Thor vs Superman

Started by shokosugi453 pages

So we all agree Superman > Thor? great.

Originally posted by shokosugi
So we all agree Superman > Thor? great.

I will only concede to Supes > Thor in the marital commitment category.

Originally posted by shokosugi
So we all agree Superman > Thor? great.

facepalm

Originally posted by Enyalus
I will only concede to Supes > Thor in the marital commitment category.

According to you that while Thor has the better damage soak, Superman feels a little bit stronger.

You're a liar.

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
According to you that while Thor has the better damage soak, Superman feels a little bit stronger.

You're a liar.


I most certainly am not a liar. I made an independent statement regarding Thor's durability and strength in an entirely separate thread. That's much different than agreeing with shokosugi when it comes to....anything, really.

😛

Originally posted by Enyalus
I most certainly am not a liar. I made an independent statement regarding Thor's durability and strength in an entirely separate thread. That's much different than agreeing with shokosugi when it comes to....anything, really.

😛

I was only joking, lol.

Seriously though, you feel Superman is a tad stronger?Well your wrong.

🤣

Originally posted by shokosugi
So we all agree Superman > Thor? great.
owned

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Seriously though, you feel Superman is a tad stronger?Well your wrong.

Well I'll be wrong then, seeing as how I didn't enjoy conceding that bit of ground to Supes, anyway.

Originally posted by Enyalus
Well I'll be wrong then, seeing as how I didn't enjoy conceding that bit of ground to Supes, anyway.

On a serious note though, what has Superman done, to prove to you, that he has superior strength, no matter how small the superiority is?

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
On a serious note though, what has Superman done, to prove to you, that he has superior strength, no matter how small the superiority is?

Right now (let me emphasize that), I can't think of single solo feat that puts it over the top clearly.

I think for me it was the consistency, strength-wise. Supes will go toe-to-toe and beat Doomsday, or Wonder Woman, or Darkseid, or Captain Marvel, or Konvikt (okay, he didn't beat him solo, but according to him he was hitting with enough force to shatter planetoids), etc, constantly. Sometimes Thor does well against Hulk physically, and sometimes not. And most times he gets his ass physically kicked by Kurse or Mangog or the Destroyer, etc.

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
On a serious note though, what has Superman done, to prove to you, that he has superior strength, no matter how small the superiority is?
Well looking at pretty much all his fight Superman has so far. It's pretty obvious Superman has better strength feats , striking feats and what every strength combat related feat than Thor. Thor will hit harder etc with his hammer though

A clear example is Hulk vs Thor.

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
On a serious note though, what has Superman done, to prove to you, that he has superior strength, no matter how small the superiority is?

Superman has defeated dozens of supervillains using his strength alone. Thor can't win a fight without his lame hammer.

And why the hell does it have to be a hammer?? why can't it be an AXE or a SWORD????!!!! why the hell does it have to be a hammer?!?!?! That's what i want to know! 😠

cause it's thor ignoramus.

and thor's strength has always been consistant, superman started out pretty weak by today's standards, and by an act not unlike inflation, he rivals thor.

hammers are lame

Originally posted by shokosugi
hammers are lame
so is having a bald human being that has no powers kick a kryptonians ass. you don't see any human without powers whipping Thor.

Originally posted by Enyalus
Right now (let me emphasize that), I can't think of single solo feat that puts it over the top clearly.

I think for me it was the consistency, strength-wise. Supes will go toe-to-toe and beat Doomsday, or Wonder Woman, or Darkseid, or Captain Marvel, or Konvikt (okay, he didn't beat him solo, but according to him he was hitting with enough force to shatter planetoids), etc, constantly. Sometimes Thor does well against Hulk physically, and sometimes not. And most times he gets his ass physically kicked by Kurse or Mangog or the Destroyer, etc.

That's because he has no feats that put him over Thor. The most anyone can say is that they are equals.

So Superman has more strength consistency? Thor constantly holds his own against the Hulk, Silver Surfer, Hercules and the likes. Thor has that too. His level of power has been portrayed as planet shattering on various occasions. Hell, even the Thor lite Beta Ray Bill has been shown to be on that level.

Show me one time Thor doesn't do well physically against Hulk. I have all the fights on hand if you want.

Getting you're ass kicked by Kurse, Mangog and the Destroyer is a bad thing? Kurse is built to be 4 times stronger than Thor. Of course Thor would physically be man handled. Mangog is Mangog. His a beast, and even the recent most version was only put down by Thor with an Anti-Force blast. His never been able to take on Mangog, and defeat him physically. The Destroyer? Are you serious? You're basing consistency on him being overpowered, and defeated by beings that are clearly portrayed as his superior?

No offense, but it feels as if you're stretching it a bit.

Originally posted by kgkg
Well looking at pretty much all his fight Superman has so far. It's pretty obvious Superman has better strength feats , striking feats and what every strength combat related feat than Thor. Thor will hit harder etc with his hammer though

A clear example is Hulk vs Thor.

It's pretty obvious Superman has better strength feats?

😆

Name a few, hell name one, that puts him clearly above Thor. For everyone of Superman's feats, Thor has his own to match. Baseless in my opinion. Lol. Show me Superman's so called better striking feats.

Whatever strength combat related feat? I've read plenty of Superman, and plenty of Thor, and I've yet to see these so called feats. Mjolnir only adds so much blunt force damage. Even without it, his shown planet rocking, and destroying strength.

What's you're point with the Hulk and Thor fight reference?

Don't forget that in his fights with Hulk, Thor holds back his strength and most of his power as he has stated. Him being mortal, and the entire rage thing.

Thor about power first and fighting second imo. But stupid writers have him brawl it out with bricks when he could so easily win the proper way.

Originally posted by chomperx9
so is having a bald human being that has no powers kick a kryptonians ass. you don't see any human without powers whipping Thor.

QFT.

Originally posted by The Nuul
QFT.
QFT ?