Superman vs. Wonder Woman

Started by abhilegend155 pages

Originally posted by -Pr-
Even if you can prove Rucka said that, the comic still makes it iffy.

And yes, while I wish real science always applied in comics, it doesn't.

I didn't realise you were the new rule-maker. Please, have a seat.

Can you prove Rucka said it?


What? You think I made up an 8 years old thread or the original poster just randomly posted those words and everybody believed him? One of the biggest WW fanboys I've seen J accepted that in the next reply.

And isn't the writer's word the final on these things? You know what else I found? Matt Wagner's trinity IS canon.

"'This is set in continuity,' Wagner said."

"'I'm thoroughly surprised and delighted that this story hasn't already been told in DC's continuity,' Wagner said."

http://comicboards.com/php/show.php?rpy=comicbattles-2005110918072700&search=wagner&layout=thread

w00tw00t

Originally posted by abhilegend
What? You think I made up an 8 years old thread or the original poster just randomly posted those words and everybody believed him? One of the biggest WW fanboys I've seen J accepted that in the next reply.

And isn't the writer's word the final on these things? You know what else I found? Matt Wagner's trinity IS canon.

http://comicboards.com/php/show.php?rpy=comicbattles-2005110918072700&search=wagner&layout=thread

w00tw00t

Don't dodge the question: Can you prove it's Rucka or not? That's all I asked.

Yeah, we talked about Wagner's Trinity before. It was later said to be not in continuity. Don't start pulling the "forgetful Carver" act. It won't go well.

Originally posted by -Pr-
Don't dodge the question: Can you prove it's Rucka or not? That's all I asked.

Yeah, we talked about Wagner's Trinity before. It was later said to be not in continuity. Don't start pulling the "forgetful Carver" act. It won't go well.

So what? It was canon according to the author then DC decided it was non-canon later on?

Originally posted by abhilegend
He said that was an artist error. Ultimately writer's word>art in the comic.
Link me to an official interview. If you can't prove that was the writer then we go with on panel depictions.

Sometimes I hate being a Superman fan.

Me too...

Originally posted by SquallX
Sometimes I hate being a Superman fan.
Originally posted by riv6672
Me too...

Neither of you are welcome in the House Of El and shall be dealt with, "discretely." huhu

Originally posted by SquallX
Sometimes I hate being a Superman fan.

Me too.

Originally posted by carver9
Me too.

El oh phucking el

Originally posted by SquallX
Sometimes I hate being a Superman fan.
Originally posted by riv6672
Me too...

Me t--

Wait. What?

😕

Originally posted by bluewaterrider
Me t--

Wait. What?

😕

Funny 👆

Originally posted by carver9
Me too.

Lacking 👇

Originally posted by carver9
Me too.

Even though you're not a Superman fan, I think you'd make a better leader of the House Of El than LoB would if he actually were the ruler. Of course, saying you'd do a better job than him is like saying a prostate examine with an inside-out anti-rape condom is a more pleasant experience than a colonoscopy with a a broken beer bottle.

Don't get me wrong, kal is my favorite superheroes for a lot of reason, the first being the first comic i ever read was Superman nad my Dad bought it for me.

The hate i sometimes have for Superman has to do more of me being on this site and reading some of the stupid shits some of his fans spews out just so the can give him a win.

Also ahbi, you can't claim an author interviews has more power over a written story, that shit doesn't work.

In Sacrifice, Diana did fought Kal near the sun. Hell there was a giant picture of the sun in the background, it was even said they flew to the sun in X amount of times. It's the author fault, not the readers in not conveying it properly.

In any forum, Author's interviews are mostly useless when it contradicts the story they wrote.

Originally posted by SquallX
Don't get me wrong, kal is my favorite superheroes for a lot of reason, the first being the first comic i ever read was Superman nad my Dad bought it for me.

The hate i sometimes have for Superman has to do more of me being on this site and reading some of the stupid shits some of his fans spews out just so the can give him a win.

Also ahbi, you can't claim an author interviews has more power over a written story, that shit doesn't work.

In Sacrifice, Diana did fought Kal near the sun. Hell there was a giant picture of the sun in the background, it was even said they flew to the sun in X amount of times. It's the author fault, not the readers in not conveying it properly.

In any forum, Author's interviews are mostly useless when it contradicts the story they wrote.

No, Wonder Ways once "He's taking me to the Sun!" and that he's going to throw her in it, not it being mentioned numerous times. There's no saying it "x amount of times." Basically, it's assumed they were right by the Sun.

And it's the author's fault if the artist didn't get the scene right?

Originally posted by -Pr-

You cannot use examples of what Batman did with Superman's powers as an argument for Superman's sake ...

Like Superman in the engagement with Darkseid on Kara's behalf, or even Superman's engagement with Diana in Rucka's sacrifice,
Batman had the benefit of sunboosting before dropping the shoe.

I actually don't mind overmuch if people want to post showings like that, but there should be some space devoted to explaining WHY things occur/occurred the way they do/did.

Batman with Superman's powers would be a relatively poor argument for Superman's sake, for instance, not just because Batman started off soaking up energy at the sun itself before engaging the JLA, but also because Batman, one of comicdom's greatest martial artists, is known for throwing arguably THE most effective punches relative to his strength level, of any hero around.

Of COURSE he's going to do major damage to Wonder Woman with his skill, newly suncharged strength, and Wonder Woman's lack of kryptonian-level invulnerability

It's worth pointing out, too, even with Clark's powers and Bruce expecting resistance from Earth's heroes, and being just come from the sun, he nearly got rocked by Wonder Woman's opening "greeting" ...

http://s228.photobucket.com/user/bluewaterrider/library/kmc?sort=3&page=1
(links to images of Superman/Batman #56, part 2 of the so-called "Superbat" storyline)

Originally posted by -Pr-
Don't start pulling the "forgetful Carver" act.

😆 😆

Originally posted by SquallX

In Sacrifice, Diana did [fight] Kal near the sun. Hell there was a giant picture of the sun in the background, it was even said they flew to the sun in X amount of [time]. It's the author fault, not the readers in not conveying it properly.

In any forum, Author's interviews are mostly useless when it contradicts the story they wrote.

Originally posted by Delta1938
No, Wonder Ways once "He's taking me to the Sun!" and that he's going to throw her in it, not it being mentioned numerous times. There's no saying it "x amount of times." Basically, it's assumed they were right by the Sun.

And it's the author's fault if the artist didn't get the scene right?

If you're going by interviews, and think they supercede what is written in the books, you owe Carver an apology, for even P.R. can back up that Rucka said the following, regardless of what may or may not have been released in a later follow-up magazine to Wondy 219:


“We now have a situation where Kal has no reason to hold back at all – EVERY governor is off. He’s going to kill Doomsday, period.

Diana doesn’t want to kill Kal, though – that’s the last thing she wants to do, because Kal is not the problem. The problem is in Max, and she has to stop Max, one way or another. So, the fight is between two opponents who are at very cross purposes – Kal is hitting her with everything he has, and Diana has to do everything she can do to survive that, and move on from that, and get to Max. It’s a pretty grueling fight.”

Why is this thread still open? This is the Hatfields vs. The McCoys, only 1000 times worse. Mary Sue vs. Golden Boy locked in eternal conflict. There can be no winner by definition.

Superman obviously destroys Wonder Woman in under a second with his speed and strength

Originally posted by bluewaterrider
Name a thread in the comics versus forum that isn't.

None of us are dealing with serious graphic novel works like "Maus" here, after all.

Actually, THAT kind of fight, I'd expect Diana to win, not Kal.

I think, deep down, outside of PIS, most people would agree with that.

Absolute, must-win, put-opponent-down-with-finality ... ?

You're describing what Diana, not Kal, was trained to do from a young age.

NOT to the extent of the current DCnU Wonder Woman, mind you.

Pre-Flashpoint Wondy is not nearly so martial as the present incarnation.

But she's still inherently far more lethal than Kal.

I give Superman fight advantage under more ordinary, less serious circumstances, though.

Superman has far more of the claim to winning when it counts than Wonder Woman. Including a number of examples where Wonder Woman was there but not the one to save the day. No, Superman is not the one you want to get into a "saving the day when it most counts" contest, regardless of your opinion on Diana's training and upbringing compared to Clark's.

Originally posted by bluewaterrider
Like Superman in the engagement with Darkseid on Kara's behalf, or even Superman's engagement with Diana in Rucka's sacrifice,
Batman had the benefit of sunboosting before dropping the shoe.

I actually don't mind overmuch if people want to post showings like that, but there should be some space devoted to explaining WHY things occur/occurred the way they do/did.

Batman with Superman's powers would be a relatively poor argument for Superman's sake, for instance, not just because Batman started off soaking up energy at the sun itself before engaging the JLA, but also because Batman, one of comicdom's greatest martial artists, is known for throwing arguably THE most effective punches relative to his strength level, of any hero around.

Of COURSE he's going to do major damage to Wonder Woman with his skill, newly suncharged strength, and Wonder Woman's lack of kryptonian-level invulnerability

It's worth pointing out, too, even with Clark's powers and Bruce expecting resistance from Earth's heroes, and being just come from the sun, he nearly got rocked by Wonder Woman's opening "greeting" ...

http://s228.photobucket.com/user/bluewaterrider/library/kmc?sort=3&page=1
(links to images of Superman/Batman #56, part 2 of the so-called "Superbat" storyline)

No, it's really an assumption that Superman was amped in SACRIFICE. There is some reason to believe it, but there's nothing conclusive, there's evidence against it, and apparently the writer says that's not in the script. But you're also wrong about SuperBat being amped in the team fight.

First off, SuperBat had been avoiding sunlight through the prior issue, Hell it even showed(although not highlighted) him avoiding sunlight in SUPERMAN/BATMAN #54 too. Anyways, he was weakened. Unless the writer forgot about Superman's protective aura, how else would Catwoman scratch his costume(although not him)?

Or Nightwing put-up something of a fight and effect SuperBat? I'm pretty sure Dick didn't have Bruce's jobber aura we see on occasion of him against Top-Tiers. In fact, SuperBat is surprised he felt Nightwing's first attack.

In fact, you look at when SuperBat asks Nightwing if he thought it would work, Nightwing brings-up Superman's powers are fueled by the Sun, and he's stayed in the dark, meaning he thought he'd have a chance. And, we see, he DID effect SuperBat, with Bruce stating surprise he felt the first attack, despite getting owned in the end.