>WW
So BA>WW
which is faulty
If not then kryptonite>spider-man from a similar logic
Others may use this logic:
Strength+Durability>>>Speed+Skill+Weapons to overcome Durability+Defense.
Which is faulty
If not then Rhino>>Spider-man.
WW wins. Otherwise you are bias and faulty.
Originally posted by h1a8😐
Many say that BA wins because of this logic:BA=Superman
but Superman>WW
So BA>WWwhich is faulty
If not then kryptonite>spider-man from a similar logicOthers may use this logic:
Strength+Durability>>>Speed+Skill+Weapons to overcome Durability+Defense.
Which is faulty
If not then Rhino>>Spider-man.WW wins. Otherwise you are bias and faulty.
You post... I read it. Why?
Originally posted by h1a8
Many say that BA wins because of this logic:BA=Superman
but Superman>WW
So BA>WWwhich is faulty
If not then kryptonite>spider-man from a similar logic
That's completely different logic.
Originally posted by h1a8
Others may use this logic:Strength+Durability>>>Speed+Skill+Weapons to overcome Durability+Defense.
Which is faulty
If not then Rhino>>Spider-man.
I don't see WonderWoman or BA in that.
Originally posted by h1a8
WW wins. Otherwise you are bias and faulty.
Preemptive ad hominem attacks are stupid.
Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
That's completely different logic.I don't see WonderWoman or BA in that.
Its not exactly the same logic but similar (as I've said).
Here it is in full form:
Kryptonite>Superman
but Superman>Spiderman
So Kryptonite>Spiderman
which is faulty
And you do see WonderWoman and BA in that if you say that BA wins.
Originally posted by h1a8
Because it makes sense.Alright entertain me.
What specific advantages do you see BA has over Diana?
I never talked about the fight... I basically directed it at the shoddy logic, and attempting to pass of what you say as a fact.
It's funny... but it's also irritating.