Comic Book Mythbuster

Originally posted by vince_slice
I have no issues, just airing your dirty laundry. When you have entire photobucket albums dedicated to low showings of rival characters, I'll start questionning your integrity.

You have an impressive collection biensalsa:

Hulk limits?
http://s647.photobucket.com/user/biensalsa/library/Marvel%20Comics/Hulks%20limits?sort=3&page=1

Surfer limits?
http://s647.photobucket.com/user/biensalsa/library/Marvel%20Comics/Silver%20Surfer%20LIMITS?sort=3&page=1

Thor limits?
http://s647.photobucket.com/user/biensalsa/library/Marvel%20Comics/Thors%20limits?sort=3&page=1

Thanos limits?
s647.photobucket.com/user/biensalsa/library/Marvel%20Comics/Thanos%20limits?sort=3&page=1

I wonder what other low showings of characters you've collected.

Okay I'll stop.

If we were to really pick judges I'd vote for Jake, Galan, and ODG.

Originally posted by vince_slice
Okay I'll stop.

If we were to really pick judges I'd vote for Jake, Galan, and ODG.

And I will make note of that.

First off would anybody be willing to be judges for this thread?

I wouldn't mind being a judge if people are cool with it.

I voted for you.

This thread needs more Jackethebank action imo.

No disrespect to Jake, Galan or ODG, but those cats have had more then a few run-ins with philo and Abhi lol. Furthermore we pretty damn well know where they stand on the particular issues at hand. That said, we also know that in this particular thread it's basically been abhi (and I guess occasionally Philo?) busting myths of Marvel big dogs.

If I may, Delph is a good choice as he seems to be familiar enough with the material on both ends. Leo seems to be a good choice if he is willing. Digi if he is willing as well. My only reservation is that any so-called judge needs to be versed in the material being debated.

Originally posted by dmills
No disrespect to Jake, Galan or ODG, but those cats have had more then a few run-ins with philo and Abhi lol. Furthermore we pretty damn well know where they stand on the particular issues at hand.

If I may, Delph is a good choice as he seems to be familiar enough with the material on both ends. Leo seems to be a good choice if he is willing. Digi if he is willing as well.

I think those guys you listed would make good judges as well and if they are willing to do it cool.

PM them and ask them if they would be willing to do it.

Originally posted by TheGodKiller
I voted for you.

This thread needs more Jackethebank action imo.

😂

Originally posted by dmills
No disrespect to Jake, Galan or ODG, but those cats have had more then a few run-ins with philo and Abhi lol. Furthermore we pretty damn well know where they stand on the particular issues at hand. That said, we also know that in this particular thread it's basically been abhi (and I guess occasionally Philo?) busting myths of Marvel big dogs.

If I may, Delph is a good choice as he seems to be familiar enough with the material on both ends. Leo seems to be a good choice if he is willing. Digi if he is willing as well. My only reservation is that any so-called judge needs to be versed in the material being debated.

👆

I can see your point. I won't say I don't favor certain characters (ie. Thor) and I won't say that I haven't had "run-ins" with Phil or Abhi, but generally I do think I can look past being a "Thorbag" and be objective. Ultimately, I wouldn't want my presence to derail the thread any more than it has been, so if there's enough consensus against it, I wouldn't be offended by not being a judge, either.

Originally posted by dmills
No disrespect to Jake, Galan or ODG, but those cats have had more then a few run-ins with philo and Abhi lol. Furthermore we pretty damn well know where they stand on the particular issues at hand. That said, we also know that in this particular thread it's basically been abhi (and I guess occasionally Philo?) busting myths of Marvel big dogs.

I see what you're saying, though.

Originally posted by Newjak
Just because someone has had run-ins with another poster does not DQ them from being a judge. Now I will make judgement calls as I see fit but as of right now that would be 2 for Jake 1 against and he is willing to judge.

I think those guys you listed would make good judges as well and if they are willing to do it cool.

PM them and ask them if they would be willing to do it.

But it's beyond the run-ins. Jake and a few of the others have actually been actively "busting" the "busters" so to say. You don't think it's a little salty if suddenly they are the judges?

No disrespect Newjak, but if any of those cats become judges then this thing is a joke from the start. I've said my piece so I'm done. Don't ban me bro 😱

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
😂

👆

I can see your point. I won't say I don't favor certain characters (ie. Thor) and I won't say that I haven't had "run-ins" with Phil or Abhi, but generally I do think I can look past being a "Thorbag" and be objective. Ultimately, I wouldn't want my presence to derail the thread any more than it has been, so if there's enough consensus against it, I wouldn't be offended by not being a judge, either.

As have I. Well, with philo, but who the hell hasn't lol? But abhi and I are pretty tight (as much a pain in the ass as he can be) lol. I believe 100% you can be impartial, just not in this particular case sense you have actually been actively busting the busters so to speak 😂

You, Galan and ODG have basically been the ones keeping this thing from being one sided in what's being presented as a 'Myth'.

Originally posted by dmills
But it's beyond the run-ins. Jake and a few of the others have actually been actively "busting" the "busters" so to say. You don't think it's a little salty if suddenly they are the judges?

No disrespect Newjak, but if any of those cats become judges then this thing is a joke from the start. I've said my piece so I'm done. Don't ban me bro 😱

As have I. Well, with philo, but who the hell hasn't lol? But abhi and I are pretty tight (as much a pain in the ass as he can be) lol. I believe 100% you can be impartial, just not in this particular case sense you have actually been actively busting the busters so to speak 😂

You, Galan and ODG have basically been the ones keeping this thing from being one sided in what's being presented as a 'Myth'.

Busting the Busters is pretty much what the judges will be doing to a degree. So I don't see how that would make them terrible judges or unfit to be judges? Unless I am missing something.

I don't see the point to have judges with Abby. He literally lies and twists pretty much every point he presents.

Philip on the other hand has a lot less "enemies" and tries to speak what he believes is the truth. But he doesn't post much here.

Really, the only person who posts such vastly varying opinions is Abby, and do we need to have judges for some of the uh... Stuff he posts here?
I'd like to see some other people take shots at trying to clear up feats that aren't connected to hate though. Maybe you'd need se judges on those, but right now it's really not needed.

Brando Queerissian speaks the truth. IF judges were used, then whoever chooses to Bust inside this thread[😖hifty:] would have have to accept the 'rulings' given by the judges, whether they agree or not(similar to a tourney.) No arguing. No pages-long debating.

If the majority of judges agree, great. If they don't agree, better luck next time... But somehow, I doubt that it would ever be that simple. /shrug

Judges would be good.

[QUOTE=14308502]Originally posted by vince_slice
I have no issues, just airing your dirty laundry. When you have entire photobucket albums dedicated to low showings of rival characters, I'll start questionning your integrity.

You have an impressive collection biensalsa:

Hulk limits?
http://s647.photobucket.com/user/biensalsa/library/Marvel%20Comics/Hulks%20limits?sort=3&page=1

Surfer limits?
http://s647.photobucket.com/user/biensalsa/library/Marvel%20Comics/Silver%20Surfer%20LIMITS?sort=3&page=1

Thor limits?
http://s647.photobucket.com/user/biensalsa/library/Marvel%20Comics/Thors%20limits?sort=3&page=1

Thanos limits?
s647.photobucket.com/user/biensalsa/library/Marvel%20Comics/Thanos%20limits?sort=3&page=1

I wonder what other low showings of characters you've collected. [/ QUOTE]

Lol having those folders make me a bad guy?

Listen my friend most of those showings HAVE CONTEXT! And I will certantly not use them in a debate if they are right out low showings.

You think in a serious debate the scan of hulk bouncing out of goliath's chest is gong to hold any water?

Most of those scans will fit on the character ownage thread and is probably myfault for choosing the folder name poorly for the funny scans, but hey, I dont have enought time to put order on all those scans, so lawl for getting all emotional about my pb folders.

Next time Ill try to not upset you or giving you the wrong impression, on a second though, I honestly dont care.

Most of those scans have context behind and only a noob will use them on a real debate 😂

Sorry I think this is hillarious 😂

I reluctantly accept the role of judge.

It think Galan is a god choice.

Jake I feel is good but no offense, sometimes I feel he sides to much for his favorite as most of us do.

Leo gives me the impresion of being centered, but that is IMO.

Cogito gives me the same idea also Nibedecus thouh sometimes I feel he tends to lean towards MU, not too much. IMO

I despise you all equally. I'll do it.

Originally posted by -Pr-
I despise you all equally. I'll do it.

You are a Mod and house of el.

No one can trust you, you will probably do the raptor's or Abhi's bidding. 😠

Originally posted by Rao Kal El
You are a Mod and house of el.

No one can trust you, you will probably do the raptor's or Abhi's bidding. 😠

Oh, now you've done it.