Originally posted by Janus Marius
It's not in the rules, and certainly not a reasonable request anyways. We never have an instance where an individual can be judged purely on swordplay or purely on Force powers used; they're always used together. Saber fighting and Force capabilities do count as criteria for a win, but they shouldn't be held separately as if the combatants had to go with one or the other. They link up together.
It most certainly is reasonable considering most of the fights on this forum are separated into these 3 categories.
Firstly, Kun is a "master swordsman" according to narration, which means he's at least top tier. Second, Anakin isn't a better duellist than Dooku; he's simply physically stronger and got one hell of a clever move on him. Dooku's noted as being the elder, wiser of the two and one more possessing Dark Side mastery and Light side mastery as well as being the only living master of a duelling lightsaber form. Saying that Anakin is better than Dooku (Or presuming that all of Anakin's opponents must be better than Dooku) is as accurate as saying TPM Obi-Wan > Darth Maul. In any other situation or scenario, Maul would have beat the crap out of Obi-Wan, and same with Dooku versus Anakin. This is pretty apparent to some; blasphemy to others.
How do you quantify a master swordsman and compare that to an entirely different era? You have how many master swordsmen in the PT era? Oh I see. Now you're trying to rationalize the Dooku and Anakin fight. The better fighter won. How did he get a clever move on him? Because he was BETTER at that point, when he gave in to the dark side. Dooku's reserves were dropping while Anakin's were virtually unlimited.
Kun is noted as destroying Master Vodo in lightsaber combat twice, and Ulic, a saber veteran, is unable to take any advantage over him. That speaks for his saber mastery. In Force mastery he kills Odan-Urr with a wave of his hand and makes an entire building his thralls. Tosses around Jedi knights like garbage and makes the chancellor his sock puppet. He utilizes a Sith amulet which can multiply his power tenfold and more, and can use it to demolish flesh and stone as easy as he can move his hand. He even resists an attack made especially to strip Sith of their Force abilities.
How does beating Master Vodo make Kun super powerful? In fact, where has Vodo displayed ANYTHING resembling power, other than making his wooden stick resistant to lightsaber blows? I'm not arguing Kun's force abilities, which are firmly above Anakin's, so don't pretend that I am. Instead try to overcome your own ego and bias towards everything non PT, and read other people's text.
Why would he need distance? Kun's physically strong; strong enough to ward off Anakin's Djem So/Shien strikes. He's a master swordsman who can hold his own with all manner of opponents. And his Force powers work at any distance.
Strong enough? How can you possibly guage that? And Anakin isn't physically strong? I love how strength only applies to Kun in this case. Yea IM definitely the fanboy. Tell me, which force powers of his are going to work at a close distance if they are engaged in a lightsaber duel?
Again, you're amusing. So Anakin has virtually unlimited energy reserves and he can just slip into "teh zone" like its an overcoat and outfight a master swordsman with no effort, huh?
Anakin has unlimited stamina in the rules while Kun does not. Assuming they're equals in saber combat, Kun will be worn out Dooku style, while Anakin won't. Notice how i'm STRICTLY speaking about a lightsaber duel.
Sure, let me try this:Kun is always in the zone, and he uses the Force to make Anakin bounce like a ball before using his amulet to blow off his remaining organic limbs.
Sure, that would work if:
1. Kun automatically starts off throwing around his amulet blasts. Considering he never used it against other jedi, there's no reason to assume he'll just throw it out. Unless of course, you're Janus, where nothing is illogical
2. Kun doesn't engage Anakin in a lightsaber duel. From what we have seen, that is his preferred method of fighting, so he can taunt his opponent. This is more logical than Kun going in guns blazing.
Does this make me a nonlogical fanboy like you now? [/B]
1.After reading your vomit, I can logically assume that:
You don't really read anything outside of your own text, or anything that involves PT characters.
2. You make illogical arguments for Kun such as (omg hes gonna go blasting his amulet), when it's contradictory to Kun's style
3. You calling other people fanboys when it's clear that you throw out all logic when the PT era is involved (in case you didn't get the memo, it would make you a fanboy).
4. Your assumptions that I'm a fanboy are unfounded and plain incorrect, especially since I've never liked Anakin, nor have ever shown any bias towards him. I, unlike you, can debate star wars objectively.
However, I'm looking forward to your psuedointellectual psychobabble, dr laura.