Originally posted by OneDumbG0
Given we have to choose between two options, characterizing those who choose the more probable option as "Marvel wanking fanboys" hardly seems fair.In fact, it's downright ignorant.
And considering Supeprime was arguing against the possibility that Surfer used his abilities to discern Gladiator's weakness, no he didn't. Not at all. He was presented with the same two options. He clearly believes the former to be true (that Surfer read some report or talked to someone about Gladiator's weakness, etc.) rather than the latter because he's opined the latter to not just be unprobable, but quite frankly from the below post, impossible😖hifting his position is a decision for him to make. It doesn't arise from you putting words into his mouth.
Agreed that surfer using CA to discover it is certainly more probable than the him overhearing it from someone or anything like that. That knowledge isnt just lying around and no such thing has ever been shwn on panel. The problem i had with it was the lack of enough prior evidence to indicate he actually does use it in similar manners.
However after a bit of digging i found a scan that should be useful in that regard. Surfer cosmic sense actually alert him to beings bio-signatures (here he identifies the Xmen using their bio-readings).
this is relevant because readings from a beings bio-signature reveal info about them such as, whats good for them,whats bad for them and in general the specific details about what positively or negatively affects their body.
Originally posted by AvlonThis is coming from the guy who suggested that Superman makes boom tubes with his speed, Superman was breaking a planet with his punches with his fight with Zod, and Superman was tanking constant entropic blasts, etc.
The "probability" only exists for those who want to see it. Like those who see Elvis in their waffles. The on panel does not show anything to actually prove the claim made about CA.
Oh the irony. dur
And that's still not the point considering that it is the probability that I'm concerned with since it is one of two viable explanations. The other explanation being less probable. Choosing the more probable option is not a characteristic of a "Marvel wanking fanboy."
Originally posted by OneDumbG0
And that's still not the point considering that it is the probability that I'm concerned with since it is one of two viable explanations. The other explanation being less probable. Choosing the more probable option is not a characteristic of a "Marvel wanking fanboy."
Since the rest of your post is utter gibberish, (characteristic of you as usual) I'll address the meat of it which is this part.
Let's try it again. It's not shown or stated on panel..and probability is not proof in place of something that's not part of Surfers power set in the first place.
Now shut up. (as you so delightfully like to bring up in debates. 🙂 )
^ Shut up about how people constantly bust your baseless, indeed, obviously incorrect, myths?
Or shut up about how I distinguished your busted myths from choosing between two explanations, one being more probable than the other?
Either way, I'll do neither when the best you can profer are immature insults concerning "Marvel wanking fanboys."
Silver Surfer 7/10.
Originally posted by OneDumbG0
^ Shut up about how people constantly bust your baseless, indeed, obviously incorrect, myths?Or shut up about how I distinguished your busted myths from choosing between two explanations, one being more probable than the other?
Either way, I'll do neither when the best you can profer are immature insults concerning "Marvel wanking fanboys."
Silver Surfer 7/10.
Baseless myth. Look at what you are supporting. 😉 Perhaps you want to bring up that Superman can't catch bullets again. Or GL's and black holes..or.. (this can go back and forth..but of course you want it that way to dissuade the original point.)
Or shut up about still choosing probability over on panel proof. Once again, if you are looking to see Elvis in your pancake syrup...you will find him. Otherwise, there isn't anything there.
Oh...and I never named you directly as one of the fanboys BUT if you chose to feel that...maybe there is a truth in it that you believe yourself. 😄
Originally posted by AvlonI'm supporting the more probable option between two options that isn't contradicted by anything. That's the distinction. That's different when you suggest that Superman breathes in hellfire, even though he breathes in pixie dust. That's different when you suggest Superman travels so fast he makes a boomtube even though he has a Motherbox. That's different when you suggest Superman and Zod cause collateral planet-busting damage, even though it's stated that it is their metaphysical connection to the place that causes the damage. Etc etc etc.
Baseless myth. Look at what you are supporting. 😉 Perhaps you want to bring up that Superman can't catch bullets again. Or GL's and black holes..or.. (this can go back and forth..but of course you want it that way to dissuade the original point.)
Originally posted by AvlonI think a more likely explanation is that you just threw out an insult out of spite and are resorting to transplanting perceived motivations when you have nothig substantive else to add.
Or shut up about still choosing probability over on panel proof. Once again, if you are looking to see Elvis in your pancake syrup...you will find him. Otherwise, there isn't anything there.Oh...and I never named you directly as one of the fanboys BUT if you chose to feel that...maybe there is a truth in it that you believe yourself. 😄
Superman 6/10, for me the fight will be a close one but i have to consider supes superior speed and fighting apititude. He is virtually invulnerable agaisnt many of his exploitations these days, and while SS does have amazing speed while on his board to blast him with multiple blast it isn't anything supes hasn't handled before. It's a damn good fight though, but the overall speed and physical advantage are to much to overlook.
Originally posted by Super DragonLulz. Sock.
Superman 6/10, for me the fight will be a close one but i have to consider supes superior speed and fighting apititude. He is virtually invulnerable agaisnt many of his exploitations these days, and while SS does have amazing speed while on his board to blast him with multiple blast it isn't anything supes hasn't handled before. It's a damn good fight though, but the overall speed and physical advantage are to much to overlook.
Originally posted by Super DragonHey Galen
Superman 6/10, for me the fight will be a close one but i have to consider supes superior speed and fighting apititude. He is virtually invulnerable agaisnt many of his exploitations these days, and while SS does have amazing speed while on his board to blast him with multiple blast it isn't anything supes hasn't handled before. It's a damn good fight though, but the overall speed and physical advantage are to much to overlook.
Originally posted by OneDumbG0
I think a more likely explanation is that you just threw out an insult out of spite and are resorting to transplanting perceived motivations when you have nothig substantive else to add.
Better yet..again you are going around the original statement and babbling on about nonsense when it's still crystal clear what was said in my original post.
Btw. If you took my post about Marvel fanboys personal (which it seems that you did) just LOL @ you.. but just in case you missed it..again.
Probability still doesn't make it true.
Especially when the probability comes from Marvel wanking fanboys.
As a matter of fact, going into probability means that Supeprime made his point.
Originally posted by OneDumbG0
Given we have to choose between two options, characterizing those who choose the more probable option as "Marvel wanking fanboys" hardly seems fair.In fact, it's downright ignorant.
And considering Supeprime was arguing against the possibility that Surfer used his abilities to discern Gladiator's weakness, no he didn't. Not at all. He was presented with the same two options. He clearly believes the former to be true (that Surfer read some report or talked to someone about Gladiator's weakness, etc.) rather than the latter because he's opined the latter to not just be unprobable, but quite frankly from the below post, impossible😖hifting his position is a decision for him to make. It doesn't arise from you putting words into his mouth.
What an oafish arguement. There was nothing in that panel that suggested his cosmic senses were at play there at all. There was no reference to him scanning or reading Glads at ALL. The fact that you would make the leap of logic that he can discern anyone's weakness via that one instance is comical. Therefore you are either A) Making fanboyish assumptions that no one else with a smidgen of common sense would make or B) You have created an account here to provide comic relief in the form of clumsy arguements, dressed up in proper wording and grammar.
I choose to believe the latter. From this point forth, I will address you as a "comedian" until you have otherwise proven yourself not to be one.
Kisses,
Supeprime.
