Originally posted by Robtard
[1]No, he definitely is an idiot; I'm not the only one who's realized this. [2]What makes you think he's "getting to me",? I'm amused.[3]P.S. Laughing at your own jokes, bad form.
[4]Why did you quote my post to XYZ... are you linking it to InnerRise somehow?
1. To you, he may be acting annoying but he is not an idiot: he is manipulating you and bating you and you are falling for it...not really something and idiot would be able to do.
2. Because you seem worked up in your posts and you keep fueling someone that you think is a troll.
3. HAHA!!! You really thought I was "laughing" at my little fart joke? I'll give you a hint, and I hope this is the last time I have to be seriously abrupt because I like you as a poster:
I was laughing at how much of a whiny b*tch you were being about InnerRise and I was laughing at........YOU!
4. Nope...I was at "work" at the time and I had to stop what I was doing. I was going to comment on that fact that it doesn't take enlightenment to control America's mind...George Bush is "using an old Jedi mind trick"...duh!!!! 🙄
Originally posted by Robtardwell he is right, it's funny how upset you are getting. you say I dont answer your questions, I invite you to ask them again, and you refuse. Bardock insisted I ask mine again instead of looking for it himself, and I complied.
How sad of you... waiting all this time for someone to take a jab at me, even a pathetic unfounded one at that, just so you can jump in. Take your own advice and "grow up", Minmei.
all you have to do is ask, man.
Originally posted by dadudemon
1. To you, he may be acting annoying but he is not an idiot: he is manipulating you and bating you and you are falling for it...not really something and idiot would be able to do.2. Because you seem worked up in your posts and you keep fueling someone that you think is a troll.
3. HAHA!!! You really thought I was "laughing" at my little fart joke? I'll give you a hint, and I hope this is the last time I have to be seriously abrupt because I like you as a poster:
I was laughing at how much of a whiny b*tch you were being about InnerRise and I was laughing at........YOU!
4. Nope...I was at "work" at the time and I had to stop what I was doing. I was going to comment on that fact that it doesn't take enlightenment to control America's mind...George Bush is "using an old Jedi mind trick"...duh!!!! 🙄
No, no.. it's not just me that thinks he's an idiot. It's been well documented. He fabricates stories, talks shit, then cries when it's returned etc. the list goes on
I know you like playing pseudo-psychologist, so I'll let you think what you like about my mental state. Because really, if I told you I have yet to get "worked up", since this is after all, an Internet forum, you'd refuse to accept that your analysis of my psyche was off. Also, when did I call him a troll? I think he's an idiot.
See above; not sure where I "whined", whatever though, you must know me better than I know myself. Laugh away?
Well, you didn't comment, for whichever reasons, unlike you, I lack the ability to read peoples minds, it seems.
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
well he is right, it's funny how upset you are getting. you say I dont answer your questions, I invite you to ask them again, and you refuse. Bardock insisted I ask mine again instead of looking for it himself, and I complied.all you have to do is ask, man.
You sir, are a coward.
1) No, you didn't answer my question, you dodged and asked me a new, usually irrelevant question instead. Bardock and others can verify this.
2) I reposted my question 3-4 times, and asked a several other times... which you responded to with "I already answered it". This can also be verified.
3) I answered every single one of your questions to me.
4) Here are a fw examples of me asking and reasking, as you seem to think I "refused".
Page 14:
Originally posted by Robtard
RJ, even though we went through this for 4-5 pages last night/early morning. Let re-statement a question. There are two absolute facts, that we can see from the video, before they tasered him:1) He was on his belly and was surrounded by 4 officers, with at least 1 other standing by.
2) His hands were pinned behind his back.
So, considering those two facts, what justification can you give for the officers using tasers?
Originally posted by Robtard
For the 50th+ time, what he did BEFORE his submission is completely irrelevant, he could have shot Kerry in the nuts, that doesn't give the cops a right to taser him [B]AFTER he has ceased posing a threat.The FACT remains that he was tasered AFTER he was subdued, not before, AFTER .
To protect and serve.
Now, care to answer my earlier question? I have answered all of yours. [/B]
Originally posted by Robtard
Exactly what they did, move him away from over civilians and subdue him. Not subdue him [b]and then use a taser, which is what they did.That's the 4th maybe 5th question of yours I answered, care to answer mine? [/B]
Originally posted by Robtard
No, here, I copyied and pasted it for you again, so you won't have the burden on going back.RJ, even though we went through this for 4-5 pages last night/early morning. Let re-statement a question. [b]There are two absolute facts, that we can see from the video, before they tasered him:
1) He was on his belly and was surrounded by 4 officers, with at least 1 other standing by.
2) His hands were pinned behind his back.
So, considering those two facts, what justification can you give for the officers using tasers?
[/B]
Bardock even quoted me and asked you to answer on one occasion, besides just asking you to answer on several other occasions.
Now do what you do best.
Originally posted by RobtardI see an initial question asking how I can justify the officers using their tasers, and three more asking me why I am not answering the first question, am I correct?
You sir, are a coward.1) No, you didn't answer my question, you dodged and asked me a new, usually irrelevant question instead. Bardock and others can verify this.
2) I reposted my question 3-4 times, and asked a several other times... which you responded to with "I already answered it". This can also be verified.
3) I answered every single one of your questions to me.
4) Here are a fw examples of me asking and reasking, as you seem to think I "refused".
Page 14:
Page 15:
Page 16:
Page 17:
and it goes on and on page after page...18, 19, 20, 21 etc.
Bardock even quoted me and asked you to answer on one occasion, besides just asking you to answer on several other occasions.
Now do what you do best.
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
I see an initial question asking how I can justify the officers using their tasers, and three more asking me why I am not answering the first question, am I correct?
Originally posted by Robtard
and it goes on and on page after page...18, 19, 20, 21 etc.
You're funny... I'm done playing your games though. I didn't feel like posting every time I asked you to answer/asked a question and every time you sidestepped and then posed a question to me (which usually was irrelevant), that would have been one seriously long and annoying post.
Originally posted by Robtardypu are being way too difficult. all I ask is that you repost each question, one at a time, that way we avoid confusion.
You're funny... I'm done playing your games though. I didn't feel like posting every time I asked you to answer/asked a question and every time you sidestepped and then posed a question to me (which usually was irrelevant), that would have been one seriously long and annoying post.
simple solution to a simple problem.
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Thats what I thought. If your questions were that important, you'd repost them. Bardock asked that I repost mine, and I did. But I guess you are above that kind of civility.Now who is Dodging? Dodger.
It's rather odd that you jab/insult me in the public forum, then send me a "Friendly" PM, one minute later. Odd indeed, my friend, odd indeed.
Originally posted by MightyEInherjarthey were not arresting him at first. They were escorting him away from the stage.
Just to throw in..."An illegal arrest is an assault and battery. The person so attempted to be restrained of his liberty has the same right to use force in defending himself as he would in repelling any other assault and battery." (State v. Robinson, 145 ME. 77, 72 ATL. 260).
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
I invited you to ask me your questions, thats all. and I only retaliated when you insulted me first.
You know... this wouldn't be the first time you played your "non-answering games" in a debate, to the point where people become sick of your tactics and call/jab you on it, only to have you turn around and play victim. Seems a reoccurring theme with you. I can think of three people who have said the same in the past.
Originally posted by Robtardpost a question...I will post an answer.....problem?
You know... this wouldn't be the first time you played your "non-answering games" in a debate, to the point where people become sick of your tactics and call/jab you on it, only to have you turn around and play victim. Seems a reoccurring theme with you. I can think of three people who have said the same in the past.
Originally posted by RobtardI aint angry either, I just dont see the big deal. you obviously have questions you want answered, and I will GLADLY answer them and explain my answers to you, all you need to do is repost them.
I have no desire to rehash 15+ pages of the "was the taser justified" debate-debacle with you. You win, no, I am not angry or upset with you.
do it or I'll taze you. 😉