Originally posted by Bardock42
Though true, I don't accept I know what you are but what am I, insults.
Stupid German... it wasn't an insult. It's from a silly anti-drug commercial.
Father finds a bag of marijuana in his son's bedroom, so he confronts him and asks "where did you learn to do this!?", the son responds with "I learned it from you, dad!"
Originally posted by RobtardAnd that works? Did anyone stop smoking marijuhana because of it? Are there statistics. Also, was that public money wasted on persecuting a harmless, yet possibly awesome drug?
Stupid German... it wasn't an insult. It's from a silly anti-drug commercial.Father finds a bag of marijuana in his son's bedroom, so he confronts him and asks "where did you learn to do this!?", the son responds with "I learned it from you, dad!"
I personally believe that there are mysteries in this world which may seem supernatural, but if we were to study them more, we would eventually find logical and scientificly supported explanations for them all.
I am open to the possibility that this man may have been on the verge of death, and somehow his body recovered. It's not the first time I hear and read documented cases of a person surviving what should have killed them.
But I don't attribute this to God. Why should it be ?
I believe the human body is potentially stronger than we give it credit for. Amazing feats of recovery and healing can occur, but i dont think they should be deemed "miracles".
Even animals in the wild survive severe conditions, and turn out okay in the end. Why can't humans ?
Well, that wasn't the point of what I was trying to say. Thanks for responding to that part, and not the rest. 👆
After browsing through this topic all I saw was on one side the religious wing saying pretty much claiming that healing and recovery can only be done through a deity, and that a human being cannot heal on thier own- while at the same time, if a human being does not heal despite asking for help in God, it's thier own fault, not God's.
On the other hand, I hear the atheist wing pretty much claim that recovery from usually fatal occurances is impossible.
I disagree with both sides, as I already explained why.
Originally posted by RobtardHa, I win.
You know, slyly switching the topic from your stupidity might work on lesser beings. But, I'll let this one go.I doubt it worked; it was probably as useful as the Nancy Reagan "just say no" campaign.
As for gaylord, I don't see how the "atheist wing" claims "that recovery from usually fatal occurances is impossible".
Originally posted by SpearofDestiny
Well, that wasn't the point of what I was trying to say. Thanks for responding to that part, and not the rest. 👆After browsing through this topic all I saw was on one side the religious wing saying pretty much claiming that healing and recovery can only be done through a deity, and that a human being cannot heal on thier own- while at the same time, if a human being does not heal despite asking for help in God, it's thier own fault, not God's.
On the other hand, I hear the atheist wing pretty much claim that recovery from usually fatal occurances is impossible.
I disagree with both sides, as I already explained why.
You're welcome.
I don't think anyone said "healing only comes from God" or "people never recovery from fatal injuries".
What was being said: "If someone recovers from a fatal injury [and science can't explain it], it MUST be God." or "It was probably a misdiagnoses."