i'm still confused -- when you read the thing v wolverine thread, it is ackowledged by pretty well everyone that the fight can go either way. now skill and durability wise thing and namor are pretty close imo. speed to namor and a slight strength advantage as well, but namor and ben fights have been classics and are usually pretty damn close.
so . . .
if you can accept wolverine beating ben, why would it be such a stretch for him to beat namor? is it the speed advantage that is the biggest difference? or do most on this thread think (despite several showings) that wolvie shouldn't be able to beat ben?