I actually do think that over time someone can become gay.
Again I think it would have to do with the person itself and how open minded he or she is. And what triggers it.
This is something that's happen to me. I am now Bi. And i was never interested sexually with guys. Its just something that has grown over time thanks to someone. glare
Anyways, i have my standers. I respect the straight one's. I'm not really attracted to them. srug
Originally posted by SpearofDestiny
So he liking girls was.... ?
Don't a large majority of gay men first fool around with women, before they fully accept that they're just really attracted to men and are indeed homosexual?
Your ex was never straight, he might have had straight sex, but he was gay all along.
Originally posted by SpearofDestiny
Yes, I just think they are the minorityAnd as for studies, I've read studies where a decent percentage of straight men have responded to gay porn. So either the tendency is common, or all those men lied.
I don't think I'd hazard a guess, but more or less I agree that 100% gay/straight is probably the minority. That could be totally related to my personal experience though.
As far as studies go, none of them would have been self-report, that would be useless. I'd need to see the study you are talking about, I'll see if I can find this other one I heard about recently where straight men were not turned on by gay porn.
Originally posted by Devil King
A lot of things don't help the species reproduce. It's a fasle assumption that evolution is a direct basis for propogation or betterment of the species. This is why intellignet design or creationism is a false assumption.I don't understand how you can say gay people don't want to admit that others are not gay or weren't born that way, because it takes away from gays being ""special"", then?
You did or you did not say that gays don't want others to claim they used to be straight because it takes away from being""special""?
We've been over this already, it doesn't help the species reproduce.
Also, when you try to convey what I have said, things are lost in translation. I worded things a specific way for a reason. 😉
Can I still come over? I have plenty of vacation time.
Originally posted by dadudemon
We've been over this already, it doesn't help the species reproduce.Also, when you try to convey what I have said, things are lost in translation. I worded things a specific way for a reason. 😉
Can I still come over? I have plenty of vacation time.
So you never said that gay's don't feel a need to portray themselves as "special"?
Originally posted by Robtard
Your ex was never straight, he might have had straight sex, but he was gay all along.
I had sex with women. I'm not representative, though. I know a number of gay men that never had sex with women.
Originally posted by Leo.M
Yes.
So you don't like men, you just like anyone that fulfills the stereotypical female role?
Originally posted by Devil King[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=10224870]Originally posted by dadudemon
Some homosexuals don't like that idea...they think it takes away from the "specialness" of being homosexual...
Is that the same things as this?
Originally posted by Devil King
So you never said that gay's don't feel a need to portray themselves as "special"?
And also, does taking that one part of my quote actually portray my complete intentions? Read the first 'sentence" again...
Originally posted by dadudemon
Some homosexuals don't like that idea...they think it takes away from the "specialness" of being homosexual...but I don't blame them for thinking that because "Christians" think it necessary to persecute them for something they were most likely born with.
You would do well as a journalist, wouldn't you? 😛
This is the kind of stuff that I was talking about in the other thread.
Originally posted by dadudemonIs that the same things as this?
And also, does taking that one part of my quote actually portray my complete intentions? Read the first 'sentence" again...
You would do well as a journalist, wouldn't you? 😛
This is the kind of stuff that I was talking about in the other thread.
What you're trying to do is imply that christians think they're special "legitimately", so you can understand why homosexuals can get uppity and think they are as well. But that ignores my point; that homosexuals do not think they're special. Most christians do, based on their religion or some assumed understanding of the world that no one else gets. Homosexuals (at least the ones you're talking about) think they're the same as everyone else, which is why there's no legitimate reason for them to be treated differently or seperately. Most christians confuse "gay rights" as assuming gay people want "special" rights; but they only want the same rights you so arrogantly think are yours to hand out to others. Don't hide behind the idea that your point changes simply because I didn't include the last half of your sentence.
Originally posted by Robtard
Don't a large majority of gay men first fool around with women, before they fully accept that they're just really attracted to men and are indeed homosexual?
No. Gay men who sleep with women only do so because they want to cover up. If they actually enjoy sleeping with women, then thier not gay.
Originally posted by Robtard
Your ex was never straight, he might have had straight sex, but he was gay all along.
Yes he was. He was only aroused by women. A gay man can't be aroused by women, to that extant, if he's 100% gay.