Originally posted by Robtard
So what "domino affect of homosexuality" were you referring to then... stop dancing. Also, how is it a "fact" that people will not reproduce in the future?What annoys you, the "gay" aspect or the "attention whore" aspect, because attention whoring isn't sexual orientation specific. Modern culture only? Gays have been around since man has been around, logically thinking, I think homosexuality is just a part of it all.
I am not dancing around it...you are just an idiot. 😐
I have been to the future and back...obviously. 🙄
The average human will not reproduce...babies will be grown. The poor will have no choice but to cling to the antiquated rituals of copulation with the intent of offspring. 🙄
Attention whores...specifically. Not gays being attention whores...NFL Football players are annoying doing it, actors and actresses are annoying doing it, regular everyday people are annoying doing it. How ever, the "gay man attention whore" persona seems to be the persona that several gay men THINK they have to be, which is annoying, depending on how it is done. As long as they are not jerks and asinine about it, I love it and they are good company when the shit hits the fan.
This is my personal experience and now amount of "super logics" will change those experiences.
Originally posted by Devil King
How so?
I will answer your question with another question. How do you THINK homosexuality is essential to modern society?
Anyone can answer that, BTW. Any answer you receive, Devil King, will be the answer I intended.
Since hundreds of people do not scour over these forums each day, I don't think my point will be made quite as clear as I would like.
Originally posted by dadudemon
I am not dancing around it...you are just an idiot. 😐I have been to the future and back...obviously. 🙄
The average human will not reproduce...babies will be grown. The poor will have no choice but to cling to the antiquated rituals of copulation with the intent of offspring. 🙄
Attention whores...specifically. Not gays being attention whores...NFL Football players are annoying doing it, actors and actresses are annoying doing it, regular everyday people are annoying doing it. How ever, the "gay man attention whore" persona seems to be the persona that several gay men THINK they have to be, which is annoying, depending on how it is done. As long as they are not jerks and asinine about it, I love it and they are good company when the shit hits the fan.
This is my personal experience and now amount of "super logics" will change those experiences.
I will answer your question with another question. How do you THINK homosexuality is essential to modern society?
Anyone can answer that, BTW. Any answer you receive, Devil King, will be the answer I intended.
Since hundreds of people do not scour over these forums each day, I don't think my point will be made quite as clear as I would like.
Idiotic...
...and even more idiotic. You make a statement, he asks a question about it; you ask him to answer it.
Originally posted by Robtard
Idiotic......and even more idiotic. You make a statement, he asks a question about it; you ask him to answer it.
And even more idiotic than that...you call something idiotic without refuting why it is idiotic...hmm....you must've been in the basement too long when you made that post.
Originally posted by dadudemon
And even more idiotic than that...you call something idiotic without refuting why it is idiotic...hmm....you must've been in the basement too long when you made that post.
It speaks for itself... you make claims, when questioned of said claims, you dance and make further asinine claims, repeat/regurgitate. Oh, I did refute why it's idiotic, can't you read, I spelled it out clearly what you did with DK.
Originally posted by Robtard
It speaks for itself... you make claims, when questioned of said claims, you dance and make further asinine claims, repeat/regurgitate. Oh, I did refute why it's idiotic, can't you read, I spelled it out clearly what you did with DK.
You'd think that with all that time in the basement that you would have more time to actually make a legit refute.
*sigh* oh well...stick with the "OMG liek yur and idi0t, d00d" and claim I am too stupid to see you pwned me.
On a side note....you got any hot pockets down there?
Originally posted by dadudemon
You'd think that with all that time in the basement that you would have more time to actually make a legit refute.*sigh* oh well...stick with the "OMG liek yur and idi0t, d00d" and claim I am too stupid to see you pwned me.
On a side note....you got any hot pockets down there?
Funny, I'm not the one who says "pwned", shit like ""OMG liek yur and idi0t, d00d", or makes any such claims, Michael Flatley.
Edit: I see you're pulling the same exact crap with Bardock in the 'Mex-Lawn' thread, "insufferable", is correct, he pegged you dead to rights.
Originally posted by dadudemon
How do you THINK homosexuality is essential to modern society?Anyone can answer that, BTW. Any answer you receive, Devil King, will be the answer I intended.
I think homosexuality is essential to modern society, because there are homosexuals. At least social tolerance/acceptance is essential to homosexuals. It's a matter of fact for society; it's a reality for homosexuals; and the interaction of the two is essential for expanding tolerance/acceptance of differences for both American society and understanding of other cultures.
But the existence of homosexuals, or the lack of human homosexuals, wouldn't bring down human culture.
But why do you want me to answer the question for you?
Originally posted by Devil King
I think homosexuality is essential to modern society, because there are homosexuals. At least social tolerance/acceptance is essential to homosexuals. It's a matter of fact for society; it's a reality for homosexuals; and the interaction of the two is essential for expanding tolerance/acceptance of differences for both American society and understanding of other cultures.But the existence of homosexuals, or the lack of human homosexuals, wouldn't bring down human culture.
But why do you want me to answer the question for you?
I was trying to indicate that everyone may have a different reason and any reason is a good reason because it is a reason to the individual and individuality is one of the key points of homosexuality...that we are all individuals and should have the right to express ourselves the way we want to.
Originally posted by Robtard
So why do you think they're "essential"?
Because it is another form of diversification and acceptance of diversification and acceptance OF that diversification is another way humans can better themselves i.e. less violence and persecution of others....HENCE it being essential for modern culture (In my book.) You could say that I am a hippie in a way because I like it when people love each other...
however, that was not the point that I really intended to make...my REAL point was already made. (sort of.)
I love you Robtard...babies?
Originally posted by dadudemon
I was trying to indicate that everyone may have a different reason and any reason is a good reason because it is a reason to the individual and individuality is one of the key points of homosexuality...that we are all individuals and should have the right to express ourselves the way we want to.
Individuality?
Is that a nice way of saying all homosexuals are attention whores?
Originally posted by dadudemon
Because it is another form of diversification and acceptance of diversification and acceptance OF that diversification is another way humans can better themselves i.e. less violence and persecution of others....HENCE it being essential for modern culture (In my book.) You could say that I am a hippie in a way because I like it when people love each other...however, that was not the point that I really intended to make...my REAL point was already made. (sort of.)
I love you Robtard...babies?
That doesn't explain the "essential" aspect of it, now does it. You're just saying "it's good to have diversity", that has nothing to do with it being essential, i.e. 'of the utmost importance.' If homosexuality didn't exist, would we be worse off or even doomed somehow, the answer to that may explain your "essential" claim.
By your own admission, you're not good looking, sorry; I want good looking babies.
Originally posted by Devil King
Individuality?Is that a nice way of saying all homosexuals are attention whores?
Nope, you are looking too far into things...why are you trying to victimize yourself?..ATTENTION WHORE!!! 😠
Originally posted by Robtard
That doesn't explain the "essential" aspect of it, now does it. You're just saying "it's good to have diversity", that has nothing to do with it being essential, i.e. 'of the utmost importance.' If homosexuality didn't exist, would we be worse off or even doomed somehow, the answer to that may explain your "essential" claim.By your own admission, you're not good looking, sorry; I want good looking babies.
Your definition of essential, in this context, differs from my definition of essential. I feel that homosexuality is one of the things that IS essential for the progression of the human race. Can we survive without it? Yes...we could probably survive even better without homosexuality.
Do you not get my point or are you just wanting to argue about something that I will never concede?
I have always believed that developing a more tolerant society and a more understanding society was ESSENTIAL for humanity to progress. Do you think that we will progress faster if humans continue to hold their prejudices and discriminations.
Looking back, survival wasn't the best choice of words...however, your being an ass for nitpicking at it.
Also, I have never seen a picture of you...how could I ever know what our babies would look like?
Originally posted by dadudemon
Your definition of essential, in this context, differs from my definition of essential. I feel that homosexuality is one of the things that IS essential for the progression of the human race. Can we survive without it? Yes...we could probably survive even better without homosexuality.Do you not get my point or are you just wanting to argue about something that I will never concede?
I have always believed that developing a more tolerant society and a more understanding society was ESSENTIAL for humanity to progress. Do you think that we will progress faster if humans continue to hold their prejudices and discriminations.
Looking back, survival wasn't the best choice of words...however, your being an ass for nitpicking at it.
Also, I have never seen a picture of you...how could I ever know what our babies would look like?
My bad, I was using the definition dictated by the English language, if you're making up your own definition to the word, then okay, it (or any word) can fit your purposes. It's an odd practice though.
Do you get my point, I'm not trying to make you "concede" to anything. You made a statement, I asked questions about it.
Originally posted by Robtard
My bad, I was using the definition dictated by the English language, if you're making up your own definition to the word, then okay, it (or any word) can fit your purposes. It's an odd practice though.Do you get my point, I'm not trying to make you "concede" to anything. You made a statement, I asked questions about it.
Sorry...nope, there is a text book definition and then the context in which that definition is used. I am accurate in stating the following:
Toleration and acceptance are essential to the development of a civil society.
Since I cannot go back and edit my post, I want to replace "survival" with progression....which is NOT the same. That is what I meant and since I type in a hurry, I do not always express my meanings/thoughts perfectly.
Originally posted by dadudemon
Sorry...nope, there is a text book definition and then the context in which that definition is used. I am accurate in stating the following:Toleration and acceptance are essential to the development of a civil society.
Since I cannot go back and edit my post, I want to replace "survival" with progression....which is NOT the same. That is what I meant and since I type in a hurry, I do not always express my meanings/thoughts perfectly.
"I think homosexuals are an essential element of modern culture..."
That's what you stated, your claims of "it's good to have diversity/be accepting" do not substantiate "essential", in either "text book" or "context" definitions.
Just stick with your definition of the word, then it can work any which way you want.
Originally posted by Robtard
"I think homosexuals are an essential element of modern culture..."That's what you stated, your claims of "it's good to have diversity/be accepting" do not substantiate "essential", in either "text book" or "context" definitions.
Just stick with your definition of the word, then it can work any which way you want.
Oh that's what I said? Then by all means that sounds great!!! How is it that hard to understand that it really IS essential to modern culture? (BTW, I should go back and read my posts before I decide that I didn't post things right. I should stop being so trusting to things people say that I posted.)
I think you should leave the definition and use of words up to other people who have a better handle on the English language.
here you go:
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/essential