Racism

Started by Creshosk215 pages
Originally posted by PITT_HAPPENS
If you take one aspect of the race yes I would agree with you that you would consider yourself a “racist”, but they way I see it applying is stating that one race overall is superior to another. As for insulting someone it can be implied that they are superior or not but doesn’t have to be, as I see it when one says that one race is superior they refer to the whole race such as saying “Whites are smarter than blacks”, to me that is a racist statement than saying “Most whites are smarter than blacks”.

What about "Blacks are racially superior to whites because whites are hatemongerers?"

Originally posted by KidRock
It doesnt matter what your definition of racism is..

Tell him that. He's was the one complaining about how I didn't tell him what "my" definition of racism is.

Originally posted by FistOfThe North
Tell him that. He's was the one complaining about how I didn't tell him what "my" definition of racism is.
You are racist, you realize that right?

Originally posted by FistOfThe North
Tell him that. He's was the one complaining about how I didn't tell him what "my" definition of racism is.

But you're the one saying you're not racist because your definition of it doesn't make you one.

Going by the actually definition of racism, you're a racist because you class an entire group of people into one stereotype.

Originally posted by Creshosk
You are racist, you realize that right?

Wrong again..

Originally posted by KidRock
But you're the one saying you're not racist because your definition of it doesn't make you one.

Going by the actually definition of racism, you're a racist because you class an entire group of people into one stereotype.

Are you telling me that racism is not the (self or group) practice of racial superiority? If you think so you've never been more wrong.

And isn't classifying an entire group of people into a category stereotyping?, and not racism? Which, of course, mean totally different things..

Originally posted by FistOfThe North
Are you telling me that racism is not the (self or group) practice of racial superiority? If you think so you've never been more wrong.

I guess I will have to post it for you...AGAIN(i suspect I will have to repeat this for you 3 or 4 more times).

Prejudice or discrimination based on an individual's race. It can be expressed individually or through institutional policies or practices.
www.culturalpartnerships.org/productspubs/glossary.asp

You're discriminating againes whites saying they are all genetically racist..and this changes your perception of them to make you not like them...thus, by definition, making you a racist.

Racial superiority is not the only factor in racism.

RACIAL SUPERIORITY IS NOT THE ONLY FACTOR OF RACISM.

Originally posted by FistOfThe North
Wrong again..
Oh that was a brilliant argument you sure showed me..

that you're an idiot.

Either way we can, and have, proved that FotN is racist and a bigot.

We have basically just been repeating ourselves for the past 50 pages since he doesn't want to accept the fact.

He will never admit he is a racist, but he is, and its up to him to come to terms with that and accept and deal with it.

Originally posted by Creshosk
Oh that was a brilliant argument you sure showed me..

Listen creshcock, or however the hell you pronouce it..stick to the topic and less to showing how unclever you are.

lol, kids.

that you're an idiot.

Oh yes each time you're backed into a corner you want to get back on topic of how whites are racist. durwank

Originally posted by Creshosk
Oh yes each time you're backed into a corner you want to get back on topic of how whites are racist. durwank

Backed, corner, lol. Please..

Hey, I've never known of you. And I don't remember anything you, and quite a few others, but especially you, saying anything of import. It's mostly rants with you. Which is why I don't put effort in with you.

It seems like you cheer leading a debate contest for it's sake or you wanna win one or...i dunno. I just get the feeling you're on here just for fun.

Originally posted by FistOfThe North
Backed, corner, lol. Please..

Hey, I've never known of you. And I don't remember anything you, and quite a few others, but especially you, saying anything of import. It's mostly rants with you. Which is why I don't put effort in with you.

It seems like you cheer leading a debate contest for it's sake or you wanna win one or...i dunno. I just get the feeling you're on here just for fun.

Its funny how I always get that when debating against someone, and then when I'm on their side I'm always invaluable.

I think you're just saying that cause you can't debate the things I say so cop-out with a supressed evidence fallacy. doped

Originally posted by inimalist
does the truth of the statement affect that classification?

(not that I have a whole lot of empirical data to support it)

If you had evidence to support the claim then it wouldn’t be stereotyping however if the evidence was slanted to skew the results then yes. The main classification (not the only one) that I use is the difference between all and some and not having evidence to support your claim.
Originally posted by KidRock
DEFENITION OF RACISM: [B]or racialism is a form of discrimination based on race,

You classify all whites as being genetically racist..as stated in your posts, would you like me to post it again?

You discriminate against whites and believe they are all racist.

If a man is caught murdering someone, he is a murderer, regardless of what he says.

You're a racist weather you except it or not..you saying that you're not just proves you're a delusional racist, but a racist none the less.

Well when he sees you destroying everything hes done I am sure he will make an exception. [/B]

That is only one of the definitions of racism, many others have the term “superior” and this is why I asked him his.
Originally posted by FistOfThe North
lol, I'm amazing at how you managed that in 2 sentences.

But anyway my definition of racism is the practice of racial superiority over any other race.

Being prejudice is judging without knowledge, if i'm correct. And a bigot is a person whom has a strong partial preference and is intolerant of anything different.

How am I misdefining anything.

And racism has gotten worse over the years. We still have A.A. which should be unnecessary by now but it isn't. It's very necessary. Those programs and the likes would've been ok during the civil rights era but why are they there now and in more need than ever? Cause of American racism. Some institutions (and people) just don't wanna let go of the idea of segregation in this country, and yes, it's gotten worse.

Again, if you classify the superiority of one race over the other as you have said then no it has not gotten worse, in order for that to happen we would have to take away all of your rights such as voting, owning property, allowing blacks to freely travel and so on.

As for your organizations that need to be there are not only to protect the rights or black but all races including whites for them not to would be prejudice as well. They are there to protect the rights of all races and have done so on many occasions. They were more needed in the civil rights era than they are now, why because there were no civil rights for minorities.

Considering that 80% of the population of the United States is considered “white” how could your statement of most whites are racist be valid and civil rights for minorities have ever passed?

Originally posted by PITT_HAPPENS
That is only one of the definitions of racism, many others have the term “superior” and this is why I asked him his.
But if there's one definition that fits then its correct usage.

Like nuts can refer to either a legume or a metal component used for holding something together.

Going off of several dictionary definitions he's racist. Plain and simple.

Originally posted by Creshosk
Its funny how I always get that when debating against someone, and then when I'm on their side I'm always invaluable.

I think you're just saying that cause you can't debate the things I say so cop-out with a supressed evidence fallacy. doped

haha, on the contrary, i'd ask you what you're doing and pleasantly telling you to fcuk off in one sentence. You're mosquito annoying.

But think all you want. You should definitely think about rewriting that second sentence, too.

Originally posted by Creshosk
But if there's one definition that fits then its correct usage.

Like nuts can refer to either a legume or a metal component used for holding something together.

Going off of several dictionary definitions he's racist. Plain and simple.

Agreed, I was more referring to the one example that Kid Rock posted. I view it as if we keep using it as we have it will loose its impact that I feel that it was intended for. In general calling some one racist compared to prejudice is a stronger term and that is why I think people like to use it so much for the impact and shock value.

Originally posted by FistOfThe North
haha, on the contrary, i'd ask you what you're doing and pleasantly telling you to fcuk off in one sentence. You're mosquito annoying.

But think all you want. You should definitely think about rewriting that second sentence, too.

Oikay, you're a moron who couldn't debate his way out of a paper bag. and you're someone with either selctive memory or one who simply likes to discard what they can't handle. You can't handle the fact that your'e racist, so you discard it. You don't like the definition of racism so you discard that. You don't like the fact that you're racist so you discard those observations. You don't like that you can't handle my arguments so par to the course you simply discard those.

Denying something doesn't change it or make it go away. Its a supressed Evidence fallacy of ignoring evidence that was brought before you.

You don't like it? Tough snicker-doodles. Simply not liking something won't change it.

You totally had me at snicker doodles.

Originally posted by Creshosk
Oikay, you're a moron who couldn't debate his way out of a paper bag. and you're someone with either selctive memory or one who simply likes to discard what they can't handle. You can't handle the fact that your'e racist, so you discard it. You don't like the definition of racism so you discard that. You don't like the fact that you're racist so you discard those observations. You don't like that you can't handle my arguments so par to the course you simply discard those.

Denying something doesn't change it or make it go away. Its a supressed Evidence fallacy of ignoring evidence that was brought before you.

You don't like it? Tough snicker-doodles. Simply not liking something won't change it.

Ah. There you are. All fattened up with substance too.

Plain and simple, I'm not a racist. I don't hate White people cause they're White. And what arguments? Until now all I've been hearing from you were the annoying and slight mosquito buzzes. That's why I don't you serious, kid. And denial and suppression is something that won't make the racism in Whiteness go away.