Student gets arrested and tasered at John Kerry Forum

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
well, when I am asked a question, and answer it, and others say it isn't an answer because they do not agree with it, I guess that would qualify as flaming too.

just as when I ask that someone restate their question, then the person refuses and talks smack about me could be flaming. when the whole time the person in question could just ask again.

If that were the case, then yes.

Funny thing that... why ask the person to restate their question in the first place? Why not just answer it the first time, instead of pulling a Michael Flatley, even then, after said maneuver, why not just go back and reread the question themselves, if they really do have the intention of answering? Also, how many times do you think a person should (is obliged) re-post or reiterate their question that's been dodged time after time?

Originally posted by Robtard
If that were the case, then yes.

Funny thing that... why ask the person to restate their question in the first place? Why not just answer it the first time, instead of pulling a Michael Flatley, even then, after said maneuver, why not just go back and reread the question themselves, if they really do have the intention of answering? Also, how many times do you think a person should re-post or reiterate their question that's been dodged time after time?

and they think it is fair to have someone sift through page after page looking for the question, and consider it unfair that they are asked to repost the question.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
depends on how bad they want an answer. If they think their question is that important and/or relevant, then it should not be an issue. By not reposting the question, it's apparent that they are afraid they will not like the answer they get.

and they think it is fair to have someone sift through page after page looking for the question, and consider it unfair that they are asked to repost the question.

So, theoretically, there would be no limit to how many times they should repost a question, that is dodged an infinite amount of times... that makes sense to you?

Bob:What time is it? (asking Bill)
Bill: Do you like ice cream?
Bob: Yes, I do... the time?
Bill: I like ice cream... do you own a car?
Bob: I do, do you have the time?
Bill: Is the car red?
Bob: No, it isn't... will you answer me?
Bill: Answer what?

If you were "Bob", would you keep asking, as you seem to imply?

Originally posted by Robtard
So, theoretically, there would be no limit to how many times they should repost a question, that is dodged an infinite amount of times... that makes sense to you?

Bob:What time is it?
Bill: Do you like ice cream?
Bob: Yes, I do.. the time?
Bill: I like ice cream... do you own a car?
Bob: I do, do you have the time?
Bill: Is the car red?
Bob: No, it isn't... will you answer me?
Bill: Answer what?

If you were "Bob", would you keep asking, as you seem to imply?

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
If Bill told me he thought he had already answered the question, or that he missed it, then yes, I would ask again. It's not that hard. Unless Bill is a flaming drama queen who gets off on putting on a huge show just for the sake of doing it. THAT is just sad.

Hahahahahahaaa...

"What if"

P.S. You said "Bill". LOL X a lot. Yes, very sad.

Originally posted by Devil King
No, I said what you said isn't what I meant. I said it's propoganda that John Kerry is being associated with it, at all. Then I repeated it.

anata wa wakarimasu ka.....

Originally posted by Robtard
Hahahahahahaaa...

"What if"

P.S. You said "Bill". LOL X a lot. Yes, very sad.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
so I take it you have no more questions for me. Maybe another puppet show?

Neither... oddly, you've said enough, Bill.

LOL THREAD KILLED

Originally posted by Robtard
Neither... oddly, you've said enough, Bill.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Okiedokie.

No real need for that, is there? Or does it make you feel as though you've had the last word?

You haven't.

Originally posted by chillmeistergen
No real need for that, is there? Or does it make you feel as though you've had the last word?

You haven't.

Rogue, you have to deserve being flamed, for me to flame you; you have on numerous occasions. You're on a par with JM.

Don't act like I flame indiscriminately, I don't, you're an idiot, so I call you one.

Originally posted by chillmeistergen
Rogue, you have to deserve being flamed, for me to flame you; you have on numerous occasions. You're on a par with JM.

Don't act like I flame indiscriminately, I don't, you're an idiot, so I call you one.

This kid deserved everything he got. The officers were following stadard procedure. I believe this guy went to that forum with and agenda to accomplish similar results.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
depends on how bad they want an answer. If they think their question is that important and/or relevant, then it should not be an issue. By not reposting the question, it's apparent that they are afraid they will not like the answer they get.

and they think it is fair to have someone sift through page after page looking for the question, and consider it unfair that they are asked to repost the question.

The question is at the top of page 25. I reposted it to save Rob and any more grief in having to repost yet again, and you the grief of having to look. So there it is....Top- pg 25. I was interested to know your answer, but now even I'm giving up after being given the runaround for so long.

Its getting to be like someone thought they were gonna play matador, only to find themselves skewered on the horns of their own dragging out of the situation.

Its just a question, just grab the bull by the horns man, fergodsakes, before the audience die of old age. 😛
And no, disagreeing with someone's answer is not flaming.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
By not reposting the question, it's apparent that they are afraid they will not like the answer they get.

And dadudemon .... do me...do me!

There were 5 cops holding him down, no need to shock him, no need to do it more than once especially when the poor lad was obviously
truly "shocked".

Arn´t there rules on this.

Surely the person must pose some sort of danger or is at least violent

Originally posted by Bardock42
And dadudemon .... do me...do me!

That's nasty.

Originally posted by Bicnarok
There were 5 cops holding him down, no need to shock him, no need to do it more than once especially when the poor lad was obviously
truly "shocked".

Arn´t there rules on this.

Surely the person must pose some sort of danger or is at least violent

He tried to voice a political opinion. He's lucky they didn't kill him.