Originally posted by llagrokshe pretty much stated in a previous debate that votes must be accompanied by a brief explanation or else they will not be counted
Was there a rule before you started nullifying votes that you didn't agree with? I mean that didn't agree with said rule.
there are some people who will vote for someone just because they're friends and others who will vote against someone because they don't like them
asking for a reason also insures that people actually READ the debate before they vote
and it's pretty odd coincidence how one person got most of the votes with no explanations whatsover and before the debate even ended