Originally posted by dadudemon
boy....you really got him....So I guess that means that you are in your mom's basement right now with no plans for the weekend?
I don't mind you busting my balls; I am seriously curious as to why you do bust my balls though? Lately, whenever I 'zing' an idiot for acting like an idiot, you have something to add towards me. Why is that?
Originally posted by inimalist
Blah, I don't know how much to write, since I'm not sure how much you are interested in my personal sexual philosophy.
at least it shows that you've applied a little critical thinking. I, however, do not agree that a subconscious choice is made out of social obligation.
Originally posted by Devil King
at least it shows that you've applied a little critical thinking. I, however, do not agree that a subconscious choice is made out of social obligation.
I agree with you actually. My thoughts are not that sexuality is a choice, but that the definition of sexuality as being an "either/or" type proposition is misleading and may, for instance, cause men who are not normally attracted to men to completely ignore said attraction. My thought is that people are by nature "bi-sexual" to some degree, though I would even say that term is misleading.
Originally posted by inimalist
lolfirst off, i messed up the wording. Dualistic should be "bi-polar", which im sure explains everything 😉
A bi-polar system is one where things can either be on or off. Binary code is bi-polar, somethins is either a 1 or a 0. The even more technical term, I believe, is "Boolean". So, with regards to the topic, I am saying that even conceptualizing sexuality as a 0/1 type system, where people are either this or that, may affect the way that people develop sexually. Basically, as we grow up, we feel that it is important to fall into one of the two categories, and thus, we do.
The second part refers to the idea, which as far as I know was first put forward by Kinsey, that sexuality, with regards to hetero or homosexuality, is a continuum. This means that there are infinite places along an axis, with 100% hetero at one end and 100% homo at the other, where people can fall. A conceptualization of sexuality in this way might influence people to not have such a static preconcieved notion of what their sexuality is; this ambiguity being determined by their culture.
Of course this is entirely suppositional. I have seen no evidence at all that would really support my thoughts. The existance of "bi-sexuality" somewhat affects my criticism of modern society as "boolean" with regard to sexuality. I am also supposing that people are naturally not either homo or hetero. Blah, I don't know how much to write, since I'm not sure how much you are interested in my personal sexual philosophy.
Haha, my biggest problem with this whole conversation is that, were you to ask me about my sexuality, there are many more important characteristics I could give you rather than whether I want my partner to have a penis or a vagina. That seems like such an irrelevant distinction, although it is the most important consideration when determining your own sexuality...
What about furthering the species? Don't you think that we are inherently programmed to be attracted to the opposite sex with just a few exceptions? (i.e. homosexuals)
Which brings me to another point....people hate things that are not normal. What happens when a significant portion of humans become homosexual?...eventually, most people will not be so stupid about homosexuals.
Originally posted by dadudemonConsidering that only a small percentage of the population is homosexual (comparatively speaking), I'd say that is a safe bet.
What about furthering the species? Don't you think that we are inherently programmed to be attracted to the opposite sex with just a few exceptions? (i.e. homosexuals)Which brings me to another point....people hate things that are not normal. What happens when a significant portion of humans become homosexual?...eventually, most people will not be so stupid about homosexuals.
Not sure more people will "become" homosexual.
Originally posted by Robtard
I don't mind you busting my balls; I am seriously curious as to why you do bust my balls though? Lately, whenever I 'zing' an idiot for acting like an idiot, you have something to add towards me. Why is that?
Because you "zing back" with the best of them. Makes me laugh when I pwn you and it makes me laugh harder when you make me look like an idiot...I wouldn't do it with someone who was a newb...it would make me feel bad.
Soooo...uhh....watcha doin' this weekend? Gonna bate in the basement again?
Originally posted by dadudemon
Because you "zing back" with the best of them. Makes me laugh when I pwn you and it makes me laugh harder when you make me look like an idiot...I wouldn't do it with someone who was a newb...it would make me feel bad.Soooo...uhh....watcha doin' this weekend? Gonna bate in the basement again?
Nope, unfortunately neither my mother or I have a basement.
Originally posted by dadudemon
okay...okay.....more people are born that are or become homosexual...better?
Again, I don't think more homosxuals are being born (or become for that matter). I think more homosexuals are 'coming out', because it is more acceptable to be gay now, than it was 20-30-40+ years ago.
Originally posted by Robtard
Insults like that are "over the line!"
My bad...I didn't mean to call you, you.
So yeah....more people will start "coming out" as more and more people start to admit homosexuality. This may turn into a domino effect where in 100-200 years, we will not reproduce and half of all humans are homosexual.........right? (Artificial reproduction.)
Originally posted by dadudemon
My bad...I didn't mean to call you, you.So yeah....more people will start "coming out" as more and more people start to admit homosexuality. This may turn into a domino effect where in 100-200 years, we will not reproduce and half of all humans are homosexual.........right? (Artificial reproduction.)
I would think twice before you go with the "Bardock42 & Robtard are the same person/socking" angle... you'll make you're out to be an even bigger idiot. Just some advice.
Domino affect? Do you honestly think straight people turn gay? Eg, there's straight people just waiting to turn gay and marry the same sex, if/when gay marriages become accepted?
Originally posted by dadudemon
My bad...I didn't mean to call you, you.So yeah....more people will start "coming out" as more and more people start to admit homosexuality. This may turn into a domino effect where in 100-200 years, we will not reproduce and half of all humans are homosexual.........right? (Artificial reproduction.)
I don't think that's going to happen.
Originally posted by Robtard
I would think twice before you go with the "Bardock42 & Robtard are the same person/socking" angle... you'll make you're out to be an even bigger idiot. Just some advice.Domino affect? Do you honestly think straight people turn gay?
I can't help it if you are confusing my stupid little mind so much that it is hard to tell you apart from Bardock42. 😕
Domino effect....as in more and more people stop suppressing their homosexuality because they are no longer afraid of society...that's what I mean, bardo.....I mean... Robtard.
Originally posted by dadudemon
I can't help it if you are confusing my stupid little mind so much that it is hard to tell you apart from Bardock42. 😕Domino effect....as in more and more people stop suppressing their homosexuality because they are no longer afraid of society...that's what I mean, bardo.....I mean... Robtard.
Okay, be the idiot if you like.
What does that have to do with affecting birth rates? People in the closet are still gay and homosexuals can still reproduce. I find it immensely improbable that he majority of people are homosexual and just having babies because they're scared to come out.
If anything, if will be similar to certain aprts of San Francisco, were for the most part, gays can openly be gay. I don't think kids will be choosing gay or straight as both acceptable/equal options.
Originally posted by Robtard
What does that have to do with affecting birth rates? People in the closet are still gay and homosexuals can still reproduce. I find it immensely improbably that he majority of people are homosexual and just having babies because they're scared to come out.If anything, if will be similar to certain aprts of San Francisco, were for the most part, gays can openly be gay. I don't think kids will be choosing gay or straight as both acceptable/equal options.
I didn't mention birth rates....I alluded to the fact that people will not have babies in the future....they will be made in the microwave along side your popcorn bag. JEEZ!!! (Though I am being a smart ass...you should get my point.)
arpts???..."arp" resolves IP addresses to NetBIOS names...so what is arpts??? (Note the elegant Bardock42ishness that the dadudemon is emulating.)
Some gays are annoying to me because some people are attention whores...*cough* chris crocker *cough*....on the whole, I think homosexuals are an essential element of modern culture...
Originally posted by dadudemon
I didn't mention birth rates....I alluded to the fact that people will not have babies in the future....they will be made in the microwave along side your popcorn bag. JEEZ!!! (Though I am being a smart ass...you should get my point.)arpts???..."arp" resolves IP addresses to NetBIOS names...so what is arpts??? (Note the elegant Bardock42ishness that the dadudemon is emulating.)
Some gays are annoying to me because some people are attention whores...*cough* chris crocker *cough*....on the whole, I think homosexuals are an essential element of modern culture...
So what "domino affect of homosexuality" were you referring to then... stop dancing. Also, how is it a "fact" that people will not reproduce in the future?
What annoys you, the "gay" aspect or the "attention whore" aspect, because attention whoring isn't sexual orientation specific. Modern culture only? Gays have been around since man has been around, logically thinking, I think homosexuality is just a part of it all.