Originally posted by Alfheim
yes it ****ing does because thats what I ****ing meant and thats what he was implying. The parents were stupid **** it.
He wasn't implying that she deserves to be killed and molested, fact.
Originally posted by Alfheim
No not ****ing okREAD IT!!!!!! Stop ranting read, let the god damn thing sift throguh your mind then make a comment.
A: The stupid parent left the doors wide open.
B: What so the kid should get moletsed and raped?
Yes, exactly. How did you get that from "The stupid parents left the doors open."? He's saying they should have maybe expected that their child wasn't entirely safe, not that she definitely deserved rape and molestation, which is what you decided he meant, then said he didn't mean.
Originally posted by Alfheim
Dunno man something tells me if you made an effort you could see that means "what so the kid should suffer because of the parents stupdity" ie if the parents were with kid when mad got snatched the police would be less pissed off and would try harder.
No, you made a stupid deduction and you have been proven to be wrong.
-AC
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
He wasn't implying that she deserves to be killed and molested, fact.Yes, exactly. How did you get that from "The stupid parents left the doors open."? He's saying they should have maybe expected that their child wasn't entirely safe, not that she definitely deserved rape and molestation, which is what you decided he meant, then said he didn't mean.
No, you made a stupid deduction and you have been proven to be wrong.
-AC
Its not just that post it his earlier post as well I already explained.
Originally posted by grey fox
No.They need to accept the fact that their child is dead, well... dead or being currently used by sick people for their own perverse needs.
The police want them gone and this thing over with because it reveals how truly inept they are. Everyone wants this sordid mess to be over with save for the parents who keep on pushing .
This post and the other post implies. The parents were stupid **** it forget about it.
Originally posted by Alfheim
Its not just that post it his earlier post as well I already explained.This post and the other post implies. The parents were stupid **** it forget about it.
YES. It implies they were stupid, not that she deserves to be killed and molested, which is what YOU got out of it, what YOU said he meant.
You then retracted it, you were wrong.
-AC
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
YES. It implies they were stupid, not that she deserves to be killed and molested, which is what YOU got out of it, what YOU said he meant.
FOR THE LOVE OF GOD!!!! ITS NOT JUST ABOUT THE PARENTS BEING STUPID ITS ABOUT THEM GIVING UP. ITS ABOUT THE PËOPLE GIVING UP BECAUSE THE PARENTS WERE STUPID.
DO THE MATH.
A. The police want to give up on the kid because the parents were stupid. The parents should accept that mads dead, they were stupid anyway.
B. What so she deserves to be molested and raped? ie (what they should give up on the kid.......for **** sake!)
If you cant get that I cant help you anymore.
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
You then retracted it, you were wrong.-AC
To be quite frank I dont think I should have.
Originally posted by Alfheim
FOR THE LOVE OF GOD!!!! ITS NOT JUST ABOUT THE PARENTS BEING STUPID ITS ABOUT THEM GIVING UP. ITS ABOUT THE PËOPLE GIVING UP BECAUSE THE PARENTS WERE STUPID.DO THE MATH.
A. The police want to give up on the kid because the parents were stupid. The parents should accept that mads dead, they were stupid anyway.
B. What so she deserves to be molested and raped? ie (what they should give up on the kid.......for **** sake!)
If you cant get that I cant help you anymore.
Oh stop being an idiot.
Look, this: "What so she deserves to be molested and raped?" is entirely different to this: "what they should give up on the kid?".
They are two entirely different questions. You said and meant the first, you were wrong, he never implied that, ever. You got it out of his post for NO reason and were proven wrong. You were wrong to say it.
-AC
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Oh stop being an idiot.Look, this: "What so she deserves to be molested and raped?" is entirely different to this: "what they should give up on the kid?".
They are two entirely different questions. You said and meant the first, you were wrong, he never implied that, ever. You got it out of his post for NO reason and were proven wrong. You were wrong to say it.
-AC
Forget it. Next time i'll try to be more precise when I type a post.
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
It's not about context.You suggested something completely wrong.
-AC
Anyway I edited my post...maybe your right. I dunno I personally got the impression he was saying "**** it the parents were stupid. Oh well thats life, these things happen."
Originally posted by Alfheim
Forget it. Next time i'll try to be more precise when I type a post.
Moving on. I think the police and the parents shouldnt give up looking for her.
Originally posted by Alfheim
Anyway I edited my post...maybe your right. I dunno I personally got the impression he was saying "**** it the parents were stupid. Oh well thats life, these things happen."
Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
In any case, saying 'they should give up on the kid'- which is, lest we forget, not exactly what he said- is not the same as the bizarre conclusion at which you arrived.
😕 Why bother?
Originally posted by ZebedeeLooks like the Police may finally have evidence linking the prime subject to this. When I made this thread so long ago, I wished for the McCann's to finally get peace and be vindicated.
Yesterday it emerged Portuguese detectives are working on the bizarre theory that the McCanns hid their daughter’s body in their hire car THREE MONTHS after she was reported missing.http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2005320001-2007450182,00.html
That poor family.