Originally posted by Hazsekswthurmom
Well I think it doesn't take much to replicate a feat such as that. And there's no telling what extent Ss can amp himself to.
So he's not exactly a weakling in his full strength.
Originally posted by quanchi112And when that person used those examples to debunk Superman defeats, you countered it with some weak excuse. It's hypocrisy is what I call it. So what if Thanos can hold his own against powerful skyfathers and such. If he used more than his physical strength, then the example....is irrelevent.
I criticized someone for using abc logic when comparing Superman and Darkseid against another opponent. Why do that when they have fought each ohter. here we have to becuz they have never met and faced off.
Originally posted by HazsekswthurmomNo heres the difference. With regards to that debate he wanted to show me how powerful Superman can be but just write off his losses to Superman as pis. Cant have it both ways. If superman beats other powerful beings why arent they written off as pis as well. Didnt add up then and doesnt add up now.
And when that person used those examples to debunk Superman defeats, you countered it with some weak excuse. It's hypocrisy is what I call it. So what if Thanos can hold his own against powerful skyfathers and such. If he used more than his physical strength, then the example....is irrelevent.
Originally posted by Bransolute
The funny thing is... Runner ran in straight lines right at Thanos...
And he also got the element of surprise; something Surfer doesn't have in this fight.Plus, again, Thanos still reacted to FO trying to blitz. And since it was a straight flight travel feat, he was faster than if he tried to cheapshot him, since he doesn't have to zag, and such. The result would have been the same... Fallen One getting squished against the shield, since the shield surrounds Thanos entirely. 🙂
So it's hardly relevant which direction he took.
In the end... Thanos still reacted to it. 🙂
Except there is no word on how fast FO was going...
Runner was said to be moving fast...but he was also taunting Thanos...which gave him time to use his infinity gem to defeat him.
Starfox was playing it smart with the touch and go...and did far better than SS ever did against the titan.
Originally posted by Bransolute
TThanos was turned into a bunch of different things there as well... if you hadn't noticed.The funny thing is:
And Warlock killed Thanos in his past incarnation... so...🙂
---
I got a headache from trying to argue this, so I'll be back tomorrow.
He went through differing realities in his chair. Not exactly the same as matter manip...however...when Warlock used actual matter manip..it worked just fine on Thanos. His upgrades never stated that it made him immune to something he was weak to.
Originally posted by AvlonWhy then did no one ever do that to Thanos again. Also it was warlocks ghost.
Except there is no word on how fast FO was going...
Runner was said to be moving fast...but he was also taunting Thanos...which gave him time to use his infinity gem to defeat him.
Starfox was playing it smart with the touch and go...and did far better than SS ever did against the titan.He went through differing realities in his chair. Not exactly the same as matter manip...however...when Warlock used actual matter manip..it worked just fine on Thanos. His upgrades never stated that it made him immune to something he was weak to.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Yes Thanos tech. Cyborg was just plain kicking the shit out of Superman one on one. It was embarassing while you had Thanos hold his own against a more powerful opponent than Cyborg.
Except once again that Thor got pwned by tech...the very thing Borg could easily reproduce.
Borg>Thor.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Why then did no one ever do that to Thanos again. Also it was warlocks ghost.
Because killing Thanos over and over again wouldn't be fun?...
Originally posted by quanchi112Well if that example was true, then that would mean Supes has shot at taking Thanos, even when he has access to his full powerset. Wouldn't Quan? The point of that example was to show why Ds losing to Superman, doesn't make Seid a mere herald leveler.
No heres the difference. With regards to that debate he wanted to show me how powerful Superman can be but just write off his losses to Superman as pis. Cant have it both ways. If superman beats other powerful beings why arent they written off as pis as well. Didnt add up then and doesnt add up now.
Originally posted by AvlonLeave the tech out of it for a moment. Thor with the power gem was a monster who would wreck Cyborg physically with his rings. Thanos hung with Thor while Superman couldnt hang with Cyborg physically. That to me is the difference.
Except once again that Thor got pwned by tech...the very thing Borg could easily reproduce.Borg>Thor.
Originally posted by HazsekswthurmomNo it wouldnt. Darkseid lacks the physical toughness and the overall durbility than Thanos has. Thats the reason he lost. Not as durable and not as tough.
Well if that example was true, then that would mean Supes has shot at taking Thanos, even when he has access to his full powerset. Wouldn't Quan? The point of that example was to show why Ds losing to Superman, doesn't make Seid a mere herald leveler.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Leave the tech out of it for a moment. Thor with the power gem was a monster who would wreck Cyborg physically with his rings. Thanos hung with Thor while Superman couldnt hang with Cyborg physically. That to me is the difference.
So leave tech out because that is what pwned Thor and it's the very essence of Borg?
That Superman coudln't hang with Borg physically is like saying that Thor couldn't hand with Thor with PG physically.
Thanos needed tech for the win.
Originally posted by AvlonYes he needed tech for the win. But take a look out how much longer he lasted than Superman did in his encounter. Superman was pulverized in a much shorter fight. Superman needed help and without it he would have died. Without tech Thanos would have lost. To me Thanos fought a tougher opponent and needed no outside help to survive.
So leave tech out because that is what pwned Thor and it's the very essence of Borg?That Superman coudln't hang with Borg physically is like saying that Thor couldn't hand with Thor with PG physically.
Thanos needed tech for the win.
Originally posted by quanchi112Ds barely loses to Superman on their encounters and you have yet to show that Supes<Thanos in terms of strength. Hell we never seen Thanos take a galaxy busting attack, so we can't say his durability is greater either. Abc logic is your only defense in this argument.
No it wouldnt. Darkseid lacks the physical toughness and the overall durbility than Thanos has. Thats the reason he lost. Not as durable and not as tough.
Originally posted by HazsekswthurmomBarely loses. Did you read apokolips now. I mean Darkseid begged for his stinking life. Wasnt close at all. When superman avoided the oe it was all over from there. Physically Darkseid cant hang with Superman imo.
Ds barely loses to Superman on their encounters and you have yet to show that Supes<Thanos in terms of strength. Hell we never seen Thanos take a galaxy busting attack, so we can't say his durability is greater either. Abc logic is your only defense in this argument.