Originally posted by Creshosk
Done or not. Digi>Joey Stacks.Real strong evidence of this is the rule change in the middle of the tourny.
Or Stacks > Digi
Real strong evidence of this is his 'failure to disprove Digi's prep' which was sufficient to lead to an out and out ban of his illegal maneuvers.
Though, I'm not surprised to see you bitter about it. 😂
Originally posted by Creshosk
What about using matter manip to create the components for the tech, to be assembled by the tech heads? Creating silicone shouldn't be too hard, nor metal wiring. The tech heads can then assemble the components into machinery. This is how I understood Digi's plan to work, or else at least with being told by the tech heads you could create slightly more clpmplex with circut boards being the silicone circuit boards with the wires attatched to it in ways that the tech heads describe.Mutliple is simply more than one. I have my suspicions as to whom the other person is as he succeeded in the past with complaining about something and getting it banned.
1. the thing is even when you have all the necessary parts...oftentimes assembling is pretty time consuming. Now, when you have tech as complex as some brought up in these tournies, sometimes it seems a bit unrealistic (to me at least) of the things that are built in such short time...even factoring the geniuses involved.
2. yeah, I guess multiple is simply more than 1, but usually when that term is used, it implies more than two.
Stacks, post something besides your biased opinion occasionally. I posted the very lines where she approved it (multiple times, mind you). I've never once said what I think about the ruling, I've posted what I know from Evangel's words. You just got lucky that enough complaining paid off...at this rate you'll annoy everyone out of the tourney and take the victory here soon. Bravo on finding a nigh-unstoppable debating tactic ( 🙄 ). And here you are attacking me again. Or is it that you just want to continue taking shots at someone who dropped out? Or who doesn't share your opinion on something, like every debate you seem to get into on teh forums?
This juvenile crap is what makes tourneys so much less than what they could be. I had fun against goober in what was a great match. Then we get a bunch of knee-jerk reactions and b*tching and it saps away my chance to compete. That's what you could be Joey, and what tourneys could be if we weren't so intent on being arrogant, whiny, and disrespecful all the time.
Originally posted by Papa SmurphThat's a bald faced lie if I've ever seen one. I've tasted your metal... and your 'meat'. 😂 Digi is level headed and is convincing. You seem to whine alot more.
Or Stacks > Digi
Originally posted by Papa SmurphAnd you still have that reading comprehension problem. Digi was winning. You ***** and get the rules changed. Clearly you couldn't deal with him so had to move the goal posts to win. Couldn't win otherwise.
Real strong evidence of this is his 'failure to disprove Digi's prep' which was sufficient to lead to an out and out ban of his illegal maneuvers.
Originally posted by Papa SmurphI'm just sick of your shit. And I never had a very high opinion of you since your little scenerio that got you banned. Remember that or does losing debates cause you to forget things?
Though, I'm not surprised to see you bitter about it. 😂
Originally posted by Creshosk
That's a bald faced lie if I've ever seen one. I've tasted your metal... and your 'meat'. 😂 Digi is level headed and is convincing. You seem to whine alot more.
See, lies, I pointed out (in my first post) that Digi didn't have instant tech and he whined and now you're upset that he violated the rules. It's okay little guy, life goes on. But feel free to continually anti-vote me in all my matches out of spite like you planned on doing throughout the tourney little one. 🙂
PS: I hope the tourney director is taking notes of these unwarranted attacks from uninvolved 3rd parties to see the 'integrity' (bias) that goes on behind the votes (and randomly bringing up bitter agony over losing past debates that I had forgotten about).
Originally posted by Papa SmurphWhich you failed to prove and had to get the rules CHANGED in order to be right... Or did you not pick up on that fact?
See, lies, I pointed out (in my first post) that Digi didn't have instant tech and he whined and now you're upset that he violated the rules.
Originally posted by Papa SmurphITs a debate tourny. You suck at debating. My votes reflect that. You fail to convince anyone of your case. Everyone else's votes reflect this as well. (Or had you not noticed that you technically lost the match with digi?)
[B]It's okay little guy, life goes on. But feel free to continually anti-vote me in all my matches out of spite like you planned on doing throughout the tourney little one. 🙂
Originally posted by Papa SmurphIf she nulls my votes based on the past then she will truly failed as a director as a tournament. Hey I may be biased... but your arguments suck all the same.
PS: I hope the tourney director is taking notes of these unwarranted attacks from uninvolved 3rd parties to see the 'integrity' (bias) that goes on behind the votes (and randomly bringing up bitter agony over losing past debates that I had forgotten about).
Creshosk you really shouldn't take it so hard, man, it's only comics, smile 🙂.
It's a debate tournament and one of the first things I did was point out the flaw in his plan which was a clear violation of the rules.
The voters didn't even consider anything I had to say and (for the most part) clearly went in with the intent of Digi wins regardless. You say I had the rules changed, what rule did she change?
The fact that you're are defending Digi's ability to make instant tech because his power is matter manipulation and not tech related just shows your credibility is shot.
"It's a debate tournament and you suck at debating"
Yet I've hurt your feelings and made you look silly on multiple occasions
doped
I think I realized one of Joey's (fail) tactics. He attacks people, insults them, complains and whines, gets upset when they disagree with him...
...then says something like "people take this too seriously" or "don't take it so hard...it's just comics" when they return in kind. I've received it 4-5 times now, and it's usually when I'm saying something to the affect of "calm down and be respectful" so it's hard to even know how to respond. Say stupid stuff, or attack us, and there will be consequences in one form or another. To think we take it "too seriously" is a joke. We just don't suffer fools gladly, as the saying goes.
Originally posted by Papa SmurphHypocrisy, nice. 🙂
Creshosk you really shouldn't take it so hard, man, it's only comics, smile 🙂.
Originally posted by Papa SmurphIts not your failure to grasp the rules that bugs me. Its the ad hominem that you imploy. as it is a DEBATE tournament. there are certain rules that follow with debates that you should follow.
It's a debate tournament and one of the first things I did was point out the flaw in his plan which was a clear violation of the rules.
Originally posted by Papa SmurphBecause they voted against you, obviously its their fault for not listening to you.
The voters didn't even consider anything I had to say
Hey everyone you hear that? It's your fault as the judges for Stack's loss. Not his, his opinion is worth more than all of your opinions.
Originally posted by Papa SmurphWere you not paying attention?
and (for the most part) clearly went in with the intent of Digi wins regardless. You say I had the rules changed, what rule did she change?
She said she was changing a rule. Or did you miss that?
Originally posted by Papa SmurphThis coming from you?
The fact that you're are defending Digi's ability to make instant tech because his power is matter manipulation and not tech related just shows your credibility is shot.
Your approval would fill me with shame. So go ahead and talk about my credibility after attacking the judges and saying your opinion is better than theirs.
Originally posted by Papa SmurphAnd yet you're the only one who feels this way.. Funny no?
"It's a debate tournament and you suck at debating"Yet I've hurt your feelings and made you look silly on multiple occasions
Originally posted by Papa Smurph"Dope"ed is right.
doped
Originally posted by Papa Smurph
Tell him! 😂
...pretty sure it was directed at you chief. Saying 2+2 = fish doesn't make it true.
Originally posted by The Ghosty
I am telling you, you just seem to want to annoy him while acting like a prat yourselfCan someone show me the doctored picture he used please?
It's a character called "The Doctor" ...not a doctored picture.
...
Also, to Joey:
Originally posted by DigiMark007
This isn't as a debate, but I'm just curious: after having posted all the different times where she said my prep was ok (which I'm hoping you read), do you still think it was always illegal? Or do you realize (correctly) that it was changed? Because if it's the former, you're just not reading what was written, and saying whatever you think best supports your cause. It's not even an opinion, it would just be objectively, provably, test-ably, wrong. If it's the latter, at least you understand the situation correctly, though you still insist on attacking me about it.My plan is illegal. Now. But it wasn't when our match started, and had been declared ok in past instances when I asked about it. I just hope, for your own sake, you're able to comprehend that and that you don't simply form your interpretation to your will. Because it's just destructive self-delusion otherwise.
Originally posted by CreshoskIts not your failure to grasp the rules that bugs me. Its the ad hominem that you imploy. as it is a DEBATE tournament. there are certain rules that follow with debates that you should follow.
Yup, and I followed the rules, hence why my tactics are all perfectly legal and why my plan was clearly more feasible then Digi's I do 20 hours of work in 15 minutes foolishness.
doped