You Cannot Prove Zeus doesn't Exist

Started by leonheartmm15 pages
leonheartmm Senior Member

zeus exists. the christians just named him yahweh. look at the rennaisance paintings of him touching jesus's/adams finger{ i think it was adam} .

ohhhhhhhhhh, yea i get it, god doesnt exist either.

lord xyz Restricted

Originally posted by leonheartmm
zeus exists. the christians just named him yahweh. look at the rennaisance paintings of him touching jesus's/adams finger{ i think it was adam} .

ohhhhhhhhhh, yea i get it, god doesnt exist either.

None of it exists until it's proven.

C. C. Cowgirl Queen of Feuds
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
How could I loss by not believing you? 😉

You loose the truth crazy

Bardock42 Junior Member

Originally posted by lord xyz
None of it exists until it's proven.
Bullshit.

lord xyz Restricted

Originally posted by Bardock42
Bullshit.
Ermm no. That's how Science works. If there's no evidence for it, it's non-existant (to us).

Shakyamunison Nam Myoho Renge Kyo
Originally posted by C. C. Cowgirl
[b]You loose the truth crazy [/B]
Originally posted by Bardock42
Bullshit.

😆

Shin_Blax Restricted

Silly feeble Athiests! Zeus doesn't exist cause t3h B1ibl3 says soez!!111111!!

Bardock42 Junior Member

Originally posted by lord xyz
Ermm no. That's how Science works. If there's no evidence for it, it's non-existant (to us).

Haha, nonsense. Whether science proved something or didn't has no effect on the existence of said thing. Try not being an idiot.

lord xyz Restricted

Originally posted by Bardock42
Haha, nonsense. Whether science proved something or didn't has no effect on the existence of said thing. Try not being an idiot.
You don't understand my point. I understand yours. Therefore, you're the idiot.

My point is that if it can't be proven or hasn't been proven, it' can't be classed as real. Your point is that just because there's no evidence for it doesn't mean it's not real. Both are true, but are two different arguments. You can't class bugs bunny as real unless there's proof a talking, walking rabbit who fits his personality exists.

Stop jumping conclusions, it lowers people's resepect for you.

Bardock42 Junior Member

Originally posted by lord xyz
You don't understand my point. I understand yours. Therefore, you're the idiot.

My point is that if it can't be proven or hasn't been proven, it' can't be classed as real. Your point is that just because there's no evidence for it doesn't mean it's not real. Both are true, but are two different arguments. You can't class bugs bunny as real unless there's proof a talking, walking rabbit who fits his personality exists.

Stop jumping conclusions, it lowers people's resepect for you.

I was just commenting on what you said. Which was wrong and stupid. What you say now, is true, but is not what you said in the first place. Therefore you are the idiot.

lord xyz Restricted

Originally posted by Bardock42
I was just commenting on what you said. Which was wrong and stupid. What you say now, is true, but is not what you said in the first place. Therefore you are the idiot.
No, I said the same thing, but more specific in the final post.

You're only commenting on me because you're upset with me. Why you feel insulting me is going to make me feel bad, I have no idea.

Bardock42 Junior Member

Originally posted by lord xyz
No, I said the same thing, but more specific in the final post.

You're only commenting on me because you're upset with me. Why you feel insulting me is going to make me feel bad, I have no idea.

No, you said "exist". And that is just factually incorrect. Just say what you actually mean and we might not have a problem.

C. C. Cowgirl Queen of Feuds
Originally posted by lord xyz
None of it exists until it's proven.

That would be the same as pointing at a random KMC member that you have not met in real life and say they do not exist 🙂

lord xyz Restricted

Originally posted by Bardock42
No, you said "exist". And that is just factually incorrect. Just say what you actually mean and we might not have a problem.
Exist: To have actual being, as in real.

Originally posted by C. C. Cowgirl
[b]That would be the same as pointing at a random KMC member that you have not met in real life and say they do not exist 🙂 [/B]
Yeah, they could be a robot, you don't know.

Shakyamunison Nam Myoho Renge Kyo
Originally posted by C. C. Cowgirl
[b]That would be the same as pointing at a random KMC member that you have not met in real life and say they do not exist 🙂 [/B]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_proof

Bardock42 Junior Member
Originally posted by lord xyz
Exist: To have actual being, as in real.

Exactly, it has nothing to do with whether it scientifically proven. Something either exists or doesn't. Whether we have discovered it or not.

C. C. Cowgirl Queen of Feuds
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_proof

Point being? 😛

Originally posted by lord xyz
Exist: To have actual being, as in real.

Yeah, they could be a robot, you don't know.

I be bot 🪩

SpearofDestiny Perfection
Originally posted by lord xyz
None of it exists until it's proven.

👇

lord xyz Restricted

Originally posted by Bardock42
Exactly, it has nothing to do with whether it scientifically proven. Something either exists or doesn't. Whether we have discovered it or not.
Do you actually listen to me?

Bardock42 Junior Member

Originally posted by lord xyz
Do you actually listen to me?
Yes.

Do you listen to me though?

I will spell it out for you again:

None of it exists until it's proven.

WRONG. Things can exist without being proven.

Things that are not proven should not be considered as existent without any evidence

Correct. But not what you said in the first place, which is why my "Bullshit" was totally accurate.

Do you understand now?