Which Side Do You Support?

Started by LORD JLRTENJAC6 pages

But everything is Bullocks to you Kane.

Most things are bollocks actually, but your kiddy vendetta iss funny. By all means, carry on.

ONTOPIC: Jedi or Sith, Jedi or Sith, Jedi or Sith. Nope, I abstain and stick my noggin in with the Smugglers, Pilots and Everymen of SW.

if sith weren't all evil power hungry bastards and leaders of the empire didn't ge corrupted then i'd be with the sith, but since they all have those qualities then i side with the jedi (however they are greatly flawed) the NJO (like in legacy of the force and stuff) is set up differently like it's not the power thats forbidden it's how you use it (i.e. using force lighting to torture somebody=dark side, using force lighting to power something or kill an universally evil person=light side) that's just from what i've heard though i've yet to read them, although i've read summaries.
but as they saw, power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely. and it's true look at our history. and i read somewhere somebody talked about how good always wins, it's not true looke at the Galactic Empire, good lost there but eventually won and then in Legacy good lost and has yet to win. but even so again it's a trait wierdly shared with history good always wins in this world (both persian invasions and WW2 are just 3 examples)

The Jedi, obviously. They're all about selflessly defending the galaxy and, you know, not throwing it in darkness and committing mass murder.

Originally posted by Darth Exodus
Only for some. For the strong it is luxury.

What? No they don't.

God. When I read your pseudo-badass posts they frustrate me so much I want to punch a terminally ill orphan in the face.

Originally posted by exanda kane
Most things are bollocks actually, but your kiddy vendetta iss funny. By all means, carry on.

ONTOPIC: Jedi or Sith, Jedi or Sith, Jedi or Sith. Nope, I abstain and stick my noggin in with the Smugglers, Pilots and Everymen of SW.

I'll gladly throw my lot in with the everymen too, actually. While it was the training provided by Kenobi and Yoda and the efforts of Luke that finally ended Palpatine's reign, he could never have even destroyed the Death Star without Han Solo flying in to save his hide....

but even so again it's a trait wierdly shared with history good always wins in this world (both persian invasions and WW2 are just 3 examples)

Ever heard of Stalin? Or the Romans? Sparticus? Hannibal? Jesus? Alexander? Joan Of Arc? Troy? Julius Caesar? Cleopatra? Vietnam? And dare I say it.... Iraq?

God. When I read your pseudo-badass posts they frustrate me so much I want to punch a terminally ill orphan in the face.

You should!!! It's very Fun!!!

Originally posted by exanda kane

Yeah, it would be funny if you were nut enough to believe a pulp ideology from SW.

Me kinda believes that 😮‍💨

God. When I read your pseudo-badass posts they frustrate me so much I want to punch a terminally ill orphan in the face.

And then you should tell them 'your mamma' jokes. That'll really set them off.

Constant conflict forces a person to stretch to their full ability and then exceed that. Do you think that Luke would be half the Jedi that he was without Sidious? Or Anakin half of what he was without Dooku?

Originally posted by Captain REX
I'll gladly throw my lot in with the everymen too, actually. While it was the training provided by Kenobi and Yoda and the efforts of Luke that finally ended Palpatine's reign, he could never have even destroyed the Death Star without Han Solo flying in to save his hide....

I have to agree here, but when it comes to the underlying philosophies between the Jedi and sith, I have to stick with the Jedi.

Originally posted by exanda kane
Most things are bollocks actually, but your kiddy vendetta iss funny. By all means, carry on.

From your point of view. But then again, believe it or not, your point of view can be wrong.

Being responsible and not greedy >> taking what they want, then dying a week later.

Better 1 day of passion than a life of peace.
'O, for a life of sensations rather than thought'(or something)-Keats.

Why do you respond to what I say in fragments like that? Do you read it, have nothing to say, then think of something badass while in the middle of a raid on WoW and race back here to say it?

Originally posted by Darth Exodus
Ever heard of Stalin? Or the Romans? Sparticus? Hannibal? Jesus? Alexander? Joan Of Arc? Troy? Julius Caesar? Cleopatra? Vietnam? And dare I say it.... Iraq?

You should!!! It's very Fun!!!

ya i have, like i said those were just three examples but Vietnam as never really ended, they just stopped fighting each other because of how long it was, and iraq has very little to do with 'evil' unless your talking about the black evil that they are drilling out of iraq, putting them in containers and shipping it right back to america. and dont get me started on jesus 😛

Originally posted by LORD JLRTENJAC
From your point of view. But then again, believe it or not, your point of view can be wrong.

Aye, from my point of view laddie. What is your point? No, wait, I remember - you're the guy with no constructive arguments nor points whatsoever aren't you? Good fo ryou sonny jim.

ON TOPIC: JEEDI ISK BADB.

Which do I support?

I would like to bash their heads together.

Originally posted by exanda kane
Aye, from my point of view laddie. What is your point? No, wait, I remember - you're the guy with no constructive arguments nor points whatsoever aren't you? Good fo ryou sonny jim.

ON TOPIC: JEEDI ISK BADB.

Ah, that's right, you're the one who can't argue without throwing insults... I forgot.

And with that I'm done... for now.

Originally posted by LORD JLRTENJAC
Ah, that's right, you're the one who can't argue without throwing insults... I forgot.

And with that I'm done... for now.

Aye, honestly if you find yourself in a debate with a complete tosspot you will understand that you just get plain bored through the lack of your opponents argument.

ONTOPIC: ISK JEEDI HAV HATS AN STUFF, WELLAS SABERISHK. WE WELLKE SABERISHK. SWISHK SWISHK. SITHI DONT KRUEK.

niether. i support kreia. the force is a threat to itself and takes countless lives because of the extremes that it forces upon others. who do i like better? not the jedi, and not the sith... i choose... ZAYNE CARRICK!!!! yea... lmao... sith have way cooler abilities, clothes, and lightsabers. (i like the orange one from kotor 2).

the jedi are far too passive and weak, and the sith are far too aggresive and evil. balance is the way.
jedi need to learn a little bit of freedom and become more aggresive in learning powers and combat styles. the way they outcast anyone who acts aggresive is the way that was eventually their end twice and the begining of the two new jedi orders. (first the exile's new jedi order, and then luke skywalkers) if they would learn that emotions and feelings are acceptable and that agressive attacks are necessary sometimes for the greater good, then they would eventually prevale. no dam bastard ever won a war by dying for his country... they won the war by making the other dam bastard die for his country!--general patton.

and the sith are just pure evil and intent upon hurting others... this is their flaw.

Revan never did anything especially evil, or Exar Kun, or Bane, or Qel'Droma, or (to my knowledge) Maul.

Originally posted by Darth Exodus
Revan never did anything especially evil, or Exar Kun, or Bane, or Qel'Droma, or (to my knowledge) Maul.

Revan : Betraying the republic and leading to the slaughter of hundreds od jedi is not especialy evil?! dont even get me started on the star forge thing.

Exar Kun: Enslaving the massassi people?

Bane: That dude breathed "especially evil" He went around to various planets sluaghtering people

ulic: Killing his brother, i think thats espacially evil

maul: he slaughteres qui-gon, c'mon?