Fears about The Incredible Hulk

Started by CaptainStoic8 pages

Review: `Hulk' smashes a lot, but lacks heart
Wednesday June 11 3:15 PM ET

The fanboys will probably be happy with the latest incarnation of "The Incredible Hulk" At least we can say that much for it and that's something we most assuredly could not say about Ang Lee and James Schamus' somber, introspective and largely derided take in 2003 on the beloved Marvel Comics hero.

There's a lot more action this time around as you might expect from "Transporter" director Louis Leterrier a deafening, endless amount by the colossal conclusion as well as fond references both to the comic book series and to the television show it inspired starring Bill Bixby. (Leterrier even sneaks in some of Joseph Harnell's "Lonely Man" theme, or as Stewie on "Family Guy" refers to it, "That sad, walking-away song from `The Incredible Hulk.'"😉

This version is indeed bigger-stronger-faster, which seems appropriate in telling the story of a guy who's been juicing. The effects look way more ... is "realistic" the right word to describe a raging green giant, rampaging down 125th Street in Harlem, flipping cop cars into the air like toys? It's Showtime at the Apollo, all right unless it's your car.

But the inevitable comparisons to "Iron Man," Marvel Studios' first blockbuster this summer, serve as a glaring reminder of what this "Hulk" lacks: wit and heart. Despite the presence of Edward Norton, an actor capable of going just as deep as Robert Downey Jr., we don't feel a strong sense of Bruce Banner's inner conflict. And that's surprising, given that the famously detail-oriented Norton worked over Zak Penn's script. Instead, he's just a good guy trying to keep the wrong guys from getting their hands on some bad stuff an oversized cog in the midst of a spectacle.

A lightning-quick title sequence wisely zips through Bruce's back story: As we know by now, Doc Bruce Banner, belted by gamma rays, turns into The Hulk. We don't require further explanation. On the run but still seeking a cure to his radiation poisoning, Bruce lays low in a Brazilian favela, works at a bottling plant and tries to blend in by learning Portuguese from television. He's also taking martial arts classes in hopes of controlling his breathing and his anger. Clearly, they're not working.

One day, longtime enemy Gen. "Thunderbolt" Ross (William Hurt) tracks him down with a team of soldiers, including the hungry and slightly crazed Emil Blonsky (Tim Roth). The subsequent chase, in and out of cramped alleyways, across rooftops and through hanging laundry, is thrilling. Worthy of a "Bourne" movie, it's probably the film's most compelling sequence, and it didn't even require all that complicated computer-generated imagery. The irony is that the faster he runs, the higher his heart rate climbs and the more likely it becomes that he'll transform into The Hulk.

Ross wants what's inside Bruce's body to replicate it and create a team of super soldiers and Blonsky is all too happy to volunteer as Test Subject No. 1. Bruce must risk his safety and return to the lab where it all began to stop Ross and Blonsky. This means he also must run into his long-lost love, Dr. Betty Ross, played stiffly by Liv Tyler. Naturally, when they reunite in the pouring rain, she happens to be wearing a flimsy white blouse.

That's a rare delicate element of "The Incredible Hulk," though. From there, it's a series of increasingly bombastic showdowns and explosions leading up to the climactic battle between The Hulk and the 'roided-up beast Blonsky has become, known in the comic book series as The Abomination.

Tim Blake Nelson breaks up the third-act monotony with a hilariously weird performance as Samuel Sterns, the cellular biologist who tries to help Bruce rid his body of gamma rays. But it's the guy who walks through the door at the very end that'll really get the audience excited with the prospect of more superhero sound and fury to come.

"The Incredible Hulk," a Universal Pictures release, is rated PG-13 for sequences of intense action violence, some frightening sci-fi images and brief suggestive content. Running time: 114 minutes. Two and a half stars out of four.

How can you even rate, if you didn't see the film.

My opinion of the film. There is only so much trailers can show you

Originally posted by DigiMark007
If anyone saw the easter egg at the end of the IM credits, I think they might be starting to try and set that up.

I think that's EXACTLY what they're working on with the crossovers. I'm excited.

Yep, they're trying to set up the Avengers and that's gonna be awesome.

Originally posted by SpaceMonkey
I think that's EXACTLY what they're working on with the crossovers. I'm excited.
Originally posted by Stewie_Griffin
Yep, they're trying to set up the Avengers and that's gonna be awesome.

I went to see the movie today,

I absoulutely loved every moment of it,

9/10

Ed Norton, Will Hurt and Tim Roth were all amazing😄

It seems like the majority of people who've seen this movie have loved it.

for good reason🙂

So, if you could estimate, how much screentime does the Hulk get total?

I heard theres a captain america cameo in this film

Is that true or just a load of crap.

Originally posted by Kazenji
I heard theres a captain america cameo in this film

Is that true or just a load of crap.


Load of crap.

Originally posted by SpaceMonkey
I think that's EXACTLY what they're working on with the crossovers. I'm excited.

Avengers is slated for 2010, right after Iron Man 2 and Thor in 2009.

Sorry for the double post.

Originally posted by srankmissingnin
All the top film critics disagree with you...

Spider-man is a great superhero move that can be enjoyed by both the young and the old, it has action, humour, great character development and a huge amount of rewatchability (Batman Begin's biggest flaw). Both Spider-man and Spider-man 2 are better then Batman Begins.

X-2 is as well.


IA with Batman Begins as far as rewatchability and I am a batman fan. But of all the Batman films the only one I've watched fewer times than this one is Batman and Robin maybe? The movie is good but it has a tediousness about it too.

O and I saw Hulk today and I loved it. The only MAJOR downfall is Liv Tyler. Terrible.

Yeah Liv Tyler was crap IMO.

I would say The Hulk was around for around 3 quarters of the movie,

maybe a bit less.

I liked Liv Tyler, actually thought she should've had more lines. She did good enough for me.

I like that they introduced

Spoiler:
The Leader
for later movies.

Of course, and the dude playing him was so damn funny.

Originally posted by MightyEInherjar
Avengers is slated for 2010, right after Iron Man 2 and Thor in 2009.

Sorry for the double post.

Iron Man 2 & Thor are slated for 2010. Captain America & The Avengers are slated for 2011, just in time for Marvel's 50th Anniversary.

The Incredible Hulk was solid, but not as good as Iron Man. Less of the arty distractions that marred Ang Lee's film and more on the story & action. I think there will be an extended cut on DVD, to appease Edward Norton & Louis Leterrier.

I honestly liked this movie more than Iron Man but both movies were solid and are among the best movies of the year thus far.