Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
this is all irrevelant. at no time can we see his hands handcuffed together, when someone is arrested, they must be cuffed, duhr....we cannot tell how hard he is resisting, or if he is resisting at all.
Man...c'mon....the cops were out of line.
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
have you ever witnessed a violent arrest?
Yes, and I 've also been the arrestee in one, but I've never been tasered. What are you getting at?
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
according to Rob, I still owe him like 10 answers.even if he was not a threat, he was under arrest and had to be handcuffed. at no time can we see handcuffs on BOTH wrists. why are you ignoring the obvious?
You owe him answers. You just answered a "question" I supposedly asked, even though I certainly did not.
So what? That does not justify them tasing him. He was asking why he was arrested, he was begging not to be tased. I am not ignoring it. They just did something that was absolutely not necessary.
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
this is all irrevelant. at no time can we see his hands handcuffed together, when someone is arrested, they must be cuffed, duhr....we cannot tell how hard he is resisting, or if he is resisting at all.have you ever witnessed a violent arrest?
No, they are indeed relevant. In fact, we can tell how har dhe was arresting, see the facts posted, they paint a clear picture.
Yes, so I can judge that this guy wasn't "violent", in fact, the only violence I noticed, was the use of a taser on an already subdued man.
That makes 11 now, that I answered for you, while you're still dancing like a fairy princess.
Originally posted by Bardock42I watched the vid VERY CAREFULLY. at NO TIME were his hands together, not until AFTER they tazed him. in fact, he was holding his left arm out and away from them, fighting them the whole time.
You owe him answers. You just answered a "question" I supposedly asked, even though I certainly did not.So what? That does not justify them tasing him. He was asking why he was arrested, he was begging not to be tased. I am not ignoring it. They just did something that was absolutely not necessary.
so yes, the tasing was justified. They did it to handcuff him without injuring him.
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
I watched the vid VERY CAREFULLY. at NO TIME were his hands together, not until AFTER they tazed him. in fact, he was holding his left arm out and away from them, fighting them the whole time.so yes, the tasing was justified. They did it to handcuff him without injuring him.
"Maybe" you need to watch it again, this time objectively, "maybe?
Originally posted by Robtardyou gonna ask me again, or are you gonna continue to rant and rave like the student in the video?
No, they are indeed relevant. In fact, we can tell how har dhe was arresting, see the facts posted, they paint a clear picture.Yes, so I can judge that this guy wasn't "violent", in fact, the only violence I noticed, was the use of a taser on an already subdued man.
That makes 11 now, that I answered for you, while you're still dancing like a fairy princess.
Originally posted by Quiero MotaNow...in retrospect....do you think that was a partiuclarly good idea?
Yes.
Originally posted by Rogue JediAnd all other people in this thread that saw it just as often or more....they don't count? Do you not find it peculiar that no one agrees with you? Not saying that proves anything....just...peculiar?
there is no maybe. I saw it with my own eyes. twice.
Originally posted by InnerRiseAfter watching that video, all I can say is, you're country needs stopping. The fact that they tazered a guy just because he stated facts about a rigged election is indescribably aweful. I salute that person.
http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/09/18/student.tasered.ap/While asking his question the police just up and grabs him, he struggles, and they taser him and take him away.
Anata Wa Wakarimasu Ka.....