multibattle

Started by SnazzySmurph8 pages

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
I see your point.
Damn straight, you do.
Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
What? If you have less stamina you have less energy by default.

It takes energy to do work. Stamina is how long you can do work. If you drop stamina you have to drop energy.

All right, fair enough.

But then the only way that stamina could drop a strength stat is by magically lowering it so much that you would never have the energy to reach full capacity. And, even then, that's not truly lowering it, but might as well be unless you have an ulterior fuel source.

Otherwise, while stamina would affect level of energy, it wouldn't directly affect strength.

Originally posted by Soljer
If you say so.

It was, furthermore your post was not even a metaphor since you made no comparison to a human. you just mentioned cars.

Originally posted by Sandai Kitetsu
Stamina is a fourth grade concept yet you got it wrong. 😬

I haven't gotten it wrong yet. Stamina is about time and energy. It isn't about strength, as smurph and I have repeatedly pointed out.

Get it through your thick skull, friend.

Also; you can't seem to understand that if -> then is not the same as if <-> then.

You've argued this entire time that stamina affects strength, when there has been no chance to storm's stamina! You NEED to be arguing that strength affects stamina, as that is what has changed.

Yet, you haven't. Even when this was pointed out to you time and time again.

Originally posted by SnazzySmurph
It's about direct correlations.

They can in a forum thread. The situation in this thread is ridiculous, and the scenario I presented was not dissimilair.

Whether the strength it applied to lifting or not is arbitrary.

Because they lacked the energy, not the capacity. The stat Strength, is refering to the capacity to lift, not the ability at any one moment due to energy.

Well, since your talking about Strength being augmented overall, like I said. I'll concede, but realistically, that's a no.

Originally posted by Sandai Kitetsu
It was, furthermore your post was not even a metaphor since you made no comparison to a human. you just mentioned cars.

It was a metaphor.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/metaphor

"a figure of speech in which a term or phrase is applied to something to which it is not literally applicable"

Figure it out.

Originally posted by Soljer
I haven't gotten it wrong yet. Stamina is about time and energy. It isn't about strength, as smurph and I have repeatedly pointed out.

Get it through your thick skull, friend.

Stamina is your ability to do work and how long. Last I check strength feats are work, yet somehow changing your stamina will have no effect strength? Get your head checked, because a fourth grader would no the difference.

Originally posted by Soljer

You've argued this entire time that stamina affects strength, when there has been no chance to storm's stamina! You NEED to be arguing that strength affects stamina, as that is what has changed.

Didn't I say from the get go, I was talking about Stamina and strength in general. Not storm, infact I told you that I concede if your talking about storm, so why dredge that up? You were talking about Stamina in a real life context. Which is why you mention fourth grade intelligence.

Originally posted by Soljer
It was a metaphor.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/metaphor

"a figure of speech in which a term or phrase is applied to something to which it is not literally applicable"

Figure it out.

Which is why you confused it with a similie?

Originally posted by Soljer
It was a metaphor.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/metaphor

"a figure of speech in which a term or phrase is applied to something to which it is not literally applicable"

Figure it out.

Analogy is just as good. And, because it comes first in the alphabet, better.

Originally posted by Sandai Kitetsu
Stamina is your amount to do work and how long. Last I check strength feats are work, yet somehow it will have no effect. Get your head checked, because a fourth grader would no the difference.

Didn't I say from the get go, I was talking about Stamina and strength in general. Not storm, infact I told you that I concede if your talking about storm, so why dredge that up? You were talking about Stamina in a real life context. Which is why you mention fourth grade intelligence.

[/B][/QUOTE]

Because! This entire thing started because you were way off topic, and you refused to take it elsewhere. It doesn't belong here, because no one has their stamina lowered in this thread!

Strength feats are work - sure. However, as Smurph has pointed out REPEATEDLY, lowering the available energy reduces how OFTEN said work can be done - but not the fact that work CAN be done.

Originally posted by Soljer
work can be done - but not the fact that work CAN be done.

Less energy means less work, that's common sense.

Originally posted by Sandai Kitetsu
Less energy means less work, that's common sense.
Amount of work, but not capacity for work.

Originally posted by SnazzySmurph
Amount of work, but not capacity for work.

I never knew these terms were not synonymous, I'm outta here.

Originally posted by NiñoAraña
well the point is, Flash and Co. finish fastest. 😐

Originally posted by Sandai Kitetsu
I never knew these terms were [B]not synonymous, I'm outta here. [/B]
Don't twist words. If you treat the word amount as how often you can lift something, and capacity as how much you can lift, they're not synonymous at all.

Yeah, I'm sorry for derailing this thread.

Originally posted by SnazzySmurph
Don't twist words. If you treat the word amount as how often you can lift something, and capacity as how much you can lift, they're not synonymous at all.

Right, because amount is not the same as capacity. . .whatever you say. 🙂

Originally posted by Sandai Kitetsu
Right, because amount is not the same as capacity. . .whatever you say. 🙂
What a poor, last ditch effort...

It is the same as saying the number of times (or amount of times, lolz) that you can perform work vs. the capacity to perform it.

😬

Originally posted by SnazzySmurph
What a poor, last ditch effort...

It is the same as saying the number of times (or amount of times, lolz) that you can perform work vs. the capacity to perform it.

😬

Whatever you say mane, because we all know that capacity is mutaully exclusive to amount. I guess all those people who get maxed out when excersizing, and claim they can't do anymore regiments are big time liars. 😬

-Because if I can run 20 MPH when I'm fresh, then I can Run 20 MPH when I'm maxed out.

-If I can bench 250 when I'm fresh, I can bench said weight when I maxed out.

Originally posted by Sandai Kitetsu
Whatever you say mane, because we all know that capacity is mutaully exclusive to amount. I guess all those people who get maxed out when excersizing , and claim they can't do anymore regiments are liars. 😬
They can't do anymore, that doesn't change how much they can do in the first place.

Aneewayz, yu wuz pwned, dawg, 'n now yu is lyke teh booring.

Leaving.