darthgoober
Senior Member
Originally posted by Avlon
Except none of it is quantifiable proof of great battle speed. If there was a quick n easy scan or numerous scans that actually easily dispelled the BP reaction time incident in battle, they would have been posted and I doubt there would be any complaints, but since there aren't... SS fans want to scapegoat me.
There are quick and easy scans and most of them HAVE been posted(repeatedly in fact), you just choose to ignore them. It’s very, very simple…
If Surfer can track and react to someone TELEPORTING behind him…
http://img504.imageshack.us/img504/6231/silversurfer198902312rp5.jpg
…then he should be able to react to a street level character with no actual super speed like BP try to leap behind him.
If he can block energy blast after they’re fired…
http://img60.imageshack.us/img60/4254/silversurferannual0124re5.jpg
Dodge energy blast after they’re fired while on his board…
http://img524.imageshack.us/img524/6328/silversurferannual0624rx0.jpg
http://img505.imageshack.us/img505/37/silversurferannual0625rl2.jpg
Duck beneath energy blast after they’re fired while OFF his board…
http://img60.imageshack.us/img60/8656/silversurferv306409hn2.jpg
…then BP’s speed shouldn’t be a problem for him unless Bp moves faster than the energy blast in question.
If he can simultaneously grab both DD and Spiderman by the throat when they go swinging in on him…
http://img244.imageshack.us/img244/9884/silversurferv3128p14pa4.jpg
http://img524.imageshack.us/img524/8136/silversurferv3128p17tx7.jpg
…then he should be able to do the same to BP.
Originally posted by Avlon
I'm not having it. I used the scan in a nice long post with multiple scans and reasonable explanation.Difference is, the SS supporters were posting scans out of spite which is completely different. Oh, and with scans with names like "Supessucks" of course no bias is shown, correct?
Difference? Did you not read Bada’s post…
Originally posted by Badabing
For anyone who has a problem with what I said to Quan.....He has continually posted low feats which go against the majority of showings just to support his case. That's against the rules. Pointing out another person's behavior to justify something doesn't work with me. I handle each report on an individual basis based on past problems. I would say the same thing to people who continually posted low end Thanos feats. The Boneclaw incident comes to mind. Or the SS/BP armbar feat. The fact that I've personally talked with him about this numerous times and his report, warning and ban record support my post. Any more questions or discussion should be taken off the threads and to a PM.
BlackJackal, I don't even know who you are. But the insults, flaming and trolling will not be tolerated.
Horrorwolf, your name has been in the reports with considerable regularity the past few days. I suggest you relax a bit. If you see any problems or feel you're being harassed then PM me with a link or use the report.
This isn't up for debate or discussion on a thread. Quan's history on KMC is what got him in trouble several times and is why I said something to him. I'm not here to be popular but maintain some consistency and order on the forum.
See the only “differences” between what you're doing and what quan did is that quan has been warned before and HE gets reported.
Originally posted by Avlon
Correct. Let's reprimand everyone who belives SS is a perfect 10/10 winner and has absolutely no weaknesses in battle at all and won't accept anything less. Your post is quite defensive of Quan. That disclaimer doesn't hide that.
Quan wasn’t warned because of what he believed, he was warned because he kept on posting a low end showing which is exactly what your doing. If the Mods want to warn quan for using a low end showing I fully support their actions because I don’t like using low showings like that. But the thing is that I don’t like ANYONE doing it, whether their name happens to be quanchi112 or not. And I wasn’t seeking equal punishment or anything like that either just some kind of equal standard being applied to the Surfer/BP incident and the Supes scan in question. And luckily for us we now know that there is such a standard in place…
Originally posted by Badabing
I handle each report on an individual basis based on past problems. I would say the same thing to people who continually posted low end Thanos feats. The Boneclaw incident comes to mind. Or the SS/BP armbar feat.