Germans Endorse Pedophilia

Started by Czarina_Czarina7 pages

Originally posted by RUNMAN
Logical progression of the social-progressive movement? It seems like most of your closet pedophiles and perverts are, on the surface, family values republicans. Or Catholic priests.

Do you really think the German government, or any western government, would promote clit massages as a way to bond with your preschool daughter? Earth to RUNMAN.

Nowah. The catholic pedo/gay-priests were never really "priests" they were spies, incognito, out to destroy the church. Remember, if they wanted to destroy the church, they have to be a member first and then, do things to destroy it's reputation. How many NAMES of the so-called "priests" do you remember? Exactly, you never do. Same with most of these kind of sabotage-tactics, nothing but Trojan horses, esp. if the church is going against a particular social or political event.

Yes, the church has plenty of Trojans all over the place, not only the Catholic Church, it happens in any organization that goes against some sort of political or social event. As of late, the devisive issue as been about gay marriages, but this kind of trojan-tactic has been going on ever since the beginning of the church, as the church was once part of government, so it attracks similar kind of stategic events (chess games). They've always had spies or counter-spies working either for a particular gov't/church/trademan/pirots/companies (to steal the money) or to change the policies, ruin it's name b/c they want to start a new denomination so they need followers but they need ppl to lose faith first, and this kind of Trojan horse gallops it's way to top positions at different times of the history of the church. It happens in corporate industry all the time.

I remember in engineering school, there were students hauled off to the federal pin for trading secrets b/t companies, and they were caught, it's sad. I think there were pieces of space debris that some students took and tried to sell it to NASA or other companies, they were arrested too. People do things such as spy, they use trojan-horse tactics, etc.

ppl have been used as spies throughout our civilization. The church has been fair game since it's infancy during the Roman Empire. Those are not real priests, those are Trojan-priest, put there expressly for political or social motivations, usually to try to change the rules from the inside, and if that doesn't work, they allow themselves to get caught "ops" on purpose, so that everyone will do an about-face to the church, it's a crafty move but nothing new.

So all these are people who have sex with kids, just because their boss told em too...?

I don't buy that.

And even if that were remotely true, then sadly theres been a whole lot of your brand of "spying" going on since the dawn of time.

Not one bit of any spying/spy networks was mentioned in the recent sex abuse payout case to my knowledge. (Maybe institutional covering up and back scratching has been the case, no spies though....)

What's with you and "space debris"?

Not only that, Germany is going thru many issues.

1. I think that the Pope is German (correct me if I'm wrong)
2. There is a social movement, even within the gov't of Germany to work against the Church of Scientology, even though the church says they have stopped their tactics to go after anyone who speaks out against them, there are videos on you_tube that claim this isn't the case. These aren't my words, these are the words of those who think this way, I'll provide a link.
3. A female president. I think there are still issues with that, and even though the German people are ok with it, the other nations may want to defame Germany, it's happened throughout history, I can't wait until the movie "Elizabeth (the second part)", there are special issues when a female becomes the head of state, as the country will have "special" issues, esp. in political, social, propaganda attacks (they are just using the gender as an excuse, they would attack for any reason, but that gives some folks a special reason).

(and mind you, i have nothing against the chruch of scientology, this link is for you to decide what's going on with the accusations, it's terrible):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4EYS7SpFTEI

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GSUq4KGCtZ4

Originally posted by Czarina_Czarina
Nowah. The catholic pedo/gay-priests were never really "priests" they were spies, incognito, out to destroy the church. Remember, if they wanted to destroy the church, they have to be a member first and then, do things to destroy it's reputation. How many NAMES of the so-called "priests" do you remember? Exactly, you never do. Same with most of these kind of sabotage-tactics, nothing but Trojan horses, esp. if the church is going against a particular social or political event.

Yes, the church has plenty of Trojans all over the place, not only the Catholic Church, it happens in any organization that goes against some sort of political or social event. As of late, the devisive issue as been about gay marriages, but this kind of trojan-tactic has been going on ever since the beginning of the church, as the church was once part of government, so it attracks similar kind of stategic events (chess games). They've always had spies or counter-spies working either for a particular gov't/church/trademan/pirots/companies (to steal the money) or to change the policies, ruin it's name b/c they want to start a new denomination so they need followers but they need ppl to lose faith first, and this kind of Trojan horse gallops it's way to top positions at different times of the history of the church. It happens in corporate industry all the time.

I remember in engineering school, there were students hauled off to the federal pin for trading secrets b/t companies, and they were caught, it's sad. I think there were pieces of space debris that some students took and tried to sell it to NASA or other companies, they were arrested too. People do things such as spy, they use trojan-horse tactics, etc.

ppl have been used as spies throughout our civilization. The church has been fair game since it's infancy during the Roman Empire. Those are not real priests, those are Trojan-priest, put there expressly for political or social motivations, usually to try to change the rules from the inside, and if that doesn't work, they allow themselves to get caught "ops" on purpose, so that everyone will do an about-face to the church, it's a crafty move but nothing new.

This is some of the most idiotic bullshit I have ever had the displeasure of reading.

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
So all these are people who have sex with kids, just because their boss told em too...?

I don't buy that.

And even if that were remotely true, then sadly theres been a whole lot of your brand of "spying" going on since the dawn of time.

Not one bit of any spying/spy networks was mentioned in the recent sex abuse payout case to my knowledge. (Maybe institutional covering up and back scratching has been the case, no spies though....)

they are secret pen-pales that do this kind of work, they aren't' working for the catholic church and they aren't like al-qaeda, they aren't making claims b/c they aren't out to advertise their click name, if they wanted support for the click name, they would come forward, but that's not theh idea here, they want to destroy the church, so they go to prison with their mouths shut. they did their job. their job was to infiltrate the church, molest (not necessarily sexual) any aspect of it, and make it leak out when the church doesn't agree to outside pressure...the public would never equate the group that's outside of the church with the priests/nuns working incognito to destroy the image of the church. the issue isn't about sex or the "catholic" church, this stuff goes on b/t all sorts of organizations, sometimes within different denominations, ppl spy to find out how much money is in one church, get a female to have sex with the pastor, take pictures, and when the church doesn't pay up, they put out a press release, with pics. guess what the public sees? the public thinks "oh, that pastor is dirty and that church needs to go away". there are sooo many games, it's terrible. and it happens in companies all the time.

if i told you what i really felt that happened to Enron? i suspect it was an inside job to begin with. ppl investing were racist and part of a different kind of "thinking", so there was a system set up and appealed them to give away their money, and then, once they didn't "change", the system pulled the rug from them, some went to jail, but the damage was for a particular effect, and yes, it hurt a lot of lives... it doesn't have to be about sex or race or religion, it happens in all sorts of avenues. it's terrible. and this is just by best guess, it's not that i "know" anything, b/c i don't.

Originally posted by Robtard
What's with you and "space debris"?

b/c of the recent story of the meteorite...nothing new....

Originally posted by Czarina_Czarina

if i told you what i really felt that happened to Enron? i suspect it was an inside job to begin with. ppl investing were racist and part of a different kind of "thinking", so there was a system set up and appealed them to give away their money, and then, once they didn't "change", the system pulled the rug from them, some went to jail, but the damage was for a particular effect, and yes, it hurt a lot of lives... it doesn't have to be about sex or race or religion

Did wonder if it could be done in this thread.

Apparently, no subject is more than half a degree of separation away from racism.

Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
Did wonder if it could be done in this thread.

Apparently, no subject is more than half a degree of separation away from racism.

Did the same thing in the Halle Berry thread.

THE HALLE BERRY THREAD.

😐

anata wa wakarimasu ka.....

Originally posted by InnerRise
Did the same thing in the Halle Berry thread.

THE HALLE BERRY THREAD.

😐

anata wa wakarimasu ka.....

But you cling to race, and that's NOT the main idea. You miss it everytime if you only focus on race, maybe that's what they want you to do. The idea was about spying and infiltrating, NOT RACE.

And yes, HB's issue was racial, and I think I warned the readers about that, Jena-6 was a race issue, there are a lot of race issues, so what of it? We are living in a system that has a flip flop with race, as well as religion; so don't be surprised if I talk of either one.

And I won't stop just b/c you heckle me.

Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
Did wonder if it could be done in this thread.

Apparently, no subject is more than half a degree of separation away from racism.

You'll miss the main idea every time, if you continue to amplify race. If I intend to make race the main idea, I usually will apologize in advance and state that this is going to sound like a racial argument.

Originally posted by Czarina_Czarina
But you cling to race.
I cling to race? When I'm telling you how ridiculous it is to link race to every single topic on this Forum?

You're MENTAL. (No matter which race you are, it will still apply)

Anata wa wakarimasu ka.....

I lol at CC saying someone else clings to race.

Originally posted by InnerRise
I cling to race? When I'm telling you how ridiculous it is to link race to every single topic on this Forum?

You're MENTAL. (No matter which race you are, it will still apply)

Anata wa wakarimasu ka.....

Ok, allow me to explain myself better.

The topic or title could be "Group inflitration"

Group Inflitration

Outline:

I. Group Infiltration in organizations (Rel/Gov/Indstry)

A. Religious
1. Catholic Chruch
2. Church of Scientology

B. Government
1. Europe - Germany

C. Industry
1. Companies (examples were Nasa & Enron)

II. Motivation (social reform & financial)

A. Social reform
1. Gay issue
a. Catholic Chruch
2. Nazi argument
a. Germany vs COS
3. Race issue
a. Enron

B. Financial
1. Engineering students caught selling information/rocks

III. Examples (priests & students - I didn't give a clear ex of gov't except for the issue with germany and the COS)

A. Priests - working for gay issues from within

B. Students - working for financial benefit from within

C. Government - COS

IV. Techniques

[b]A. Smear compaign - press release disclosing "sexual" comprise

1. Catholic Church via priests
2. German Gov't via COS
3. COS via those calling the church the "c" word

B. Financial ruin
1. Enron

V. Types of character or personality

A. Student

B. Gov't official

C. Coworker

Out of all 5 bullet points, you only extracted and expanded on race. Why is that? Why extract ONLY race from this discussion?

Originally posted by Czarina_Czarina
Ok, allow me to explain myself better.

The topic or title could be "Group inflitration"

(TOPIC_GROUP INFILTRATION)

Outline:

I. Group Infiltration in organizations (Rel/Gov/Indstry)
[b]a. Religious

1. Catholic Chruch
2. Church of Scientology
b. Government
1. Europe
c. Industry
1. Companies (example was Nasa)

II. Motivation (social reform & financial)
a. Social reform
1. Gay issue
a. Catholic Chruch
2. Race issue
1. Enron
b. Financial
1. Engineering students caught selling information/rocks

III. Examples (priests & students)
a. Priests - working for gay issues from within
b. Students - working for financial benefit from within

IV. Techniques
a. Smear compaign - press release disclosing "sexual" comprise
b. Financial ruin

V. Types of character or personality
a. Student
b. Gov't official
c. Coworker

Out of all 5 bullet points, you only extracted and expanded on race. Why is that? [/B]

I didn't extract or expand on anything b/c I didn't read anything but the first 2 sentences and the last one.

I told you, I won't read your obscure tangents that you go on when it applies NOT AT ALL to my posts that you quote.

Anata wa wakarimasu ka.....

Originally posted by InnerRise
I didn't extract or expand on anything b/c I didn't read anything but the first 2 sentences and the last one.

I told you, I won't read your obscure tangents that you go on when it applies NOT AT ALL to my posts that you quote.

Anata wa wakarimasu ka.....

Well, if you don't completely read what you labeled as tangents, then how can you objectively decide the main topic/idea or the motive/support for the topic/idea? You'll miss it if you use that techique all the time. The reason is b/c that tech works only if the writer is programmed to recite the main idea in the first and last sentence of a paragraph. There are so many different writing styles, it's better not to default to first and last, unless you are familiar with the author.

The explanation or support for an argument or idea is mostly hidden within the paragraph. If you skip the meat or the center of the paragraph, you may inadvertently misinterpret the author's intent or motive for their argument. The issue is about trust. Do you trust that the author has good intentions in disclosing a different motivation then you? Or are they trying to program or sway you, and you are in fear of being persauded? If you distrust the author's motivation, you maybe less inclined to read it, therefore, you skip the center. That's my best guess. And I tend to write in run-on sentences, so that usually lasts for the entire paragraph, in case readers like you come along.

Well, my outline is full of mistakes, anyway,

V. Types of {wrong:character or personality} spies:

A. Students (stealing rocks/debris)

B. Gov't officials (Germany: issue with COS)

C. Coworkers (-)

D. Priests/Nuns (Catholic Chruch)

(my computer froze when i went back to edit), sorry for tpl posting:

Well, my outline is full of mistakes, anyway,

V. Types of spies {wrong:character or personality}:

A. Students (stealing rocks/debris: motivated by money)

B. Gov't officials (Germany vs. COS: motivated by social reform, argument over German idea that COS is a "c" organization)

C. Coworkers (Enron: motivated by social reform, racial)

D. Priests/Nuns (Catholic Chruch vs Priests: : motivated by social reform, sexual)

here's what i think, there are two sides to an issue, and you have to see both in order to make an objective opinion...

here are links about COS (Church of Scientology), it's up to you to decide if the recent issues with the German head of state is related to this, or if it's about the fear of a female president of the USA, and b/c

1. anti-feminism = cause ppl to dislike Hilary

2. race division in headlines = cause ppl to color code their politicians, less blacks to vote for Hilary

3. defame a female head of state and use her as an "example" = can't trust a female president

(oh, and guess what? i am NOT voting for Hilary, i'm not stating this stuff b/c i support Hilary, i am stating this stuff b/c the tactics seem to be very harsh)

feminism was under attack for a while b4 the race issue...but ppl get desynthesized with controversy, race is getting to be a boring issue (our minds get bored with the same controversy and doesn't pull it's same weight if repeated too may times), so since race can't divide as nicely b/c if more blacks think in terms of color and not concept, they will be less likely to vote for Hilary, so, what's the next game? the nexus b/t this article and the female head of state in Germany may cause ppl to lose faith in her simply b/c she is female, and therefore, lose faith in voting for Hilary.

not sure about COS, but you should see both aspects in order to make up your own mind:

(and no, i do not support the negative or positive arguments):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RygvwX-tsss&mode=related&search=

issue...http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w_D2URuJESI&NR=1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rCGP-0545EU

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XW8eTe_Ank8

cult awareness program: (cap) supposedly purchased that non-profit company and uses ppl into pretend as if they are anti-scientology to gather a list of ppl who are speaking against them (not sure if that's true, and i am not speaking for or against any group, make up your own mind):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoASMyv9Cek&mode=related&search=

I agree with InnerRise.

CC, you're MENTAL.

Originally posted by The Grey Fox
I agree with InnerRise.

CC, you're MENTAL.

ur adding value to the discussion again?