Thor vs Superman

Started by Creshosk453 pages

Originally posted by Phantom Zone
Well weve decided that Thor was not refering to the pie but the blocking so theres no need to discuss it. Just to add...your example doesnt fit anyway. Matter is denser in Asagard than on earth and Thor has billions of tons of strength.
So the pis was not moving at the speed of light but the shield was, so the pie was traveling at a normal thrown speed but the sheild came up at light speed... Relevancy of the neccesitation of the sheild blocking at lightspeed when the attack wasn't?

The point of you throwing the paper is to show that you are much stronger than is needed to hurl the paper.
paper=pie
you=thor

How fast can you chuck that relitively weightless piece of paper?

Originally posted by Phantom Zone
Superman? Wasnt denying that but I dont think that automatically means Thor loses.

Somebody posted scans of Thor afterwards on the next page and DD was not around.

http://img165.imageshack.us/img165/9084/98917483ht4.jpg

It's still not for a couple of more panels. Again, we onle SEE one hit. that does not mean that that was the ONLY hit thor got off on DD. The KO itself could still have been off panel. Its speculation to say that one hit KO'd him as we do NOT see DD down and out.

Originally posted by Creshosk
So the pis was not moving at the speed of light but the shield was, so the pie was traveling at a normal thrown speed but the sheild came up at light speed... Relevancy of the neccesitation of the sheild blocking at lightspeed when the attack wasn't?

The point of you throwing the paper is to show that you are much stronger than is needed to hurl the paper.
paper=pie
you=thor

How fast can you chuck that relitively weightless piece of paper?

It's still not for a couple of more panels. Again, we onle SEE one hit. that does not mean that that was the ONLY hit thor got off on DD. The KO itself could still have been off panel. Its speculation to say that one hit KO'd him as we do NOT see DD down and out.

wellll a lot of the guys we see supes punch in the same melee we don't see again an I would still say that he took then out. but it's just my opion maybe only a few like five villians only got beat while the other just kept geting changed out. I guess it's possible.

Originally posted by Ricardo Potter
They are usually unusable but this is canon so if some people desired ti wouldn't be against the rules to use it.

Ignoring comic sense is the same as PIS. Forum rules doesn't care if crossovers are canon. It just says 'because they often ignore common sense' and not 'because they are not canon'.

Originally posted by Phantom Zone
Er if you look at the first time Thor striked the ground Balder was going to hit him with his sword....so im assuming thats what happened the sceond time.

😆

Originally posted by jasofisc
so I was thinking about the superman building a city in how ever long it was. I'm convinced that it was only a few seconds (if that) however I was also thinking about things like momentum and friction and the like. I think that scan shows exactly how riduculus writers can be. If supes was trying to touch matter at near light speed (and he would have to go faster then that to do what he did) that whole speshal reltivty would kick in increasing his mass and if that some how didn't happen (it is a theory after all even though dc comps to this theroy) then what about momentum anthing he would touch like glass or wood or rock or metal it would blow up or shatter or something to that effect and while superman may be protected by friction the matterals he touches would not be. So I rank that feat up their with cap taking it to a king thor. it is plot induced stupidty. Just a thought not saying that has much to do with this fight. on and I think my opion on it all is that current thor (baring that he is not a skrull and still has the odin force) dispite what anybody has said takes this 10 out of 10 if curent thor is just the same as classic thor then he gets 4.5 out of 10 wins
Superman has got tactile kinesis. He fixed Bizarro city the same way he held up half a building using glass windows as fingergrips in Infinite Crisis #2 and fixed that one. As far as I see, the rebuilding Bizarro city scan is not PIS. Consider it this way: If you read the rest of the comic, you'll notice that everything in Bizarro world is pretty simple, architecturally speaking. Bizarro himself created it with his newfound powers. Even looking at the panel of Superman placing the globe on top, the building looks like it was designed by children with lego blocks. Therefore, with Superman's tactile kinesis and large simple pieces of debris strewn about, he could just place them back together easily. Bizarro city also appeared to be quite small compared to Metropolis, so you have an advantage of smaller scale. Tactile kinesis + simple Bizarro-designed architecture + fewer buildings = Superman rebuilding Bizarro city without PIS.

And King Thor was not only stripped of the Odinpower by Dr. Strange's amulet, but he had his arm torn off by Hulk and Thing in a H2H battle that took hours. Cap coming in at the peak of King Thor's exhaustion and whacking him isn't really PIS. Especially when you consider how hard he punches and kicks guys like Rhino, Mr. Hyde, Thunderball, Hulk and others.

I still believe classic Thor takes it 6/10. Current Odinforce Thor 9/10 curbstomp.

Originally posted by h1a8
But it's also speculation to think that a fire looking blast is going light speed. Read the captions again. It says nothing of the blast moving at instananeous speeds. I already know what it says and means, I just want to give you a chance to interpret it correctly. Telepathy isn't the same as a telepathic blast. Thus you can't equate the two. She still telegraphed.

It can't be proven that the blast is lightspeed. Only speculation at best. Bad logic. Your hands can move much much faster than your legs can. Think about it. Also, one doesn't need to move their arms as fast as the beam in order to block it. This is because the beam moves a larger distance than your arms do in the same amount of time. I used the word canon to mean acceptable. Crossovers are not valid here on this forum since they usually ignore common sense.

A telepathic bolt instantaneosly races towards Thor. As far as I've seen, a telepathic bolt attack from an entity like Phoenix is going the speed of light. The fire has nothing to do with the speed of the bolt, that's just the way the Phoenix manifests her power. It isn't actual fire and considering her cosmic power, I think it's less arguable that the fiery nature of the telepathic bolt is indicative of a slower speed. It's your opinion that Phoenix's telepathic bolt is moving at the speed of Human Torch's fire bolt. I don't think it's a particularly good one considering Phoenix's cosmically powered nature, the telepathic nature of the attack and the caption that describes it as instaneous.

And telegraphing only helps when you have read the person's attack BEFORE it was fired and got yourself intoa defensive position BEFORE it was fired. I can telegraph someone raising a gun at me and raising my shield to block it before it was fired. But no amount of telegraphing is going to help me raise my shield AFTER the bullet was fired unless my arms move faster then the bullet. What don't you get about this? Telegraphing has nothing to do with the Thor/Phoenix scan. AFTER the telepathic bolt was fired, Thor had his hands down. He had to raise them quickly enough AFTER it was fired to defend himself and he did. Which makes his reflexes faster than the telepathic bolt and FTL. Telegraphing has nothing to do with the feat.

Originally posted by h1a8
I use handbooks all the way friend. And if there is an error then I don't use that specific info but I still use the rest of the handbook. Comics have errors too. So by your logic we shouldn't use comics either. I accept both comics and handbooks as the absolute truth [B]until proven false. Kinda like innocent until proven guilty.[/b]
That's your standard. That's fine. I merely don't accept it for aforementioned reasons. And since a Marvel handbook references JLA/Avengers, then you should accept that crossover as truth whether or not you believe it involves common sense. If handbooks are truth to you, then so is JLA/Avengers until it is proven false. You haven't proven it false by your standards. If you continue to reject JLA/Avengers simply because you don't like it, then that's your biased opinion. But you can't legimately expect me to accept any of your arguments when the basis for validity of proof is your personal bias. Debating is about what is more reasonable, not about what is more akin to your personal bias.
Originally posted by h1a8
Yet you seen him not come short. Faulty logic here. A black hole slows you down. Superman wouldn't face this restriction in his battle with Thor.

SS can't achieve light speed instanteously. It takes him at least second to reach lightspeed. There is one exception though (the IG saga). I take that feat as PIS since there was several times SS used all his strength to travel as fast as he can and only achieved light speed after a second. Also, I don't infer travel speed to battle speed. One must have the necessary reflexes, instant burst speed (from rest), and the ability to move limbs (arms, legs, torso, etc.) fast as well. Superman has performed many very complex tasks seemingly FTL (from rest). That's why I say we can substitute these complex tasks into simple zips and punches.

Oh ho. I can show you plenty of times that Superman has come up short with speed. I can show you multiple examples of him failing to save innocent lives because he couldn't accelerate fast enough to save them. He's come up short... a lot EVEN when he's explicitly stated to go all out and not holding back.

Show me these "several times" where Silver Surfer requires at least a second to reach lightspeed. Because I've got scans where Superman had a second to reach a target with his speed and failing. I also have scans of Superman speedblitzing an opponent and starting out at hypersonic speeds before reaching light speeds. So I have proof that contradicts Superman being able to instaneously achieve light speeds. I'd like to see your proof that contradicts Silver Surfer being able to instantaneously achieve light speeds.

And I quote, "Superman has performed many very complex tasks seemingly FTL (from rest)." So he seemingly does it at FTL speeds and that is enough evidence to convince you that he can not only do it at FTL speeds, but also speedblitz at FTL speeds. Whereas, in your mind... we have Phoenix, who seemingly shoots a telepathic bolt at light speed and Thor blocking it AFTER it was shot... but that's not enough evidence to convince you that Thor has FTL reflexes? Smells more like personal bias. If you like to extend certain freedoms to Superman and not Thor... that's your opinion, but it weakens your arguments considerably. Either it's clear or it's not. If it reasonable to assume, then apply that same "reasonableness" fairly across the board otherwise you're not debating, you're just expressing personal and biased opinions.

Originally posted by h1a8
This is PIS by statistics. That scan only shows SS speaking in figurative language. There was no nanosecond anything as it contradicts his entire history. Thus it was hyperbole or PIS. Again you wasted time typing here. The feat was PIS. But I understand what you mean about nanosecond and light. I already knew this a long time ago. I just wanted to see if you can figure it out. Good job!
I don't see why it contradicts Silver Surfer. I don't see why it is PIS. It's clear. It's on-panel. You like Superman's seemingly FTL scans but you don't Silver Surfer's clear FTL scans? You already don't like his Infinity Gauntlet scan, now this one has to go too? Well, just FYI... I like em. And when I take the entire history of Silver Surfer, those scans make much more sense to me and are not contradicted by anything. If you have scans that clearly contradict them, show em to me. I'll be willing to accept clearly contradictory scans and reassess my positions.

The real questions are: 1) Do you have any or are you just expressing your personal bias as argumentative proof? and 2) Will you accept the clear scans which I have, that contradict Superman's instantaneous light speed capabilities? Answer yes or no to these questions.

Originally posted by h1a8
PIS okay. Also, Gladiator and Hyperion have nothing to do with Thor. Otherwise I can say that Hulk can move faster than light since he struck Thor, SS, etc. I can also say that since a gas station seemingly koed Superman then gas stations>>>Superman. And I already shown you that arms move a lot faster than feet and waists.

Good try but Superman is faster and will beat Thor to the punch. Thor must begin on the defensive. Especially if Superman instant appears behind him.

You like to throw PIS around a lot. Let me just tell you something. PIS refers to a character's ability to fight to the fullest of his capability. The plot he's in makes him stupid and therefore he does not do things he should be able to do. Surfer instantly going FTL in 'Infinity Gauntlet' is not PIS. Surfer with his nanosecond reaction times is not PIS. If you tryt ot apply PIS to this, it makes no sense. Silver Surfer was made stupid because of the plot and he instantly reached light speed? Silver Surfer was made stupid by the plot and he reacted with nanosecond reaction times? You misunderstand what PIS is. A lot of people do. Most of the time, I understand what you're saying, but let's get it straight. Between you and me, you are questioning the reasonableness and validity of a high-end feat. Not whether the plot made the character stupid. So just say it, because I'm tired of seeing you label these things as PIS as if it means anything. Until you can contradict these clear scans with your own, you can't argue PIS or your version of PIS anyway. Only that it is your personal bias that informs you to reject the scans.
Originally posted by h1a8
Note: Superman needs only 1 hit on Thor to win. And since Superman is faster he has a great chance of hitting Thor first. Thus he must win the majority.
Superman needs one hit to win against Thor? Sounds like your personal bias just got elevated to fanboyism. Let me ask this question: Would Superman one-shot Wonderwoman, Equus, Subjekt-17, Mongul, Captain Marvel, Black Adam, the General, etc?

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
that's your biased opinion. But you can't legimately expect me to accept any of your arguments when the basis for validity of proof is your personal bias. Debating is about what is more reasonable, not about what is more akin to your personal bias.
Smells more like personal bias.
you're just expressing personal and biased opinions.
1) Do you have any or are you just expressing your personal bias as argumentative proof?
Only that it is your personal bias that informs you to reject the scans.
Sounds like your personal bias just got elevated to fanboyism.

OneDumbg0 fails at following rules again

Fanboy! Biased! Influenced!

So you're debating over who is stronger, The Flesh or The Incomprehensible Bulk. Each has feats that could match each other in strength; maybe they've leveled a building or two with a single punch, and so on. You have perfect proof that The Flesh could obviously beat The Bulk in a fist fight.

However, the person you are debating with is known to the forum as IncomBulkFan87. Every time he posts, you find that he completely ignores your proof of the Flesh's victory and asserts that the Bulk is invincible or could easily beat anyone in a fist fight.

At this point, it may be very tempting to shout to him the following:

"You're a fanboy!"
"You're biased against The Flesh!"
"You're influenced by Miracle Comics against Lightpony Comics!"

You consider them to be completely pointless to debate with because of their obvious enjoyment of The Incomprehensible Bulk from Miracle Comics.

But don't do it! It will either automatically devolve into bashing or cause you to look the fool! Not to mention that calling someone a fanboy is also a means of discrediting someone so that your debate is more successful.

Instead, either agree to disagree with the person you're debating against, let someone else reason with the person, or put the 'fanboy' on Ignore.

Ad hominem is bad debating.

Originally posted by Creshosk
Ad hominem is bad debating.

It's funny, because that's the only style he knows.

Originally posted by batdude123
It's funny, because that's the only style he knows.
I guess you're referring to me? I find one thing very funny myself. Throughout this entire debate, you all love imagining that Superman wins this via some sort of FTL speedblitz. And such a FTL speedblitz would make it harder for Thor supporters to argue certainly... But you still haven't produced a single scan of a FTL speedblitz... not once. Not even one. Essentially, your argument is that Superman wins via a non-existent, non-supported capability against an opponent who has dealt with light speed attacks and opponents who have far outclassed him in speed with his magic, power and Mjolnir.

Not even one. Not once. Instead... it's a lot more like this:

"Superman uses a FTL speedblitz that instantly k.o.'s Thor. He has actually used a speedblitz to beat Mongul. I don't quite know how fast it is. But I'll just say that it is instant, FTL... I'll also assume that it's faster than Thor can react, despite Thor's on-panel FTL reflexes. Yup. Superman wins. Before Thor can do anything. Even though I've never proven that it could be instant. I just think that since he could... he will... and therefore he does."

I think I'll adopt your debating standards:

"Thor uses a spell that instantly traps Superman within a vortex of inescapable force. He has actually used a vortex of inescapable force to subdue classic Juggernaut and a bomb that would have destroyed a fifth of the universe. I don't quite know how fast it is. But I'll just say that it is instant. I'll also assume that it's faster than Superman can react, despite Superman's on-panel FTL reflexes. Yup. Thor wins. Before Superman can do anything. Even though I've never proven that it could be instant. I just think that since he could... he will... and therefore he does."

Instant vortex of inescapable force ftw. Classic Thor curbstomp 10/10. It's pretty fun arguing the way you do batdude123. I can dispense with proving a necessary premise to support my conclusion! Sweet...

💃

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
I guess you're referring to me? I find one thing very funny myself. Throughout this entire debate, you all love imagining that Superman wins this via some sort of FTL speedblitz.
One thing that I find funny. You use Ad Hominem to try and retort an accusation of using Ad Hominem.

Originally posted by Zeitgeist
One thing that I find funny. You use Ad Hominem to try and retort an accusation of using Ad Hominem.
he actually didn't use ad hominem in that quote, he was mocking the reasoning, not the posters themselves.

Originally posted by Zeitgeist
One thing that I find funny. You use Ad Hominem to try and retort an accusation of using Ad Hominem.
I don't interpret calling out a double standard as an ad hominem argument. If you're referring to my sarcastic overtones, I am certainly not above responding to sarcasm with sarcasm. Calling out a double standard loses no poignancy even when laced with sarcasm. If you don't appreciate the sarcasm, that's your cup of tea. Put me on ignore.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
I don't interpret calling out a double standard as an ad hominem argument. If you're referring to my sarcastic overtones, I am certainly not above responding to sarcasm with sarcasm. Calling out a double standard loses no poignancy even when laced with sarcasm. If you don't appreciate the sarcasm, that's your cup of tea. Put me on ignore.
I'm not quite sure why people are flaming you rather than debating you, I suggest you just ignore their flame bait....cuz you can't win in that game

Originally posted by Master-Borg
I'm not quite sure why people are flaming you rather than debating you, I suggest you just ignore their flame bait....cuz you can't win in that game
By calling the other side biased and fanboys as he's been doing he IS playing the flaming game...

Originally posted by Master-Borg
I'm not quite sure why people are flaming you rather than debating you, I suggest you just ignore their flame bait....cuz you can't win in that game
I don't have problems with flaming normally. If people think my arguments and/or criticisms are fundamentally flawed, they're free to point that out. Politely or rudely. Constructively or sarcastically. Just as long as there's some measure of debating involved also. Batdude123 and I have had some decent debates in the past. He's also been insultingly sarcastic with me at the same time. I fully expect him to continue both fronts. It's not like I don't give as good as I get.

🤣

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
I don't have problems with flaming normally. If people think my arguments and/or criticisms are fundamentally flawed, they're free to point that out.
Lies.


OneDumbG0 wrote on Apr 16th, 2008 09:28 PM:
Creshock, I have you on ignore. I was only able to see your post when batdude123 quoted it. Please don't reply to my posts anymore as I cannot and choose not to see your posts anymore directly. Thank you.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
Politely or rudely. Constructively or sarcastically. Just as long as there's some measure of debating involved also.
Which is why you put me on ignore right?

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
Batdude123 and I have had some decent debates in the past. He's also been insultingly sarcastic with me at the same time. I fully expect him to continue both fronts. It's not like I don't give as good as I get.
You mean like crying and putting the people you can't handle on ignore?

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
🤣
Yeah your post is hilarious... Almost completely devoid of truth...

Originally posted by Creshosk
Lies.

Which is why you put me on ignore right?

You mean like crying and putting the people you can't handle on ignore?

Yeah your post is hilarious... Almost completely devoid of truth...


Quoted for justice.

Guys, this stops now. If somebody has you on ignore that means they don't want to talk with you for whatever reason(s). It's not a licence to say what you want to about them thinking they won't see your posts. I'll be very clear. Bashing somebody who has you on ignore is not good. The fact that they have you on ignore means they're doing the right thing while you're still carrying on. It needs to stop.

if this was king thor id go with him but current thor gets his but whipped here

I'll have to go with Superman on this one 6/10. Thor's Hammer will be a little too much at times. But Superman is so well rounded to the point that, even if you're physically stronger than him, he's still faster. He can fly, heat vision, ice breath etc. Superman has so many powers, he could make up for a entire team. But I do feel that Thor is the better fighter.