Originally posted by Bardock42
Statistically possible.
The issue with young girls is the "age" & the historical consequences.
Let's take European history, when men went after young girls(below age 16), and sought them as wives and to bare children, the entire culture seemed to be dumbed down. Girls weren't well read, they were hardly educated (as you don't need to learn to read to screw), and the biggest issue was that most men felt that women were dumb. Well, sure, if you are screwing a 7-16 year old girls and labeling them women, OF COURSE. I think that most of the complaints of "women" (who were really little girls, was as follows):
girls meaning in the age of 16 and below....
1. girls (they mislabeled as women) are infantile
2. girls (they mislabeled as women) are emotional and not logical
3. girls (they mislabeled as women) are stupid and unable to run a home.
The girls rarely have options in their mate, the MEN have an upper hand on her for at least 15 years, and by then, she's maybe tossed aside.
Sexual pleasure is frowned upon, esp. if she's not given an option to be sexual with the kind of person she finds attractive.
There were many cases of "ran away brides" or snatching girls from their homes and marrying them off, no connection to family and forced to marry the guy who stole the daughter away, this has happened in the USA in the old South (sorry Southerners, I know you have good parts of your history).
Females tend to control the social scene, if a girl is running the house hold, the children aren't going to be as smart. The only reason the upper class were smart is b/c the upper class had the option of getting educated and the "time" to wait, they had better health, so they didn't need to marry off at 8 years old or 14 years old. That was for the ones who lacked the upper class culture, and what I mean by culture is the mantra or seeds that's planted in the hearts and mind of the person, it's the practice of a particular "order" or "structure". A little girl probably won't have those kind of understanding, and so, she'll be at the grown man's wimp, usually used for sex, as even in Asian countries, the grown men use the little girls for sex and she's tossed away once he's done or bored. You can't build a good society when girls are raising children. Sorry, I could be wrong, and if I am, it's ok, as this is only my opinion based on history.
Originally posted by Czarina_Czarina
The issue with young girls is the "age" & the historical consequences.Let's take European history, when men went after young girls(below age 16), and sought them as wives and to bare children, the entire culture seemed to be dumbed down. Girls weren't well read, they were hardly educated (as you don't need to learn to read to screw), and the biggest issue was that most men felt that women were dumb. Well, sure, if you are screwing a 7-16 year old girls and labeling them women, OF COURSE. I think that most of the complaints of "women" (who were really little girls, was as follows):
girls meaning in the age of 16 and below....
1. girls (they mislabeled as women) are infantile
2. girls (they mislabeled as women) are emotional and not logical
3. girls (they mislabeled as women) are stupid and unable to run a home.The girls rarely have options in their mate, the MEN have an upper hand on her for at least 15 years, and by then, she's maybe tossed aside.
Sexual pleasure is frowned upon, esp. if she's not given an option to be sexual with the kind of person she finds attractive.
There were many cases of "ran away brides" or snatching girls from their homes and marrying them off, no connection to family and forced to marry the guy who stole the daughter away, this has happened in the USA in the old South (sorry Southerners, I know you have good parts of your history).
Females tend to control the social scene, if a girl is running the house hold, the children aren't going to be as smart. The only reason the upper class were smart is b/c the upper class had the option of getting educated and the "time" to wait, they had better health, so they didn't need to marry off at 8 years old or 14 years old. That was for the ones who lacked the upper class culture, and what I mean by culture is the mantra or seeds that's planted in the hearts and mind of the person, it's the practice of a particular "order" or "structure". A little girl probably won't have those kind of understanding, and so, she'll be at the grown man's wimp, usually used for sex, as even in Asian countries, the grown men use the little girls for sex and she's tossed away once he's done or bored. You can't build a good society when girls are raising children. Sorry, I could be wrong, and if I am, it's ok, as this is only my opinion based on history.
So this is restricted to Europe? Four words.
Great. Balls. Of. Fire.
Jerry Lee would be proud.
Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
So this is restricted to Europe? Four words.
Great. Balls. Of. Fire.Jerry Lee would be proud.
you guys are terrible, I think I mented the old south and Asia....wow, you take one part and then label a person based on it.
I could have mentioned the inner city problems with teen pregnancy or leaders who had issues with under age sex; but someone in the political-racial-machine would then ask me why am I always talking about race, so I didn't mention it.
There were many cases of "ran away brides" or snatching girls from their homes and marrying them off, no connection to family and forced to marry the guy who stole the daughter away, this has happened in the USA in the old South (sorry Southerners, I know you have good parts of your history).
...as even in Asian countries, the grown men use the little girls for sex and she's tossed away once he's done or bored. You can't build a good society when girls are raising children. Sorry, I could be wrong, and if I am, it's ok, as this is only my opinion based on history
Originally posted by Czarina_Czarinagirls meaning in the age of 16 and below....
1. girls (they mislabeled as women) are infantile
2. girls (they mislabeled as women) are emotional and not logical
3. girls (they mislabeled as women) are stupid and unable to run a home.
I can think of a few females aged over 16 to whom that applies.
Mentioning no namesyou.