Heres his question.
Originally posted by Robtard
Let re-statement a question. [b]There are two absolute facts, that we can see from the video, before they tasered him:1) He was on his belly and was surrounded by 4 officers, with at least 1 other standing by.
2) His hands were pinned behind his back.
So, considering those two facts, what justification can you give for the officers using tasers?
[/B]
i think its not right for that man. i can see if the kid had a gun or knife then id approve of cops doing this. but the kid was holding his hands up wile cops forced him to the ground and brutaly tazered him. theres a diffrence between justice and arrogance and i believe the cops tazered the kid because they can.
Originally posted by Rogue JediDon't compare those two situations. They are fundamentally different.
well he is right, it's funny how upset you are getting. you say I dont answer your questions, I invite you to ask them again, and you refuse. Bardock insisted I ask mine again instead of looking for it himself, and I complied.all you have to do is ask, man.
Originally posted by Robtard
No, no.. it's not just me that thinks he's an idiot. It's been well documented. He fabricates stories, talks shit, then cries when it's returned etc. the list goes onI know you like playing pseudo-psychologist, so I'll let you think what you like about my mental state. Because really, if I told you I have yet to get "worked up", since this is after all, an Internet forum, you'd refuse to accept that your analysis of my psyche was off. Also, when did I call him a troll? I think he's an idiot.
See above; not sure where I "whined", whatever though, you must know me better than I know myself. Laugh away?
Well, you didn't comment, for whichever reasons, unlike you, I lack the ability to read peoples minds, it seems.
Robtard, I do not have any time for a proper rebuttal, but you shouldn't let InnerRise get to you so much. If you are replying with insults because that is the way you are normally, then you should be banned for flaming. If you really are upset, then you shouldn't be if your perception of him is "an idiot". Just sayin' bro.
Originally posted by dadudemon
Robtard, I do not have any time for a proper rebuttal, but you shouldn't let InnerRise get to you so much. If you are replying with insults because that is the way you are normally, then you should be banned for flaming.
If my "flaming" of others bother you so, then I suggest you "report" me, or put me on your ignore list.
Originally posted by dadudemon If you really are upset, then you shouldn't be if your perception of him is "an idiot". Just sayin' bro.
Not that you'll listen (as stated in other post), but no, I am not. It is.
Originally posted by Robtard
If my "flaming" of others bother you so, then I suggest you "report" me, or put me on your ignore list.
Demz dah rulez and I could care less if you insult someone all day.
[i]Not that you'll listen (as stated in other post), but no, I am not. It is. [/B]
So what you are saying right there is...
You are flaming someone without any care? You should be banned because you are intentionally flaming without regard.
Robtard, "(as stated in other post)" I like you as a poster. I won't be putting you on ignore any time soon. Flame away...
Also, we are using idiot in two different forms. I am using the classic definition of idiot which refers to a person who has an IQ lower than 25. (As noted by my reference to his intelligent manipulation of your conversation.) You are using the newer form which refers to senseless, foolish person. (Dictionary.com)
Buddies? 😄