Originally posted by Nibedicus
This takes me back:😆
Liefield era Wolverine musta had FTL talking powers.
😆
Make your point.
The conversation Thor had with the others was more than 10 seconds. They were just standing there talking. This is common sense and not debatable.
Any arguments against it is Marvel Bias.
Originally posted by Silent Master
Are you going to post the feats or not?
What feats? You claimed it was a gross low showing. You have to prove that.
Show me where current Mangog is hit in a similar manner yet failed to be koed.
Or Show me where Mangog was hit with a similar but lesser force but failed to not be affected (like wince in pain).
Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Oh man, this thread.Anyways, Mangog wins.
No he doesn't.
Superman is stronger, faster, has other powers (like freeze breath), and can bfr Mangog.
Mangog is too overrated here. Superman>>>>>>>>>Thor in the physical department. You can't compare what Thor did to what Superman will do (even though Thor one shotted Mangog).
Originally posted by h1a8
What feats? You claimed it was a gross low showing. You have to prove that.
Show me where current Mangog is hit in a similar manner yet failed to be koed.
Or Show me where Mangog was hit with a similar but lesser force but failed to not be affected (like wince in pain).
You brought up the showing and claimed it was Mangog's average, so far you have failed to back up your claim.
Originally posted by h1a8
Make your point.
The conversation Thor had with the others was more than 10 seconds. They were just standing there talking. This is common sense and not debatable.Any arguments against it is Marvel Bias.
I love how you throw around asinine things and try and establish them as fact when you know no one takes you seriously.
😆
Originally posted by h1a8
I didn't claim anything but that Thor one shotted him. You claimed it was a low showing after I posted it.
Again, you brought the feat up as a reason for Superman winning, that means you're claiming that it represents his average...therefore the burden is on you.
Unless of course you want to admit to lowballing Mangog.
Originally posted by Silent Master
Again, you brought the feat up as a reason for Superman winning, that means you're claiming that it represents his average...therefore the burden is on you.Unless of course you want to admit to lowballing Mangog.
Then that would require everyone that posts a feat to prove it's an average.
That also mean you can never post nor talk about Thor's high end feats since they are not averages.
Bottomline: I proved it was an average showing since the other strikes on Mangog (which were lesser in power) managed to cause him pain and suffering. That means, by the suspension of disbelief, that a harder strike and in a more vulnerable area can ko him for a few seconds. What's hard to understand about that?
Originally posted by h1a8
Then that would require everyone that posts a feat to prove it's an average.
That also mean you can never post nor talk about Thor's high end feats since they are not averages.Bottomline: I proved it was an average showing since the other strikes on Mangog (which were lesser in power) managed to cause him pain and suffering. That means, by the suspension of disbelief, that a harder strike and in a more vulnerable area can ko him for a few seconds. What's hard to understand about that?
No, you haven't proven that it was an average showing, that is the whole point.
Originally posted by Silent MasterTrolling me now? I already addressed what you said here:
No, you haven't proven that it was an average showing, that is the whole point.
Originally posted by h1a8
Then that would require everyone that posts a feat to prove it's an average.
That also mean you can never post nor talk about Thor's high end feats since they are not averages.Bottomline: I proved it was an average showing since the other strikes on Mangog (which were lesser in power) managed to cause him pain and suffering. That means, by the suspension of disbelief, that a harder strike and in a more vulnerable area can ko him for a few seconds. What's hard to understand about that?
Originally posted by Silent Master
Taking mutliple hits without being ko'd doesn't prove that being one-shot is an average showing, in fact it proves the exact opposite.Now, are you going to back up your claim or not?
You are ignoring the fact that Thor's hit was much harder than all the others (and they caused pain). He built up speed and momentum and rammed into Mangog (similar to what Thor did to Galactus)
You are ignoring the fact that Thor hit him in a much more vulnerable area than the others.
One shots even occur in real life when someone strikes harder than before and in a more vulnerable spot.
Originally posted by h1a8
People here overstate his power and just think he's unbeatable. A billion billion beings is hardly unbeatable.
He is durable as hell but not very strong.
Classic Mangog was more durable but less strong.
But...
I'm pretty I've seen you argue that Supes would beat Odin.