Originally posted by MJOILNIRAnd has a rate of fire of 550 rounds per minute.
Not that it matters but that writer is way the hell off on the speed. An M-60 fires a .308 round which is around 2700/fps or around 1840 miles per hour.. 😎
550/60=9.167 rounds per second
so that gun hes using fires slower bullets and more of them.
Originally posted by BlackJackalsym, you still need to answer this. blackjackal styled on you. jawdrop
Yes, but I have no problems sleeping at night and know my place in the larger universe. You, on the other hand are a sycophant, lackey, and a colossal waste of time and space. The very existence of you flies right in the face of the intelligent design theory. So, as an abomination in the face of the Almighty, your own views are equally meaningless, if not more so.
For anyone who has a problem with what I said to Quan.....
He has continually posted low feats which go against the majority of showings just to support his case. That's against the rules. Pointing out another person's behavior to justify something doesn't work with me. I handle each report on an individual basis based on past problems. I would say the same thing to people who continually posted low end Thanos feats. The Boneclaw incident comes to mind. Or the SS/BP armbar feat. The fact that I've personally talked with him about this numerous times and his report, warning and ban record support my post. Any more questions or discussion should be taken off the threads and to a PM.
BlackJackal, I don't even know who you are. But the insults, flaming and trolling will not be tolerated.
Horrorwolf, your name has been in the reports with considerable regularity the past few days. I suggest you relax a bit. If you see any problems or feel you're being harassed then PM me with a link or use the report.
This isn't up for debate or discussion on a thread. Quan's history on KMC is what got him in trouble several times and is why I said something to him. I'm not here to be popular but maintain some consistency and order on the forum.
Originally posted by BlackJackal
Just off the top of my head I have seen Avlon use low feats to describe Surfers reaction speed and that is fine, but when quan puts up a scan you call it low-balling. That my "friend" is a double-standard. He bashes and flames all the time but since you are a fellow supporter of Superman and his friend you let it go. He posts all kinds of insults and nothing is ever said. Its all about popularity. If quan isn't insulting anyone and is posting evidence its his right to do so. THAT is the point.
In the name of Justice, you cant let Avlon do it yet threaten quan with a permanent ban, Its completely unfair.
Its just a corruption of the public perception that the little glass humanoids don't want any stones rained upon their fragile little world and an opportunity to get rid of someone they don't like.
If I got rid of everyone I didn't like or ticked me off, none of you would be left to read this. So in closing, spare me.
Originally posted by darthgoober
I'm in no way supporting Quan's use of a low end feat against Supes, but it's not as if he's the only one doing it in this thread. The whole reason that scan got brought up was because of Supes's fans continuously bringing up the BP armbar as proof that Surfer has no levels of super speed in combat despite repeatedly posted scans showing his blocking energy blast after they're fired, tracking/responding to an opponent in mid teleportation, fighting at highspeeds against Deathurge and Nova, and using super speed against the Hulk while OFF his board as well as numerous scans demonstrating his high levels of mental processing speed.
Except none of it is quantifiable proof of great battle speed. If there was a quick n easy scan or numerous scans that actually easily dispelled the BP reaction time incident in battle, they would have been posted and I doubt there would be any complaints, but since there aren't... SS fans want to scapegoat me.
I'm not having it. I used the scan in a nice long post with multiple scans and reasonable explanation.
Difference is, the SS supporters were posting scans out of spite which is completely different. Oh, and with scans with names like "Supessucks" of course no bias is shown, correct?
Originally posted by darthgoober
I'm not defending quan's argument but he's not the only one that should be reprimanded if that is what's called for in this particular situation.
Correct. Let's reprimand everyone who belives SS is a perfect 10/10 winner and has absolutely no weaknesses in battle at all and won't accept anything less. Your post is quite defensive of Quan. That disclaimer doesn't hide that.
I'll leave this alone from this point on as it's off topic. As I've stated for a while already, either SS or Supes can take it on any given day.
Originally posted by Philosophía
Here's Magneto reacting to Nightcrawler in mid teleportation, managing to attack him the moment he got there. Similar, eh ?Damn, I never knew Magneto had the speed to keep up with Superman dur
http://img504.imageshack.us/img504/6231/silversurfer198902312rp5.jpg
Its like the difference between hittin a baseball while knowing where its aimed at, no need to swing it just stick the bat where the baseball is going to be, can even do it blind folded. It would be near to impossible not knowing where the ball is aimed at to hit it blindfolded..lol
Originally posted by Ambient
The difference between the above scan w/ Mags and Surfers scan below is that Mags actually is able to fortell Kurts destination before hand allowing more time to take action non the less a very impressive feat while Surfer needed to triangulate process all the info into his mind the trajectory of the opponent then take action, much shorter time to respond.. This scan incontrast to the other few scans with Surfer disp. of reaction/reflex paired w/ his durability makes us (Surfer's fans) think he can keep up with Supes blitziz and the likes..http://img504.imageshack.us/img504/6231/silversurfer198902312rp5.jpg
Its like the difference between hittin a baseball while knowing where its aimed at, no need to swing it just stick the bat where the baseball is going to be, can even do it blind folded. It would be near to impossible not knowing where the ball is aimed at to hit it blindfolded..lol
No. Pretty much the only difference is that Silver Surfer saw and calculated his trajectory (Thus Surfer saying "But since I'm able to see his movement, [i]I can calculate his trajectory[/i]), thus he too knew the location where his adversary would be, while Magneto sensed and knew the destination in which his opponent would arrive.
So let's rewind a little bit.
They both reacted during the teleportation.
They both knew where the opponent would be before the oponnent arrived there.
They both attacked the opponent once he arrived at the spot he wanted to.
It's really quite simple.
Originally posted by fangirl101
Alot of times in the review of law, if a behavior is found out to be incindatory of bad behavior of others who have been punished, thier punishment is reversed or lessoned. Case in point, A child gets suspended from school for cussing a teacher out. Several suspended students later, and there is a review. If the teacher is found to be brash, and inciting this kind of behavior, the suspensions are wiped out and if any expulsions are issued, reversed.
your point being?
you think we're being unfair to quan? if anything we're lenient. trust me, there's a list a mile long of people who we don't pursue, because we don't want to be seen as being unfair. so we only go after those who go too far. quan is one of those people, whether he believes it or not.
Originally posted by BlackJackal
You sound like a Republican.
I don't care for majorities, they are sheep being lead to a slaughter.
It was my conjecture that you were in violation of civil liberties. If you humes get your panties in such a twist over something so trivial, its no wonder people can't deal with real world issues.
And lastly, you don't know the extent of my knowledge base. That is just YOUR opinion.
real world issues? such as?
also, i lol'd at the republican comment, thx for that... i'll make sure to include that in my next george bush sig... oh.
Silver Surfer pwns superman. Superman is to slow, to weak, and won't survive this.
Superman could barely handle doomsday, darkseid, mongul and my personal favorite toyman.
Silver Surfer takes on galactus, Aegis, Thor in warriors madness, Thanos, and many other threats that would make superman call the jla for backup. Superman also has trouble reaching above speeds light and has only been seen to blitzing beings that he he couldn't beat any other way. He still couldn't hurt them. Silver Surfer would shrug off supermans hits and he has been seen traveling earth looking for Shanzar I believe in a matter of seconds.
Supermans fastest speed feat is changing his cloths...
Silver Surfer wins why would anybody honestly think a guy like Superman could actually be a challenge to a guy like Silver Surfer who could destroy planets or take people like Durok the Destroyer to the end of time or I think it was a barren waste land.
Originally posted by Raoul
your point being?you think we're being unfair to quan? if anything we're lenient. trust me, there's a list a mile long of people who we don't pursue, because we don't want to be seen as being unfair. so we only go after those who go too far. quan is one of those people, whether he believes it or not.
Originally posted by fangirl101
You totally misunderstood me. I'm saying that from reading older threads, quan has been in violation for a very long time. And I noticed other posters who have been banned and reported due to or partly due to him. Im saying that once Quan's behavior was reviewed and the pattern noticed, those who were banned should be allowed to return. It's called reversal of punishment by new rule of law.
oh. and no, i don't think so. if it was an extreme case, then it might be worth considering, but responding to someone and sinking to their level isn't actually that excusable.
also, for anyone else, just fyi.
modding is, at best, a thankless job. whether bada and i are harsh or not, we're getting people on our backs constantly. yes, its part of the job, and we accept that. but i'm pretty sure i speak for both bada and i when i say this. we're in charge. we do the best job we can to keep the forum running with what little resources we have. people cause too much trouble, and we have to crack down.
this isn't about superman. i don't like wolverine, he's pretty much my most disliked character in comics for about 20 years now. but how often do i go after the people who support him as a character? the problem is that quan has, for a very long time now, had a petty vendetta against one character. hell, ive said before that i back surfer in this fight, and thats something i rarely go back on, if at all.
so again, here's me explaining myself when i really shouldn't have to. yes, i am accountable, to anyone on this forum, all you have to do is TALK TO ME. don't assume that just because i'm a mod that i'm inherently bad or corrupt. for 3 years i was a poster on this forum just like everyone else. i debated just like everyone else, i had fun. being a mod means i can't debate as much as i used to, but it doesn't mean i'm not entitled to call someone out when i see them do wrong.
if i really was as bad as people think, a hell of alot more people would be banned from this forum.
Fangirl, maybe you missed this post.
Originally posted by Badabing
For anyone who has a problem with what I said to Quan.....He has continually posted low feats which go against the majority of showings just to support his case. That's against the rules. Pointing out another person's behavior to justify something doesn't work with me. I handle each report on an individual basis based on past problems. I would say the same thing to people who continually posted low end Thanos feats. The Boneclaw incident comes to mind. Or the SS/BP armbar feat. The fact that I've personally talked with him about this numerous times and his report, warning and ban record support my post. Any more questions or discussion should be taken off the threads and to a PM.
BlackJackal, I don't even know who you are. But the insults, flaming and trolling will not be tolerated.
Horrorwolf, your name has been in the reports with considerable regularity the past few days. I suggest you relax a bit. If you see any problems or feel you're being harassed then PM me with a link or use the report.
This isn't up for debate or discussion on a thread. Quan's history on KMC is what got him in trouble several times and is why I said something to him. I'm not here to be popular but maintain some consistency and order on the forum.
Originally posted by Badabing
Fangirl, maybe you missed this post.This means the debate and discussion has ended. Period. Raoul is a mod and can address posts as he sees fit. We are all responsible for our own actions. If a person is banned then it's on them. Nobody "makes" people break rules or act inappropriately.
Originally posted by BlackJackal
Man, you guys take the whole pissed off nerd thing to a whole new dimension, let alone level. I can practically smell the feces oozing out of your pores, you are so full of crap.
You are going to ban someone whose opinion is different than yours just because he finds a flaw in your "unassailable" ideas about a work of FICTION! I mean how immature can you possibly be ? I don't even know why I bother to read what you brain-doners think.
KMC is about as unfair a forum for polite debate as the current presidential campaigns being run. You restrict one person's right to free speech because you seem to think it "offensive", but you protect the freedoms of anyone who shares the opinion of the establishment.
Bravo. The terrorists have won. This is how liberty dies, with frustrated and ill-formed intellects smashing ham-fisted digits on a keyboard. Don't like what my opinions are ? Take it up with the boss. I don't have to play nice with others.None of you are worth saving.
Who the Hell are you to tell a mod off? and you don't even know Quan's history here. So don't even bother to start sticking your noise in other people issues.
